Topic Highlight Open Access
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2008; 14(6): 864-875
Published online Feb 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.864
Stem cells for liver tissue repair: Current knowledge and perspectives
Philippe A Lysy, David Campard, Françoise Smets, Mustapha Najimi, Etienne M Sokal, Université Catholique de Louvain & Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, HPED Department, Unit PEDI, Laboratory of Pediatric Hepatology and Cell Therapy, Brussels 1200, Belgium
Correspondence to: Etienne M Sokal, Pediatric Hepatology and Cell Therapy, Université Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Saint Luc,10 av. Hippocrate, Brussels 1200, Belgium. sokal@pedi.ucl.ac.be
Telephone: +32-2-7641387
Fax: +32-2-7648909
Received: June 27, 2007
Revised: August 17, 2007
Published online: February 14, 2008

Abstract

Stem cells from extra- or intrahepatic sources have been recently characterized and their usefulness for the generation of hepatocyte-like lineages has been demonstrated. Therefore, they are being increasingly considered for future applications in liver cell therapy. In that field, liver cell transplantation is currently regarded as a possible alternative to whole organ transplantation, while stem cells possess theoretical advantages on hepatocytes as they display higher in vitro culture performances and could be used in autologous transplant procedures. However, the current research on the hepatic fate of stem cells is still facing difficulties to demonstrate the acquisition of a full mature hepatocyte phenotype, both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, the lack of obvious demonstration of in vivo hepatocyte-like cell functionality remains associated to low repopulation rates obtained after current transplantation procedures. The present review focuses on the current knowledge of the stem cell potential for liver therapy. We discuss the characteristics of the principal cell candidates and the methods to demonstrate their hepatic potential in vitro and in vivo. We finally address the question of the future clinical applications of stem cells for liver tissue repair and the technical aspects that remain to be investigated.

Key Words: Stem cells, Hepatocyte differentiation, Liver regeneration, Cell therapy



INTRODUCTION

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the gold standard treatment for end-stage liver failure and for numerous liver based inborn errors of metabolism. However, organ shortage remains a major limiting factor and alternative solutions are being examined in the liver therapy field. Liver cell transplantation (LCT) is emerging with heartening success[12], but is still limited by cell viability, modest engraftment and limited tissue availability. Increasing interest is carried to stem cells regarding the recent demonstration of their plasticity[3]. Theoretical advantages of stem cells for tissue regenerative medicine are multiple: ease of harvest, proliferation capacity, efficiency of in vitro transfection and potential use of autologous cells. Different types of stem cells are eligible for liver cell therapy according to their hepatic potential, for instance mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and adult liver stem/progenitor cells. Despite encouraging results, key pitfalls remain while using stem cells-derived hepatocyte-like cells: lack of tissue-specific functionality and, up to now, no evidence of strong liver repopulation level in animal models. Moreover, the demonstration of the acquired hepatocyte-like phenotype is impaired by technical restraints. To reach clinical application, stem cell therapy requires further development to become competitive regarding LCT. Here, we present the current knowledge on the use of stem cells for hepatic tissue engineering and describe the future orientations in the field.

IDENTIFICATION OF THE STEM CELL CANDIDATES
Mesenchymal stem cells

Firstly described in 1970 from bone marrow (BM) isolates[4], these cells can currently be obtained from various tissue sources as BM, cord blood (CB), adipose tissue, umbilical cord blood (UCB). Their in vivo function and behavior remain largely unknown[5]. MSCs have the characteristics to be highly proliferative in vitro, easily transfectable, resistant to cryopreservation[6] and to display a large in vitro and in vivo differentiation potential[7]. The first description of their hepatic potential was provided by Lee et al[8] and confirmed by other studies[926] (Table 1). While some studies evidenced the in vivo potential of MSCs[1021], this was recently questioned by other authors who did not detect engrafting cells after syngeneic transplantation[20]. However, experimental protocols were quite different rendering comparison hazardous. A key advantage of MSCs is their immunological properties making them lesser immunogenic and possibly able to induce tolerance as highlighted by promising in vitro studies and clinical trials[2732].

Table 1 Representative studies investigating in vitro and/or in vivo hepatocyte differentiation of MSCs.
Cell sourceIn vitrodifferentiationIn vivodifferentiationReferences
Human BM&UCB immunoselectionCocktail: EGF-bFGF (2 d), HGF-bFGF-nicot (7 d), OSM-dexa-ITS Characterization: RT-PCR (8), ICC (2), urea production, LDL uptake, PRODNDLee et al[8]
Human UCBNDHost: preimmune fetal sheep Injury: - Cell characterization: Alb+, HepPar1+ Fusion: microdissection + PCR: - Repopulation rate: > 20%Kögler et al[16]
Human adipose tissueCocktail: DMSO-HGF-OSM Characterization: RT-PCR (4), ICC (1), urea production, LDL uptakeHost: NOD/SCID mice Injury: CCl4 TRP: 1.106 cells, tail vein Cell characterization: Alb+/CM-Dil+ Repopulation rate: up to 0.13% Alb+ at 10 dSeo et al[22]
Human BM MSCs, CD34+ cells, non MSCs/CD34- cellsNDHost: WT rats (+CsA) Injury: AA TRP: 1.106 cells, liver Cell characterization: Alb+, CK18+, CK19+, αFP+, AGPR+, serum Alb+ Fusion: FISH hum Y/rat chr 12: -Sato et al[21]
Human BMCocktail: 5'aza (1 d) - EGF-EGF (14 d) Characterization: RT-PCR (11), ICC (4), WB (4), urea production, PAS, reporter gene construct for PEPCK activityHost: Pfp/Rag2-/- mice Injury: propanolol, partial hepatect TRP: 1.106 cells, liver Cell characterization: Alb+, HepPar-1+, PEPCK+, CX32+, PAS+ Fusion: FISH hum alu/mouse satellite: -Aurich et al[10]
Human BMCocktail: HGF-FGF4-ITS-nicot (7 d), OSM-dexa-ITS (15 d) Characterization: RT-PCR (17), ICC (8), flow cytometry, urea&Alb production, PAS, G6Pase activity, neoglucogenesisHost: SCID mice Injury: partial hepatect or retrorsine/AA TRP: 1.106 cells, spleen or liver Cell characterization: Alb+, αFP+, CK18+, fibronectin+, vimentin+, hum alu+Lysy et al[106]
Hematopoietic stem cells

These cells constitute the paradigm of stem cells: cells capable of self-renewing, proliferation and production of a progeny of committed cell lineages, permitting the regeneration of the tissue, even after transplantation. These can be isolated from BM, UCB and peripheral blood[33] making them highly available while they are still difficult to expand in vitro[3435]. In this cell population, cell identity and phenotype are mainly determined by a selection procedure whose criteria remain debated[36]. HSCs have recently aroused much enthusiasm in the hepatology field after the demonstration of their hepatic differentiation potential as described in Table 2. A majority of studies used mononuclear cell preparations[3763], which hamper the identification of the cells involved in the differentiation process. For that reason, we included in Table 2 only studies using defined subpopulations[6480]. However, HSCs’ liver potential is increasingly debated[40658184] and the possibility of cell fusion as an explanation of ‘plasticity’ make these cells less considerable for a clinical use[85].

