Topic Highlight Open Access
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2011; 17(20): 2558-2562
Published online May 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i20.2558
Proteasome inhibitor treatment in alcoholic liver disease
Fawzia Bardag-Gorce, Department of Pathology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, 1124 W. Carson St., Torrance, CA 90502, United States
Author contributions: Bardag-Gorce F wrote this review.
Supported by NIH/NIAAA 8116 and by a Pilot Project Funding from the Alcohol Center Grant on Liver and Pancreas P50-011999
Correspondence to: Fawzia Bardag-Gorce, PhD, Department of Pathology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor UCLA Medical Center, 1124 W. Carson St., Torrance, CA 90502, United States. fgorce@labiomed.org
Telephone: +1-310-2221846 Fax: +1-310-2223614
Received: January 6, 2011
Revised: February 2, 2011
Accepted: February 9, 2011
Published online: May 28, 2011

Abstract

Oxidative stress, generated by chronic ethanol consumption, is a major cause of hepatotoxicity and liver injury. Increased production of oxygen-derived free radicals due to ethanol metabolism by CYP2E1 is principally located in the cytoplasm and in the mitochondria, which does not only injure liver cells, but also other vital organs, such as the heart and the brain. Therefore, there is a need for better treatment to enhance the antioxidant response elements. To date, there is no established treatment to attenuate high levels of oxidative stress in the liver of alcoholic patients. To block this oxidative stress, proteasome inhibitor treatment has been found to significantly enhance the antioxidant response elements of hepatocytes exposed to ethanol. Recent studies have shown in an experimental model of alcoholic liver disease that proteasome inhibitor treatment at low dose has cytoprotective effects against ethanol-induced oxidative stress and liver steatosis. The beneficial effects of proteasome inhibitor treatment against oxidative stress occurred because antioxidant response elements (glutathione peroxidase 2, superoxide dismutase 2, glutathione synthetase, glutathione reductase, and GCLC) were up-regulated when rats fed alcohol were treated with a low dose of PS-341 (Bortezomib, Velcade®). This is an important finding because proteasome inhibitor treatment up-regulated reactive oxygen species removal and glutathione recycling enzymes, while ethanol feeding alone down-regulated these antioxidant elements. For the first time, it was shown that proteasome inhibition by a highly specific and reversible inhibitor is different from the chronic ethanol feeding-induced proteasome inhibition. As previously shown by our group, chronic ethanol feeding causes a complex dysfunction in the ubiquitin proteasome pathway, which affects the proteasome system, as well as the ubiquitination system. The beneficial effects of proteasome inhibitor treatment in alcoholic liver disease are related to proteasome inhibitor reversibility and the rebound of proteasome activity 72 h post PS-341 administration.

Key Words: Alcoholic liver disease, Glutathione, Oxidative stress, Proteasome inhibitor treatment, Steatosis



INTRODUCTION

Excessive alcohol consumption is recognized worldwide as a leading cause of disease, disability, and death[1]. Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a collective term for the pathophysiological changes caused by chronic alcohol consumption. These changes include oxidative stress generation, liver steatosis and inflammatory response fibrosis, and cirrhosis.

The marked generation of oxidative stress associated with ethanol metabolism is one of the main liver injuries caused by chronic alcohol consumption. Oxidative stress causes dysfunctions in several cellular mechanisms, such as DNA repair and antioxidant systems. CYP2E1, which is up-regulated to metabolize ethanol[2], in mitochondria[3], and activated Kupffer cells[4], generates free radicals through the oxidation of NADPH to NADP+, which induces hepatocyte necrosis and apoptosis[5]. In addition, high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) promote lipid peroxidation and end-products formation, such as malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal. These aldehydes are highly interactive and form adducts by binding covalently to cellular proteins, thus forming antigenic adducts, which cause inflammation[6,7].

