Colonic stenting vs emergent surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

doi:10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5608

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 39

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (4399)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

447

HTML

3523

Figures (1-2)

234

Tables (1-2)

195

Sum=4399

Oct 21, 2012 (publication date) through Nov 27, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (39)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2012; 18(39): 5608-5615
Published online Oct 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5608

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Colonic stenting vs emergent surgery. A: One-stage stoma rates; B: Follow-up stoma rates; C: Anastomosis rates; D: Mortality; E: Morbidity; F: Anastomotic leak; G: Abscesses; H: Extra abdominal complication. M-H: Mantel Haenszel.

Citation: Ye GY, Cui Z, Chen L, Zhong M. Colonic stenting vs emergent surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(39): 5608-5615
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i39/5608.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5608