Table 2 Representative studies investigating in vitro and/or in vivo hepatocyte differentiation of HSCs.
Cell sourceIn vitrodifferentiationIn vivodifferentiationReferences
Mouse BMNDHost: irradiated FAH-/- mice Injury: NTBC withdrawal TRP: 10 to 1000 cells; retroorbital plexus Cell characterization: β-gal+, Alb+, DPPIV+, e-cadherin+, FISH Y+, liver function, FAH activity Repopulation rate: 30%-50% βgal+ cellsLagasse et al[73]
Mouse BMNDHost: irradiated CD45.1+ mice Injury: hepatect or anti-Fas Ab treatment TRP: 106 cells; vein Cell characterization: CK8+, CK18+, CK19+, CD45.2+, FISH Y+, PCR Bcl-2+ Repopulation rate: up to 0.05%-0.8% with anti-Fas Ab treatmentMallet et al[74]
Human UCB&BMNDHost: irradiated NOD/SCID mice ± HGF Injury: CCl4 TRP: 2000 to 105 cells; vein Cell characterization: Alb+, CD45-, human alu+, CK19+, Alb mRNA+, serum Alb+ Repopulation rate: < 1%Wang et al[77]
Human UCB&PBNDHost: irradiated NOD/SCID mice Injury: CCl4 TRP: 2 to 6 × 105 CD34+ cells; tail vein Cell characterization: CD45+, Alb+, α1-AT+, hum DNA+, hum Alb mRNA+&prot+ Repopulation rate: ≤ 0.01% hum Alb mRNA in mice vs human liverKollet et al[70]
Mouse BMCocktail: co-culture with damaged liver tissue Characterization: RT-PCR (8), ICC (10), FISH Alb mRNAHost: mice ± irradiation Injury: CCl4 TRP: 105 cells; tail vein Cell characterization: Alb+, FISH Y+, E-cadh+, PKH26+, serum liver function Repopulation rate: up to 7.6% at 2 d Fusion: FISH X-Y: -Jang et al[69]
Mouse BMNDHost: mice ± irradiation ± rhG-CSF Injury: partial hepatect or CCl4 TRP: 5 × 103 selected cells or 5 × 105 MNCs; spleen Cell characterization: no co-eGFP/DPPIV staining, PCR eGFP- Repopulation rate: 0/6.9 × 107 host hepatocytesCantz et al[65]
Adult liver stem cells

As organ shortage is limiting the availability of this cell population, the conditions for their use in cell therapy are governed by two main characteristics, a high proliferation rate and/or a robust cell banking capacity. Regarding their promising hepatocyte-like functionality, some cell compartments could be promptly considered for toxicological assays. Even if identity and in vivo function of this cell population are currently under controversy, four main types of hepatic progenitors are described: oval cells, small hepatocytes, liver epithelial cells and mesenchymal-like cells. Oval cells are generated from the biliary tree in response to hepatic injury. They display a bipotent differentiation potential (hepatic and biliary cells) and can be expanded in vitro. There is no consensus on whether these cells are originating in BM or not[4886]. However, similar cell types were recently isolated from healthy liver[87]. The first description of small hepatocytes isolation was made by Mitaka et al[88] from a non-parenchymal fraction after centrifugation of isolated liver cells. These cells are smaller than hepatocytes, possess an in vitro proliferation capacity[89] and can differentiate into mature hepatocytes in vitro[90]. Liver epithelial cells is a population firstly described by Tsao et al[91] and more recently in healthy adult human liver[92]. Although different from oval cells, these cells are bipotential and able to differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells in vivo[92]. A mesenchymal-like cell population has also been isolated from adult human liver[9394]. This population depicts high level of proliferation and, as MSCs, possesses a broad differentiation potential. How these cells share MSCs’ immunological properties has to be determined. Other cell types were also isolated from manipulated livers[95], but the possibility of culture artefacts[9697] should always be considered before describing new ‘liver progenitor cells’.

Other cell types

Embryonic stem cells constitute, at present, the best in vitro model for hepatocyte differentiation. However, ethical restrictions[98] and the possibility of malignancies development[99] mainly limit their use in the clinical setting[100101]. Other more committed cell lineages as monocytes[102103] or fibroblasts[104] were evaluated for hepatic differentiation. In this context, recent data about nuclear reprogramming[105] provided possible explanation of the differentiation potential of cells thought to be restricted to a cell lineage.

IN VITRO STUDY AS ARGUMENT FOR HEPATOCYTE COMMITMENT

Up to now, studies illustrating in vitro hepatic features of stem cells-derived hepatocyte-like cells were essentially confined at the phenotypic rather than the functional level. Acquisition of specific markers is a tool for evidencing a cell commitment while hepatocyte-like functionality is required to consider a cell for therapy.

Hepatocyte-like phenotype

While a morphological change is common after in vitro cell conditioning, the morphology is rarely similar to mature hepatocytes and authors should rather talk about a ‘hepatocyte-like morphology’ in differentiating cells, more especially as ultrastructural data are mostly not provided. How the morphological changes are evocative of the acquisition of an epithelial phenotype is questionable as similar morphological changes can be obtained when incubating hBM-MSCs with a classical differentiation medium or with a control medium[106]. Using specific protein and mRNA marker expression for the description of a hepatocyte-like phenotype could also be questioned as many studies were based on restricted panel of markers and as some authors described the presence of hepatocyte-specific markers in undifferentiated cells[814162282107108]. The broadest amount of markers for phenotypic characterization should be used. In this manner, we observed an incomplete and erratic acquisition of hepatocyte-specific features in hBM-MSCs[106], cf Table 1. Moreover, these cells partially maintained the expression of native mesenchymal markers, suggesting a chimerical phenotype. This phenotype could be the result of the artificial in vitro differentiation process.

Hepatocyte-like functionality

The functional characterization of stem cells-derived hepatocyte-like cells is, up to now, principally achieved by commercially available assays (ELISA, colorimetric tests, PROD or EROD assays) whose handling are often poorly reproducible and quite difficult to interpret, or by other tests (as lipoprotein uptake) with low specificity. As clearly stated by Hengstler et al[109] in a recent report, there is a crucial need for standardized and normalized techniques for characterizing hepatocyte-like functionality in differentiating cells. Regarding clinical application, one should provide the evidence of a specific functional activity after differentiation before considering stem cells for cell therapy.