Oxidant stress can be counterbalanced by the hepatocyte antioxidant defense, which induces both enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms. One of the major mechanisms by which cells protect themselves against oxidative stress is the up-regulation of a wide range of antioxidant genes. Among the intracellular antioxidant molecules, reduced glutathione (GSH) is the most abundant intracellular non-protein thiol in cells. Glutathione is the first level of cellular antioxidative response, and is important for a variety of biological functions, including protection of cells from oxidative damage by free radicals, detoxification of xenobiotics, and membrane transport. By keeping the cellular environment in a reduced state, GSH is responsible for the removal of potentially toxic electrophiles and metals, thereby protecting cells from toxic oxygen products[8]. Furthermore, GSH exhibits a large panel of actions in controlling gene expression, apoptosis mechanisms, and membrane transport[9]. Therefore, cells tightly regulate the synthesis, utilization, and export of GSH. L-S,R-buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), a potent specific inhibitor of γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase, the rate-limiting enzyme in GSH biosynthesis, has been used to deplete intracellular GSH and reverse drug resistance in tumor cells[10], showing that GSH is a chemoresistance factor in cancer cells. The second level of cellular antioxidative response is the gene expression up-regulation of antioxidative enzymes. Among the enzymatic antioxidant defenses are: (1) glutathione synthetase (GSS) and superoxide dismutases (SOD), which dismutates O2 into H2O2 and O2; (2) catalase, which removes H2O2, generating H2O and O2; and (3) glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and glutathione reductase (GSR), which, using the cofactor NADPH, decompose H2O2, while reducing glutathione[11]. Alcohol has been shown to deplete GSH levels, particularly in the mitochondria. Mitochondria are usually characterized by high levels of GSH needed to eliminate the ROS generated during respiratory chain activity[12], and can not synthesize GSH, but import it from the cytosol using a carrier protein embedded in the membrane surrounding the mitochondria. Alcohol has been reported to interfere with the function of this carrier protein, thereby leading to the depletion of mitochondrial GSH[13].

CURRENT TREATMENT FOR ALD

Several pharmaco-therapeutic studies have been undertaken to cure alcoholic hepatitis. The best known are the treatments that block tumor necrosis factor α and reduce inflammation (pentoxifylline, infliximab, etanercept)[14-16]. However, these treatments are associated with an increase of infections and death.

The antioxidant therapy included Vitamin E supplementation. However, the outcome of clinical trials did not show any improvement in patients with alcoholic hepatitis[17]. In addition, it has been shown that alcohol not only increases the production of ROS, but it also inhibits the antioxidants defense. It has also been shown that antioxidant therapy alone, or in combination with corticosteroids, did not improve 6-mo survival in severe alcoholic hepatitis[18]. The drug most widely used for alcoholism today is Disulfiram. Disulfiram, an inhibitor of aldehyde dehydrogenase, prevents acetaldehyde metabolism, and causes immediate and severe negative reactions to alcohol intake[19]. Recently, it has been used as an anti-tumor drug because it has the characteristic of a proteasome inhibitor[20,21]. New drugs and new treatments are thus needed since currently available treatments are not adequate. The latest studies using Disulfiram point to the potential of proteasome inhibitor treatment for ALD.

PROTEASOME INHIBITOR TREATMENT FOR ALD

Proteasome controls the degradation of cellular proteins and is closely implicated in signal transduction, development and cell cycle progression[22], antigen processing and immune response[23], and inflammation[24]. Proteasome inhibition has already proved to be a novel and promising strategy for the treatment of cancer[25-27]. Specifically, PS-341 (Bortezomib, Velcade®), a boronic acid dipeptide with selective activity as a proteasome inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma[28], and has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration[29]. It is now under evaluation for its activity in a variety of other hematologic and solid malignancies[30-33]. Proteasome is considered an antioxidant defense in the cell due to its activity of removing damaged and oxidized proteins. Numerous reports have demonstrated that proteasome inhibitors cause an accumulation of oxidatively damaged proteins, indicating that a large majority of oxidatively damaged proteins, both in the cytosol and the nucleus of mammalian cells, are removed by the 20S proteasome[34,35]. However, it is also important to mention that proteasome inhibition is also an antioxidative defense, as it leads to an up-regulation in the gene expression of antioxidative enzymes. Although it is now well established that impairment of the ubiquitin proteasome pathway is implicated in the pathogenesis of ALD, a growing body of evidence shows that proteasome inhibitors provide protection against oxidative stress in the brain and in the heart[36-39].

Ethanol ingestion appears to have diverse effects on 26S proteasome activity, and no significant effects on the 20S proteasome[2]. The 26S proteasome activities are significantly decreased in the liver of rats fed ethanol[2,40-43]. This ethanol-induced proteasome pathway dysfunction is different from the proteasome inhibition obtained by using the proteasome inhibitor PS-341[44]. Microarray analysis studies have shown that the gene expression of antioxidative enzymes was not increased in the liver of rats fed ethanol chronically, when compared to that of rats given proteasome inhibitor PS-341[45].