IN VIVO STUDY AS PROOF OF HEPATOCYTE DIFFERENTIATION POTENTIAL
Direct detection of differentiated donor cells in situ

Most studies about stem cells in vivo hepatic repopulation and differentiation are performed in a xenogeneic setting (e.g. human cells transplanted into immunocompromised rodents). The impact of cell-to-cell interactions in an interspecies microenvironment on cell adhesion and differentiation[110] is poorly documented. Moreover, this model does not reflect clearly the clinical reality and data must be carefully interpreted. In the same way, a drawback of allogeneic cell transplantation in rodents is that stem cell behavior was described to be quite different between species making extrapolation to human perilous[111]. Besides a huge diversity in the studies design, almost all in vivo models are based on the analysis of a repopulation potential after cell infusion in a diseased liver. Putative mechanisms of hepatic repopulation and tools designed to enhance it are described in Figure 1. It arises from the literature that hepatocyte differentiation from extrahepatic stem cells does not occur (or at very low level) in a non-injury model, and that the injury has to be strong enough and give advantage to the donor cells to seed and proliferate into the liver parenchyma. This was elegantly suggested by Stadtfeld et al[83] who demonstrated in a transgenic mouse model the minor role of the hematopoietic compartment in the adult liver ontogenetic development. Drug-induced liver injury has to be considered only as a tool for studying in vivo hepatocyte differentiation potential and no consensual protocol exists to date. Many questions are still opened: type of liver injury, time dependency of liver stimulus (acute vs chronic liver failure), use of drugs blocking host cell regeneration, relevance of injury after cell transplantation (compatibility with donor cell viability), etc. Globally, liver repopulation after stem cell transplantation remains limited. It is noteworthy that these data were obtained after single cell injection while for clinical purpose one would consider serial injections. Engraftment level has to be determined in this situation. By comparison, LCT can potentially reach higher repopulation levels[112] and, for that reason, is currently more valuable for clinical purpose. Conversely, some authors reported amazing repopulation levels with HSCs[73] or with UCB stem cells[16], but in both cases animal models were highly permissive and not representative of common cell transplant procedures. Methods for evaluation of cell engraftment are multiple and deal each with proper pitfalls[113]. For example, fluorescent in situ hybridization for detecting Y chromosome in a sex-mismatched transplantation can be difficult to interpret and, at low positivity levels, could be hampered by female microchimerism occurring after several litters[114]. The evaluation of in vivo cell differentiation is prominently performed by objectifying protein markers expression whereas immunoassays are often technically limited by antibodies affinity or specificity. For instance, the demonstration of in vivo expression of HepPar-1 (OCHE15 clone) should be questioned because of the antibody’s cross-reactivity between species. For that reason, the use of combined techniques is recommended for the identification of in vivo differentiating cells, as staining assays performed on serial sections and association of various techniques (ex: in situ hybridization, immunostaining, cell tracking with fluorescent molecules, flow cytometry, RT-PCR, cellular magnetic resonance) (Figure 2).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Mechanisms of liver repopulation after stem cell transplantation. A: Stem cell migration into the liver parenchyma after spleen infusion is guided mainly by the splenic and the portal vein flow. Homing of the cells is tightly regulated by chemoattractive agents (as SDF-1, HGF and SCF) secreted by liver cells under liver damage conditions[136], and acting respectively through the interaction with CXCR4, c-met and c-kit receptors of stem cells. MMP-9, expressed by host hepatocytes after injury, is implicated in the homing process through its action on the extracellular matrix. This process can be triggered by various types of liver injury; B: While reaching the portal vein, 70% to 80% of the infused cells are lost and phagocytosis by macrophages/phagocytes can be observed in the portal areas[137]. After 16-20 h post-infusion, the remaining cells enter the liver sinusoid after having crossed over the endothelial barrier rendered permeable by a local secretion of VEGF[137], and by the combined action of various MMPs[138]. The permeabilization of the endothelium by specific drugs owning toxicity against endothelial cells (as monocrotaline[139] or doxorubicin[140]) or acting on the permeation (VEGF[141142]) was described to enhance the repopulation rate of the infused cells. The penetration of the parenchyma is facilitated by the action of MMPs and the disruption of gap junctions[143]. The cell implantation creates an alteration of venous blood flow which can hamper the progression of the cells inside the parenchyma but can be alleviated by the use of vasodilators[144]. Globally, inducing liver injury facilitates cell integration by remodeling the liver architecture and by creating a local microenvironment favorable for the proliferation of the transplanted cells. This is mediated by the local secretion of cytokines/growth factors (HGF, FGF, TGFα). Cell implantation implicates the reformation of gap junctions that can be observed 3 to 7 d after transplantation. The implanted cells display variable cell phenotype parallel to the level of their hepatocyte differentiation; C: After integration, some cells will be cleared from the hepatic parenchyma. Dead cells lacking implantation stimulus or cell-to-cell interactions will be phagocytes by Kupffer cells. This can be inhibited by the use of gadolinium chloride[145] or by monocrotaline[139] which was demonstrated in animal models to improve the kinetics of cell implantation. Other cells will be rejected by the host immunological system (effector cells) and tools to alleviate this rejection are multiple (immunosuppression protocols, encapsulation of the infused cells, co-transplantation with cells owning immunosuppressive properties). FGF: Fibroblastic growth factor; HGF: Hepatocyte growth factor; MMP: Matrix metalloproteinase; SCF: Stem cell factor; SDF: Stromal derived factor; TGF: Transforming growth factor; VEGF: Vascular endothelial growth factor.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Analysis of liver engraftment of transplanted stem cells. Human BM-MSCs were transplanted into the liver of partially hepatectomized SCID mice and livers were screened after one month for analysis. A: Staining on serial sections for fibronectin, albumin and CK18 by immunohistochemistry revealed a co-expression of mesodermal and hepatocyte markers and confirmed the chimerical phenotype of hepatocyte differentiating MSCs (400 ×); B: The use of combined techniques for revealing the expression of human alu probe by in situ hybridization and of fibronectin by immunohistochemistry in a cell cluster (800 ×).
Demonstration of donor cell functionality through their metabolic activity

The gold-standard for evaluating in vivo differentiation is the detection of cell functionality. To this end, some authors reported albumin secretion in transplanted mice serum. Other reports on ‘in vivo functionality’ are argued on basis of the reduction of mortality rate, improvement of liver regeneration or of liver fibrosis[265981115118]. It has to be determined how these findings are the fact of indirect cell-to-cell interactions or of direct cell functionality. However, Lagasse et al[73] historically demonstrated the improvement of tyrosinemia disease in mouse after cell infusion whereas the selective pressure in this model is high and elicits fusion events.

Implication of cell fusion in the differentiation process

The fusion process implies that a cell inserts its genetic content into another cell to form a resulting unit that acquire the ‘host’ phenotype. The resultant product creates a heterokaryon in which the nuclei do not always fuse. The concept of fusion has emerged after experiments on co-culture of BM cells with ESCs[119120]. Fusion between hematopoietic cells and hepatocytes has been demonstrated[43121125] and invalidated[69126127]. This is explained by the conceptual diversity of these studies and perhaps the complexity of the process itself. For example, fusion events can be acted by HSCs[128] or require homing of these cells and implication of progeny, as highlighted by studies showing fusion between myelomonocytic lineages and hepatocytes[122125]. Interestingly, studies providing strong data about fusion used the FAH-/- model which produces mitotic and chromosomal abnormalities[129] that could strengthen the fusion process. It appears that selective pressure is necessary to induce relevant fusion processes which happen rarely in a non-injury model. How the cell fusion and plasticity phenomenon are parts of the same process or vary in importance according to the population used (stem cells versus committed cells[130]), has to be explored by tracing the donor cells in their route and studying signalling pathways. Interestingly, fusion events have, to date, never been described with MSCs[1021].

FROM BENCH TO CLINICAL SIDE

Literature concerning the use of stem cells for clinical therapy is unceasingly growing in many fields (including hematology, cardiology, neurology and orthopedics)[131]. However, to date, there is no clear documentation about long-term safety of such procedure[132133]. Multi-center consensual state-of-the-art about several clinical aspects is mandatory. First is the election of the appropriate clinical indication. In the hepatology field, liver-based inborn errors of metabolism are the most attractive candidate because of the possibility for elective treatment and, in some cases, the absence of global liver function impairment making technical procedures more feasible. The lack of liver injury may limit stem cells engraftment and differentiation. However, stem cells therapy remains relevant since small increases of the deficient enzyme activity can improve patients’ quality of life. In that case, the acquisition of a specific enzyme activity has to be demonstrated in vitro before cell transplantation. Liver cirrhosis/fibrosis has been considered: besides encouraging results, there is, to date, no evidence about a direct or a mediated cell involvement, nor about how the fibrosis could hamper cell implantation[116]. Before considering acute liver failure for stem cell therapy, it would be necessary to achieve a performing banking of functional hepatocyte-like cells. Globally, the possibility of repeated cell infusions could render cell therapy advantageous over OLT in patients whose disorder is not life-threatening (ex: Criggler-Najar patients). In this condition, whether stem cells could have an advantage on liver cells according to their proliferative capacity needs further assessment. Other points requiring consensus is the technique and route of cell delivery (surgically placed catheter vs transcutaneous injection), the amount of delivered cells and timing of infusions, and the protocol of immunosuppression.

CONCLUSION

The first challenge for considering stem cells for therapy is the proof of their safety at long term by in vitro and in vivo assays. The other major goal is the determination of their in vivo functionality in small animal models combining a metabolic disorder allowing objective screening of cell function and a permissive immunological context (SCID or knock-out mice, immunosuppression therapy in allotransplantation). Large animal models would provide definitive arguments about safety and functionality and allow an ideal setting for designing immunosuppression protocol and cell injection program. These models will be useful to attest the place of stem cells in liver cell therapy by comparison with LCT. Further research is also mandatory to examine the involvement of stem cells in the reconstitution of the non-parenchymal cell compartment after transplantation. Indeed, some cell populations have the potential to differentiate into endothelial cells[93134135] or could differentiate into mesodermal lineages similar to their phenotype (as hepatic stellate cells or fibroblasts) and as such interfere with the liver tissue architecture (Figure 3). Regarding the promising results obtained using MSCs as third-party for HSCs transplantation[2931] or in immunological pathologies[30], the immunomodulatory role of these cells as adjuvant in LCT or in OLT should be determined.

Figure 3
Figure 3 Involvement of stem cells in the regeneration of the liver parenchymal and non-parenchymal cell lineages. Schema shows the liver architecture and details the topography of the cell populations. In the table are resumed the cell fractions that could potentially be the targets of differentiation after transplantation of stem cells. Some of these differentiation potentials were documented with stem cells while other were contradicted and were thus exposed as controversial. Other differentiation pathways are purely hypothetical based on the embryonic origin of the stem cells. BC: Bile canalicule; CLV: Centrolobular vein; GJ: Gap junctions.
Footnotes

Peer reviewer: Takuji Torimura, MD, Second Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume City, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan

References
1.  Najimi M, Sokal E. Liver cell transplantation. Minerva Pediatr. 2005;57:243-257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Stephenne X, Najimi M, Sibille C, Nassogne MC, Smets F, Sokal EM. Sustained engraftment and tissue enzyme activity after liver cell transplantation for argininosuccinate lyase deficiency. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1317-1323.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Verfaillie CM, Pera MF, Lansdorp PM. Stem cells: hype and reality. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2002;130:369-391.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhjan RK, Lalykina KS. The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of guinea-pig bone marrow and spleen cells. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1970;3:393-403.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Javazon EH, Beggs KJ, Flake AW. Mesenchymal stem cells: paradoxes of passaging. Exp Hematol. 2004;32:414-425.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Bianco P, Riminucci M, Gronthos S, Robey PG. Bone marrow stromal stem cells: nature, biology, and potential applications. Stem Cells. 2001;19:180-192.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Barry FP, Murphy JM. Mesenchymal stem cells: clinical applications and biological characterization. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:568-584.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Lee KD, Kuo TK, Whang-Peng J, Chung YF, Lin CT, Chou SH, Chen JR, Chen YP, Lee OK. In vitro hepatic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Hepatology. 2004;40:1275-1284.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Anjos-Afonso F, Siapati EK, Bonnet D. In vivo contribution of murine mesenchymal stem cells into multiple cell-types under minimal damage conditions. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:5655-5664.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Aurich I, Mueller LP, Aurich H, Luetzkendorf J, Tisljar K, Dollinger MM, Schormann W, Walldorf J, Hengstler JG, Fleig WE. Functional integration of hepatocytes derived from human mesenchymal stem cells into mouse livers. Gut. 2007;56:405-415.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Beerheide W, von Mach MA, Ringel M, Fleckenstein C, Schumann S, Renzing N, Hildebrandt A, Brenner W, Jensen O, Gebhard S. Downregulation of beta2-microglobulin in human cord blood somatic stem cells after transplantation into livers of SCID-mice: an escape mechanism of stem cells? Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;294:1052-1063.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Chien CC, Yen BL, Lee FK, Lai TH, Chen YC, Chan SH, Huang HI. In vitro differentiation of human placenta-derived multipotent cells into hepatocyte-like cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1759-1768.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Fang B, Shi M, Liao L, Yang S, Liu Y, Zhao RC. Systemic infusion of FLK1(+) mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis in mice. Transplantation. 2004;78:83-88.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Hong SH, Gang EJ, Jeong JA, Ahn C, Hwang SH, Yang IH, Park HK, Han H, Kim H. In vitro differentiation of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells into hepatocyte-like cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;330:1153-1161.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Kang XQ, Zang WJ, Bao LJ, Li DL, Song TS, Xu XL, Yu XJ. Fibroblast growth factor-4 and hepatocyte growth factor induce differentiation of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells into hepatocytes. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:7461-7465.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Kogler G, Sensken S, Airey JA, Trapp T, Muschen M, Feldhahn N, Liedtke S, Sorg RV, Fischer J, Rosenbaum C. A new human somatic stem cell from placental cord blood with intrinsic pluripotent differentiation potential. J Exp Med. 2004;200:123-135.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Luk JM, Wang PP, Lee CK, Wang JH, Fan ST. Hepatic potential of bone marrow stromal cells: development of in vitro co-culture and intra-portal transplantation models. J Immunol Methods. 2005;305:39-47.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Ong SY, Dai H, Leong KW. Inducing hepatic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in pellet culture. Biomaterials. 2006;27:4087-4097.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Oyagi S, Hirose M, Kojima M, Okuyama M, Kawase M, Nakamura T, Ohgushi H, Yagi K. Therapeutic effect of transplanting HGF-treated bone marrow mesenchymal cells into CCl4-injured rats. J Hepatol. 2006;44:742-748.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Popp FC, Slowik P, Eggenhofer E, Renner P, Lang SA, Stoeltzing O, Geissler EK, Piso P, Schlitt HJ, Dahlke MH. No contribution of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells to liver regeneration in a rat model of prolonged hepatic injury. Stem Cells. 2007;25:639-645.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Sato Y, Araki H, Kato J, Nakamura K, Kawano Y, Kobune M, Sato T, Miyanishi K, Takayama T, Takahashi M. Human mesenchymal stem cells xenografted directly to rat liver are differentiated into human hepatocytes without fusion. Blood. 2005;106:756-763.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Seo MJ, Suh SY, Bae YC, Jung JS. Differentiation of human adipose stromal cells into hepatic lineage in vitro and in vivo. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;328:258-264.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Snykers S, Vanhaecke T, De Becker A, Papeleu P, Vinken M, Van Riet I, Rogiers V. Chromatin remodeling agent trichostatin A: a key-factor in the hepatic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells derived of adult bone marrow. BMC Dev Biol. 2007;7:24.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Talens-Visconti R, Bonora A, Jover R, Mirabet V, Carbonell F, Castell JV, Gomez-Lechon MJ. Hepatogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue in comparison with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:5834-5845.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Wang PP, Wang JH, Yan ZP, Hu MY, Lau GK, Fan ST, Luk JM. Expression of hepatocyte-like phenotypes in bone marrow stromal cells after HGF induction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;320:712-716.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Zhao DC, Lei JX, Chen R, Yu WH, Zhang XM, Li SN, Xiang P. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells protect against experimental liver fibrosis in rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:3431-3440.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Bartholomew A, Sturgeon C, Siatskas M, Ferrer K, McIntosh K, Patil S, Hardy W, Devine S, Ucker D, Deans R. Mesenchymal stem cells suppress lymphocyte proliferation in vitro and prolong skin graft survival in vivo. Exp Hematol. 2002;30:42-48.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Le Blanc K, Tammik L, Sundberg B, Haynesworth SE, Ringden O. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit and stimulate mixed lymphocyte cultures and mitogenic responses independently of the major histocompatibility complex. Scand J Immunol. 2003;57:11-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Fibbe WE, Noort WA. Mesenchymal stem cells and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;996:235-244.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Le Blanc K, Rasmusson I, Sundberg B, Gotherstrom C, Hassan M, Uzunel M, Ringden O. Treatment of severe acute graft-versus-host disease with third party haploidentical mesenchymal stem cells. Lancet. 2004;363:1439-1441.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Maitra B, Szekely E, Gjini K, Laughlin MJ, Dennis J, Haynesworth SE, Koc ON. Human mesenchymal stem cells support unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cells and suppress T-cell activation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004;33:597-604.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  Aggarwal S, Pittenger MF. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood. 2005;105:1815-1822.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Wognum AW, Eaves AC, Thomas TE. Identification and isolation of hematopoietic stem cells. Arch Med Res. 2003;34:461-475.