Moreover, chronic ethanol exposure has been shown to deplete GSH levels, particularly in the mitochondria, which are usually characterized by high levels of GSH needed to eliminate the ROS generated during respiratory chain activity[13,46,47], while proteasome inhibition by PS-341 activates the gene expression of GSH recycling enzymes[48]. These authors showed a significant increase in the gene expression of antioxidative enzymes, such as glutathione reductase (GSR), glutathione synthetase (GSS), glutathione peroxidase 2 (GPX2), and superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2), when rats were treated with the proteasome inhibitor PS-341. Exposure to a non-toxic low dose of proteasome inhibitor induced an increase in the antioxidative defense, thus suppressing ROS production, and therefore protecting against oxidative stress-induced hepatotoxicity due to chronic ethanol feeding. The beneficial effects of proteasome inhibition are not only related to the up-regulation of antioxidative enzyme gene expression[49], but also to the up-regulation of heat shock proteins[50], which is believed to prevent protein misfolding and the formation of protein aggregates. Thus, it is now postulated that these cytoprotective qualities obtained by the inhibition of proteasome at non-toxic doses might be beneficial in the treatment of hepatocyte injury associated with ALD. In addition, PS-341 is a highly specific and reversible proteasome inhibitor that produces a recovery and even a rebound of proteasome activity to higher levels 48 to 72 h post-treatment[48]. At the same time that proteasome inhibitor treatment up-regulated the antioxidant response elements, it down-regulated SREBP1-c[51] and the lipogenic enzymes gene expression, thus significantly decreasing steatosis in the liver of rats fed ethanol chronically[51]. It has also been found that IκB was significantly stabilized by proteasome inhibitor treatment in the liver of rats fed ethanol for 1 mo, which reflected a significant decrease in nNuclear factor (NF)-κB activation and a decrease in the expression of inflammatory genes regulated by NF-κB[52].

Chronic ethanol exposure increases the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and disrupts immune defenses, increasing susceptibility to and the severity of infections. Proteasome inhibitor treatment can modulate the chronic ethanol-induced impairment of immune response and its consequences on host defense against microbial pathogens and tissue injury. These discoveries strongly indicate that proteasome inhibitor treatment has great potential in alcoholic liver disease therapy.

CONCLUSION

PS-341 is currently used in humans as an antitumor drug[26], and numerous studies have shown that it also represents a potential drug treatment for alcoholic liver disease. Proteasome inhibitors are a promising treatment to reduce ROS production, to reduce liver steatosis, and to reduce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines caused by chronic ethanol feeding.

Footnotes

Peer reviewer: Saúl Villa-Trevio, MD, PhD, Departamento de Biología Celular, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN (Cinvestav), Ave. IPN No. 2508. Col. San Pedro, Zacatenco, CP 07360, México, DF, Mexico

S- Editor Tian L L- Editor Webster JR E- Editor Zheng XM

References
1.  Li TK. Quantifying the risk for alcohol-use and alcohol-attributable health disorders: present findings and future research needs. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23 Suppl 1:S2-S8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Bardag-Gorce F, Yuan QX, Li J, French BA, Fang C, Ingelman-Sundberg M, French SW. The effect of ethanol-induced cytochrome p4502E1 on the inhibition of proteasome activity by alcohol. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;279:23-29.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Cahill A, Cunningham CC, Adachi M, Ishii H, Bailey SM, Fromenty B, Davies A. Effects of alcohol and oxidative stress on liver pathology: the role of the mitochondrion. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002;26:907-915.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Thakur V, Pritchard MT, McMullen MR, Wang Q, Nagy LE. Chronic ethanol feeding increases activation of NADPH oxidase by lipopolysaccharide in rat Kupffer cells: role of increased reactive oxygen in LPS-stimulated ERK1/2 activation and TNF-alpha production. J Leukoc Biol. 2006;79:1348-1356.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Conde de la Rosa L, Schoemaker MH, Vrenken TE, Buist-Homan M, Havinga R, Jansen PL, Moshage H. Superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide induce hepatocyte death by different mechanisms: involvement of JNK and ERK MAP kinases. J Hepatol. 2006;44:918-929.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Nieto N, Friedman SL, Cederbaum AI. Stimulation and proliferation of primary rat hepatic stellate cells by cytochrome P450 2E1-derived reactive oxygen species. Hepatology. 2002;35:62-73.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Heller JI, Crowley JR, Hazen SL, Salvay DM, Wagner P, Pennathur S, Heinecke JW. p-hydroxyphenylacetaldehyde, an aldehyde generated by myeloperoxidase, modifies phospholipid amino groups of low density lipoprotein in human atherosclerotic intima. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:9957-9962.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Anderson ME. Glutathione: an overview of biosynthesis and modulation. Chem Biol Interact. 1998;111-112:1-14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Hammond CL, Lee TK, Ballatori N. Novel roles for glutathione in gene expression, cell death, and membrane transport of organic solutes. J Hepatol. 2001;34:946-954.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Fojo T, Bates S. Strategies for reversing drug resistance. Oncogene. 2003;22:7512-7523.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Chang P, Cheng E, Brooke S, Sapolsky R. Marked differences in the efficacy of post-insult gene therapy with catalase versus glutathione peroxidase. Brain Res. 2005;1063:27-31.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Goy A, Younes A, McLaughlin P, Pro B, Romaguera JE, Hagemeister F, Fayad L, Dang NH, Samaniego F, Wang M. Phase II study of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:667-675.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Fernández-Checa JC, Kaplowitz N, García-Ruiz C, Colell A, Miranda M, Marí M, Ardite E, Morales A. GSH transport in mitochondria: defense against TNF-induced oxidative stress and alcohol-induced defect. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:G7-G17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Akriviadis E, Botla R, Briggs W, Han S, Reynolds T, Shakil O. Pentoxifylline improves short-term survival in severe acute alcoholic hepatitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1637-1648.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Naveau S, Chollet-Martin S, Dharancy S, Mathurin P, Jouet P, Piquet MA, Davion T, Oberti F, Broët P, Emilie D. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of infliximab associated with prednisolone in acute alcoholic hepatitis. Hepatology. 2004;39:1390-1397.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Boetticher NC, Peine CJ, Kwo P, Abrams GA, Patel T, Aqel B, Boardman L, Gores GJ, Harmsen WS, McClain CJ. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of etanercept in the treatment of alcoholic hepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:1953-1960.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Mezey E, Potter JJ, Rennie-Tankersley L, Caballeria J, Pares A. A randomized placebo controlled trial of vitamin E for alcoholic hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2004;40:40-46.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Stewart S, Prince M, Bassendine M, Hudson M, James O, Jones D, Record C, Day CP. A randomized trial of antioxidant therapy alone or with corticosteroids in acute alcoholic hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2007;47:277-283.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Wright C, Moore RD. Disulfiram treatment of alcoholism. Am J Med. 1990;88:647-655.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Cvek B, Dvorak Z. The value of proteasome inhibition in cancer. Can the old drug, disulfiram, have a bright new future as a novel proteasome inhibitor? Drug Discov Today. 2008;13:716-722.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Wickström M, Danielsson K, Rickardson L, Gullbo J, Nygren P, Isaksson A, Larsson R, Lövborg H. Pharmacological profiling of disulfiram using human tumor cell lines and human tumor cells from patients. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;73:25-33.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Naujokat C, Berges C, Höh A, Wieczorek H, Fuchs D, Ovens J, Miltz M, Sadeghi M, Opelz G, Daniel V. Proteasomal chymotrypsin-like peptidase activity is required for essential functions of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Immunology. 2007;120:120-132.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Kloetzel PM. The proteasome and MHC class I antigen processing. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1695:225-233.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Visekruna A, Joeris T, Seidel D, Kroesen A, Loddenkemper C, Zeitz M, Kaufmann SH, Schmidt-Ullrich R, Steinhoff U. Proteasome-mediated degradation of IkappaBalpha and processing of p105 in Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:3195-3203.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Groll M, Huber R, Moroder L. The persisting challenge of selective and specific proteasome inhibition. J Pept Sci. 2009;15:58-66.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Gilardini A, Marmiroli P, Cavaletti G. Proteasome inhibition: a promising strategy for treating cancer, but what about neurotoxicity? Curr Med Chem. 2008;15:3025-3035.