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  McNiece I. Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic cells. Part II: control of proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells. Exp Hematol. 2004;32:692.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  McNiece I. Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic cells. Exp Hematol. 2004;32:409-410.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Dao MA, Nolta JA. CD34: to select or not to select? That is the question. Leukemia. 2000;14:773-776.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Alison MR, Poulsom R, Jeffery R, Dhillon AP, Quaglia A, Jacob J, Novelli M, Prentice G, Williamson J, Wright NA. Hepatocytes from non-hepatic adult stem cells. Nature. 2000;406:257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Arikura J, Inagaki M, Huiling X, Ozaki A, Onodera K, Ogawa K, Kasai S. Colonization of albumin-producing hepatocytes derived from transplanted F344 rat bone marrow cells in the liver of congenic Nagase's analbuminemic rats. J Hepatol. 2004;41:215-221.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Cai YF, Zhen ZJ, Min J, Fang TL, Chu ZH, Chen JS. Selection, proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow-derived liver stem cells with a culture system containing cholestatic serum in vitro. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:3308-3312.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Dahlke MH, Popp FC, Bahlmann FH, Aselmann H, Jager MD, Neipp M, Piso P, Klempnauer J, Schlitt HJ. Liver regeneration in a retrorsine/CCl4-induced acute liver failure model: do bone marrow-derived cells contribute? J Hepatol. 2003;39:365-373.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Fujii H, Hirose T, Oe S, Yasuchika K, Azuma H, Fujikawa T, Nagao M, Yamaoka Y. Contribution of bone marrow cells to liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in mice. J Hepatol. 2002;36:653-659.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Gao Z, McAlister VC, Williams GM. Repopulation of liver endothelium by bone-marrow-derived cells. Lancet. 2001;357:932-933.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
43.  Ishikawa F, Drake CJ, Yang S, Fleming P, Minamiguchi H, Visconti RP, Crosby CV, Argraves WS, Harada M, Key LL Jr. Transplanted human cord blood cells give rise to hepatocytes in engrafted mice. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;996:174-185.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
44.  Kakinuma S, Tanaka Y, Chinzei R, Watanabe M, Shimizu-Saito K, Hara Y, Teramoto K, Arii S, Sato C, Takase K. Human umbilical cord blood as a source of transplantable hepatic progenitor cells. Stem Cells. 2003;21:217-227.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
45.  Kakinuma S, Asahina K, Okamura K, Teramoto K, Tateno C, Yoshizato K, Tanaka Y, Yasumizu T, Sakamoto N, Watanabe M. Human cord blood cells transplanted into chronically damaged liver exhibit similar characteristics to functional hepatocytes. Transplant Proc. 2007;39:240-243.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  Kanazawa Y, Verma IM. Little evidence of bone marrow-derived hepatocytes in the replacement of injured liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100 Suppl 1:11850-11853.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Khurana S, Mukhopadhyay A. Characterization of the potential subpopulation of bone marrow cells involved in the repair of injured liver tissue. Stem Cells. 2007;25:1439-1447.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  Menthena A, Deb N, Oertel M, Grozdanov PN, Sandhu J, Shah S, Guha C, Shafritz DA, Dabeva MD. Bone marrow progenitors are not the source of expanding oval cells in injured liver. Stem Cells. 2004;22:1049-1061.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
49.  Misawa R, Ise H, Takahashi M, Morimoto H, Kobayashi E, Miyagawa S, Ikeda U. Development of liver regenerative therapy using glycoside-modified bone marrow cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;342:434-440.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
50.  Miyazaki M, Akiyama I, Sakaguchi M, Nakashima E, Okada M, Kataoka K, Huh NH. Improved conditions to induce hepatocytes from rat bone marrow cells in culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;298:24-30.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
51.  Miyazaki M, Masaka T, Akiyama I, Nakashima E, Sakaguchi M, Huh NH. Propagation of adult rat bone marrow-derived hepatocyte-like cells by serial passages in vitro. Cell Transplant. 2004;13:385-391.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
52.  Oh SH, Miyazaki M, Kouchi H, Inoue Y, Sakaguchi M, Tsuji T, Shima N, Higashio K, Namba M. Hepatocyte growth factor induces differentiation of adult rat bone marrow cells into a hepatocyte lineage in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;279:500-504.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
53.  Okumoto K, Saito T, Hattori E, Ito JI, Adachi T, Takeda T, Sugahara K, Watanabe H, Saito K, Togashi H. Differentiation of bone marrow cells into cells that express liver-specific genes in vitro: implication of the Notch signals in differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;304:691-695.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
54.  Petersen BE, Bowen WC, Patrene KD, Mars WM, Sullivan AK, Murase N, Boggs SS, Greenberger JS, Goff JP. Bone marrow as a potential source of hepatic oval cells. Science. 1999;284:1168-1170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
55.  Sato Y, Matsui K, Ajiki T, Igarashi Y, Takahashi M, Murakami T, Hakamata Y, Tabata Y, Kobayashi E. Can a bone marrow cell contribute to organ regeneration? In vivo analysis using transgenic rats with reporter genes. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:273-275.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
56.  Shi XL, Qiu YD, Wu XY, Xie T, Zhu ZH, Chen LL, Li L, Ding YT. In vitro differentiation of mouse bone marrow mononuclear cells into hepatocyte-like cells. Hepatol Res. 2005;31:223-231.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
57.  Shyu MK, Yuan RH, Shih JC, Wu MZ, Chen HL, Kuo YC, Chien CL, Chow LP, Chen HL, Hsieh FJ. Kinetics and functional assay of liver repopulation after human cord blood transplantation. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39:455-465.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
58.  Tang XP, Yang X, Tan H, Ding YL, Zhang M, Wang WL. Clinical and experimental study on therapeutic effect of umbilical cord blood transplantation on severe viral hepatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:1999-2003.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
59.  Terai S, Sakaida I, Yamamoto N, Omori K, Watanabe T, Ohata S, Katada T, Miyamoto K, Shinoda K, Nishina H. An in vivo model for monitoring trans-differentiation of bone marrow cells into functional hepatocytes. J Biochem (Tokyo). 2003;134:551-558.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
60.  Theise ND, Nimmakayalu M, Gardner R, Illei PB, Morgan G, Teperman L, Henegariu O, Krause DS. Liver from bone marrow in humans. Hepatology. 2000;32:11-16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
61.  Theise ND, Badve S, Saxena R, Henegariu O, Sell S, Crawford JM, Krause DS. Derivation of hepatocytes from bone marrow cells in mice after radiation-induced myeloablation. Hepatology. 2000;31:235-240.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
62.  Turrini P, Monego G, Gonzalez J, Cicuzza S, Bonanno G, Zelano G, Rosenthal N, Paonessa G, Laufer R, Padron J. Human hepatocytes in mice receiving pre-immune injection with human cord blood cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;326:66-73.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
63.  Yamazaki S, Miki K, Hasegawa K, Sata M, Takayama T, Makuuchi M. Sera from liver failure patients and a demethylating agent stimulate transdifferentiation of murine bone marrow cells into hepatocytes in coculture with nonparenchymal liver cells. J Hepatol. 2003;39:17-23.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
64.  Almeida-Porada G, Porada CD, Chamberlain J, Torabi A, Zanjani ED. Formation of human hepatocytes by human hematopoietic stem cells in sheep. Blood. 2004;104:2582-2590.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
65.  Cantz T, Sharma AD, Jochheim-Richter A, Arseniev L, Klein C, Manns MP, Ott M. Reevaluation of bone marrow-derived cells as a source for hepatocyte regeneration. Cell Transplant. 2004;13:659-666.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
66.  Danet GH, Luongo JL, Butler G, Lu MM, Tenner AJ, Simon MC, Bonnet DA. C1qRp defines a new human stem cell population with hematopoietic and hepatic potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:10441-10445.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
67.  Fiegel HC, Lioznov MV, Cortes-Dericks L, Lange C, Kluth D, Fehse B, Zander AR. Liver-specific gene expression in cultured human hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2003;21:98-104.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
68.  Inderbitzin D, Avital I, Keogh A, Beldi G, Quarta M, Gloor B, Candinas D. Interleukin-3 induces hepatocyte-specific metabolic activity in bone marrow-derived liver stem cells. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:69-74.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
69.  Jang YY, Collector MI, Baylin SB, Diehl AM, Sharkis SJ. Hematopoietic stem cells convert into liver cells within days without fusion. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:532-539.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
70.  Kollet O, Shivtiel S, Chen YQ, Suriawinata J, Thung SN, Dabeva MD, Kahn J, Spiegel A, Dar A, Samira S. HGF, SDF-1, and MMP-9 are involved in stress-induced human CD34+ stem cell recruitment to the liver. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:160-169.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
71.  Korbling M, Katz RL, Khanna A, Ruifrok AC, Rondon G, Albitar M, Champlin RE, Estrov Z. Hepatocytes and epithelial cells of donor origin in recipients of peripheral-blood stem cells. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:738-746.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
72.  Krause DS, Theise ND, Collector MI, Henegariu O, Hwang S, Gardner R, Neutzel S, Sharkis SJ. Multi-organ, multi-lineage engraftment by a single bone marrow-derived stem cell. Cell. 2001;105:369-377.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
73.  Lagasse E, Connors H, Al-Dhalimy M, Reitsma M, Dohse M, Osborne L, Wang X, Finegold M, Weissman IL, Grompe M. Purified hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo. Nat Med. 2000;6:1229-1234.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
74.  Mallet VO, Mitchell C, Mezey E, Fabre M, Guidotti JE, Renia L, Coulombel L, Kahn A, Gilgenkrantz H. Bone marrow transplantation in mice leads to a minor population of hepatocytes that can be selectively amplified in vivo. Hepatology. 2002;35:799-804.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
75.  Wagers AJ, Sherwood RI, Christensen JL, Weissman IL. Little evidence for developmental plasticity of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Science. 2002;297:2256-2259.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
76.  Wang X, Montini E, Al-Dhalimy M, Lagasse E, Finegold M, Grompe M. Kinetics of liver repopulation after bone marrow transplantation. Am J Pathol. 2002;161:565-574.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
77.  Wang X, Ge S, McNamara G, Hao QL, Crooks GM, Nolta JA. Albumin-expressing hepatocyte-like cells develop in the livers of immune-deficient mice that received transplants of highly purified human hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2003;101:4201-4208.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
78.  Wang Y, Nan X, Li Y, Zhang R, Yue W, Yan F, Pei X. Induction of umbilical cord blood-derived beta2m-c-Met+ cells into hepatocyte-like cells by coculture with CFSC/HGF cells. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:635-643.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
79.  Yamada Y, Nishimoto E, Mitsuya H, Yonemura Y. In vitro transdifferentiation of adult bone marrow Sca-1+ cKit- cells cocultured with fetal liver cells into hepatic-like cells without fusion. Exp Hematol. 2006;34:97-106.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
80.  Yamamoto N, Terai S, Ohata S, Watanabe T, Omori K, Shinoda K, Miyamoto K, Katada T, Sakaida I, Nishina H. A subpopulation of bone marrow cells depleted by a novel antibody, anti-Liv8, is useful for cell therapy to repair damaged liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;313:1110-1118.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
81.  Di Campli C, Piscaglia AC, Pierelli L, Rutella S, Bonanno G, Alison MR, Mariotti A, Vecchio FM, Nestola M, Monego G. A human umbilical cord stem cell rescue therapy in a murine model of toxic liver injury. Dig Liver Dis. 2004;36:603-613.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
82.  Lian G, Wang C, Teng C, Zhang C, Du L, Zhong Q, Miao C, Ding M, Deng H. Failure of hepatocyte marker-expressing hematopoietic progenitor cells to efficiently convert into hepatocytes in vitro. Exp Hematol. 2006;34:348-358.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
83.  Stadtfeld M, Graf T. Assessing the role of hematopoietic plasticity for endothelial and hepatocyte development by non-invasive lineage tracing. Development. 2005;132:203-213.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
84.  Yamaguchi K, Itoh K, Masuda T, Umemura A, Baum C, Itoh Y, Okanoue T, Fujita J. In vivo selection of transduced hematopoietic stem cells and little evidence of their conversion into hepatocytes in vivo. J Hepatol. 2006;45:681-687.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
85.  Thorgeirsson SS, Grisham JW. Hematopoietic cells as hepatocyte stem cells: a critical review of the evidence. Hepatology. 2006;43:2-8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
86.  Oh SH, Witek RP, Bae SH, Zheng D, Jung Y, Piscaglia AC, Petersen BE. Bone marrow-derived hepatic oval cells differentiate into hepatocytes in 2-acetylaminofluorene/partial hepatectomy-induced liver regeneration. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:1077-1087.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
87.  Fougere-Deschatrette C, Imaizumi-Scherrer T, Strick-Marchand H, Morosan S, Charneau P, Kremsdorf D, Faust DM, Weiss MC. Plasticity of hepatic cell differentiation: bipotential adult mouse liver clonal cell lines competent to differentiate in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cells. 2006;24:2098-2109.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
88.  Mitaka T, Kojima T, Mizuguchi T, Mochizuki Y. Growth and maturation of small hepatocytes isolated from adult rat liver. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;214:310-317.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
89.  Ikeda S, Mitaka T, Harada K, Sugimoto S, Hirata K, Mochizuki Y. Proliferation of rat small hepatocytes after long-term cryopreservation. J Hepatol. 2002;37:7-14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
90.  Sidler Pfandler MA, Hochli M, Inderbitzin D, Meier PJ, Stieger B. Small hepatocytes in culture develop polarized transporter expression and differentiation. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:4077-4087.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
91.  Tsao MS, Smith JD, Nelson KG, Grisham JW. A diploid epithelial cell line from normal adult rat liver with phenotypic properties of 'oval' cells. Exp Cell Res. 1984;154:38-52.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
92.  Khuu DN, Najimi M, Sokal EM. Epithelial cells with hepatobiliary phenotype: is it another stem cell candidate for healthy adult human liver? World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:1554-1560.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
93.  Herrera MB, Bruno S, Buttiglieri S, Tetta C, Gatti S, Deregibus MC, Bussolati B, Camussi G. Isolation and characterization of a stem cell population from adult human liver. Stem Cells. 2006;24:2840-2850.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
94.  Najimi M, Khuu DN, Lysy PA, Jazouli N, Abarca J, Sempoux C, Sokal EM. Adult derived human liver mesenchymal-like cells as a potential progenitors reservoir of hepatocytes? Cell Transplant. 2007;24:In press.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
95.  Walkup MH, Gerber DA. Hepatic stem cells: in search of. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1833-1840.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
96.  Koenig S, Krause P, Drabent B, Schaeffner I, Christ B, Schwartz P, Unthan-Fechner K, Probst I. The expression of mesenchymal, neural and haematopoietic stem cell markers in adult hepatocytes proliferating in vitro. J Hepatol. 2006;44:1115-1124.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