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Chauhan D, Bianchi G, Anderson KC. Targeting the UPS as therapy in multiple myeloma. BMC Biochem. 2008;9 Suppl 1:S1.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Berenson J, Singhal S, Jagannath S, Irwin D, Rajkumar SV, Srkalovic G, Alsina M, Alexanian R. A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2609-2617.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Dou QP, Goldfarb RH. Bortezomib (millennium pharmaceuticals). IDrugs. 2002;5:828-834.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Davis NB, Taber DA, Ansari RH, Ryan CW, George C, Vokes EE, Vogelzang NJ, Stadler WM. Phase II trial of PS-341 in patients with renal cell cancer: a University of Chicago phase II consortium study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:115-119.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Kondagunta GV, Drucker B, Schwartz L, Bacik J, Marion S, Russo P, Mazumdar M, Motzer RJ. Phase II trial of bortezomib for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3720-3725.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  Shah MH, Young D, Kindler HL, Webb I, Kleiber B, Wright J, Grever M. Phase II study of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (PS-341) in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:6111-6118.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Papandreou CN, Daliani DD, Nix D, Yang H, Madden T, Wang X, Pien CS, Millikan RE, Tu SM, Pagliaro L. Phase I trial of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors with observations in androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2108-2121.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Jung T, Engels M, Kaiser B, Poppek D, Grune T. Intracellular distribution of oxidized proteins and proteasome in HT22 cells during oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;40:1303-1312.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Kelly SM, Vanslyke JK, Musil LS. Regulation of ubiquitin-proteasome system mediated degradation by cytosolic stress. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:4279-4291.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Yamamoto N, Sawada H, Izumi Y, Kume T, Katsuki H, Shimohama S, Akaike A. Proteasome inhibition induces glutathione synthesis and protects cells from oxidative stress: relevance to Parkinson disease. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:4364-4372.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Williams AJ, Dave JR, Tortella FC. Neuroprotection with the proteasome inhibitor MLN519 in focal ischemic brain injury: relation to nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB), inflammatory gene expression, and leukocyte infiltration. Neurochem Int. 2006;49:106-112.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Nencioni A, Grünebach F, Patrone F, Ballestrero A, Brossart P. Proteasome inhibitors: antitumor effects and beyond. Leukemia. 2007;21:30-36.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Lorenz M, Wilck N, Meiners S, Ludwig A, Baumann G, Stangl K, Stangl V. Proteasome inhibition prevents experimentally-induced endothelial dysfunction. Life Sci. 2009;84:929-934.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Donohue TM, Cederbaum AI, French SW, Barve S, Gao B, Osna NA. Role of the proteasome in ethanol-induced liver pathology. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31:1446-1459.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  French SW. Intragastric ethanol infusion model for cellular and molecular studies of alcoholic liver disease. J Biomed Sci. 2001;8:20-27.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Preedy VR, Adachi J, Asano M, Koll M, Mantle D, Niemela O, Parkkila S, Paice AG, Peters T, Rajendram R. Free radicals in alcoholic myopathy: indices of damage and preventive studies. Free Radic Biol Med. 2002;32:683-687.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
43.  Gouillon Z, Lucas D, Li J, Hagbjork AL, French BA, Fu P, Fang C, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Donohue TM, French SW. Inhibition of ethanol-induced liver disease in the intragastric feeding rat model by chlormethiazole. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 2000;224:302-308.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
44.  Bousquet-Dubouch MP, Nguen S, Bouyssié D, Burlet-Schiltz O, French SW, Monsarrat B, Bardag-Gorce F. Chronic ethanol feeding affects proteasome-interacting proteins. Proteomics. 2009;9:3609-3622.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
45.  Oliva J, Dedes J, Li J, French SW, Bardag-Gorce F. Epigenetics of proteasome inhibition in the liver of rats fed ethanol chronically. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:705-712.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  Zeng T, Zhang CL, Zhu ZP, Yu LH, Zhao XL, Xie KQ. Diallyl trisulfide (DATS) effectively attenuated oxidative stress-mediated liver injury and hepatic mitochondrial dysfunction in acute ethanol-exposed mice. Toxicology. 2008;252:86-91.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Das SK, Vasudevan DM. Alcohol-induced oxidative stress. Life Sci. 2007;81:177-187.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  Bardag-Gorce F, Oliva J, Lin A, Li J, French BA, French SW. Proteasome inhibitor up regulates liver antioxidative enzymes in rat model of alcoholic liver disease. Exp Mol Pathol. 2011;90:123-130.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
49.  Meiners S, Ludwig A, Lorenz M, Dreger H, Baumann G, Stangl V, Stangl K. Nontoxic proteasome inhibition activates a protective antioxidant defense response in endothelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;40:2232-2241.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
50.  Bardag-Gorce F, Vu J, Nan L, Riley N, Li J, French SW. Proteasome inhibition induces cytokeratin accumulation in vivo. Exp Mol Pathol. 2004;76:83-89.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
51.  Oliva J, Lin A, Li J, French BA, French SW, Bardag-Gorce F. Proteasome inhibitor treatment reduces hepatic steatosis by decreasing lipogenic enzymes gene expression. The 33rd Annual RSA Scientific Meeting; 2010 Jun 26-30; San Antonio, Texas, USA. Alcoholism: Clinical Experimental Research, 2010: 87A, Abstract #308. .  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
52.  Bardag-Gorce F, Oliva J, Li A, Li J, French SW. The beneficial effects of proteasome inhibitor treatment in alcoholic liver disease. FASEB J. 2011;25:366.9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]