97.  Elaut G, Henkens T, Papeleu P, Snykers S, Vinken M, Vanhaecke T, Rogiers V. Molecular mechanisms underlying the dedifferentiation process of isolated hepatocytes and their cultures. Curr Drug Metab. 2006;7:629-660.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
98.  Frankel MS. In search of stem cell policy. Science. 2000;287:1397.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
99.  Erdo F, Buhrle C, Blunk J, Hoehn M, Xia Y, Fleischmann B, Focking M, Kustermann E, Kolossov E, Hescheler J. Host-dependent tumorigenesis of embryonic stem cell transplantation in experimental stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003;23:780-785.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
100.  Wu DC, Boyd AS, Wood KJ. Embryonic stem cell transplantation: potential applicability in cell replacement therapy and regenerative medicine. Front Biosci. 2007;12:4525-4535.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
101.  Wainwright SP, Williams C, Michael M, Farsides B, Cribb A. Ethical boundary-work in the embryonic stem cell laboratory. Sociol Health Illn. 2006;28:732-748.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
102.  Zhao Y, Glesne D, Huberman E. A human peripheral blood monocyte-derived subset acts as pluripotent stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:2426-2431.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
103.  Ruhnke M, Nussler AK, Ungefroren H, Hengstler JG, Kremer B, Hoeckh W, Gottwald T, Heeckt P, Fandrich F. Human monocyte-derived neohepatocytes: a promising alternative to primary human hepatocytes for autologous cell therapy. Transplantation. 2005;79:1097-1103.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
104.  Lysy PA, Smets F, Sibille C, Najimi M, Sokal EM. Human skin fibroblasts: From mesodermal to hepatocyte-like differentiation. Hepatology. 2007;46:1574-1585.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
105.  Pomerantz J, Blau HM. Nuclear reprogramming: a key to stem cell function in regenerative medicine. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:810-816.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
106.  Lysy PA, Campard D, Smets F, Malaise J, Mourad M, Najimi M, Sokal EM. Persistence of a Chimerical Phenotype after Hepatocyte Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Cell Prolif. 2007;6:In press.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
107.  Avital I, Inderbitzin D, Aoki T, Tyan DB, Cohen AH, Ferraresso C, Rozga J, Arnaout WS, Demetriou AA. Isolation, characterization, and transplantation of bone marrow-derived hepatocyte stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;288:156-164.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
108.  Avital I, Feraresso C, Aoki T, Hui T, Rozga J, Demetriou A, Muraca M. Bone marrow-derived liver stem cell and mature hepatocyte engraftment in livers undergoing rejection. Surgery. 2002;132:384-390.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
109.  Hengstler JG, Brulport M, Schormann W, Bauer A, Hermes M, Nussler AK, Fandrich F, Ruhnke M, Ungefroren H, Griffin L. Generation of human hepatocytes by stem cell technology: definition of the hepatocyte. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2005;1:61-74.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
110.  Bhatia SN, Balis UJ, Yarmush ML, Toner M. Effect of cell-cell interactions in preservation of cellular phenotype: cocultivation of hepatocytes and nonparenchymal cells. FASEB J. 1999;13:1883-1900.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
111.  Peister A, Mellad JA, Larson BL, Hall BM, Gibson LF, Prockop DJ. Adult stem cells from bone marrow (MSCs) isolated from different strains of inbred mice vary in surface epitopes, rates of proliferation, and differentiation potential. Blood. 2004;103:1662-1668.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
112.  Mas VR, Maluf DG, Thompson M, Ferreira-Gonzalez A, Fisher RA. Engraftment measurement in human liver tissue after liver cell transplantation by short tandem repeats analysis. Cell Transplant. 2004;13:231-236.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
113.  Brazelton TR, Blau HM. Optimizing techniques for tracking transplanted stem cells in vivo. Stem Cells. 2005;23:1251-1265.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
114.  Guettier C, Sebagh M, Buard J, Feneux D, Ortin-Serrano M, Gigou M, Tricottet V, Reynes M, Samuel D, Feray C. Male cell microchimerism in normal and diseased female livers from fetal life to adulthood. Hepatology. 2005;42:35-43.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
115.  Allen KJ, Cheah DM, Lee XL, Pettigrew-Buck NE, Vadolas J, Mercer JF, Ioannou PA, Williamson R. The potential of bone marrow stem cells to correct liver dysfunction in a mouse model of Wilson's disease. Cell Transplant. 2004;13:765-773.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
116.  Lorenzini S, Andreone P. Stem cell therapy for human liver cirrhosis: a cautious analysis of the results. Stem Cells. 2007;25:2383-2384.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
117.  Sakaida I, Terai S, Yamamoto N, Aoyama K, Ishikawa T, Nishina H, Okita K. Transplantation of bone marrow cells reduces CCl4-induced liver fibrosis in mice. Hepatology. 2004;40:1304-1311.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
118.  Yannaki E, Athanasiou E, Xagorari A, Constantinou V, Batsis I, Kaloyannidis P, Proya E, Anagnostopoulos A, Fassas A. G-CSF-primed hematopoietic stem cells or G-CSF per se accelerate recovery and improve survival after liver injury, predominantly by promoting endogenous repair programs. Exp Hematol. 2005;33:108-119.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
119.  Terada N, Hamazaki T, Oka M, Hoki M, Mastalerz DM, Nakano Y, Meyer EM, Morel L, Petersen BE, Scott EW. Bone marrow cells adopt the phenotype of other cells by spontaneous cell fusion. Nature. 2002;416:542-545.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
120.  Ying QL, Nichols J, Evans EP, Smith AG. Changing potency by spontaneous fusion. Nature. 2002;416:545-548.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
121.  Alvarez-Dolado M, Pardal R, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Fike JR, Lee HO, Pfeffer K, Lois C, Morrison SJ, Alvarez-Buylla A. Fusion of bone-marrow-derived cells with Purkinje neurons, cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes. Nature. 2003;425:968-973.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
122.  Camargo FD, Finegold M, Goodell MA. Hematopoietic myelomonocytic cells are the major source of hepatocyte fusion partners. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:1266-1270.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
123.  Vassilopoulos G, Wang PR, Russell DW. Transplanted bone marrow regenerates liver by cell fusion. Nature. 2003;422:901-904.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
124.  Wang X, Willenbring H, Akkari Y, Torimaru Y, Foster M, Al-Dhalimy M, Lagasse E, Finegold M, Olson S, Grompe M. Cell fusion is the principal source of bone-marrow-derived hepatocytes. Nature. 2003;422:897-901.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
125.  Willenbring H, Bailey AS, Foster M, Akkari Y, Dorrell C, Olson S, Finegold M, Fleming WH, Grompe M. Myelomonocytic cells are sufficient for therapeutic cell fusion in liver. Nat Med. 2004;10:744-748.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
126.  Harris RG, Herzog EL, Bruscia EM, Grove JE, Van Arnam JS, Krause DS. Lack of a fusion requirement for development of bone marrow-derived epithelia. Science. 2004;305:90-93.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
127.  Newsome PN, Johannessen I, Boyle S, Dalakas E, McAulay KA, Samuel K, Rae F, Forrester L, Turner ML, Hayes PC. Human cord blood-derived cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in the mouse liver with no evidence of cellular fusion. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1891-1900.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
128.  Tanabe Y, Tajima F, Nakamura Y, Shibasaki E, Wakejima M, Shimomura T, Murai R, Murawaki Y, Hashiguchi K, Kanbe T. Analyses to clarify rich fractions in hepatic progenitor cells from human umbilical cord blood and cell fusion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;324:711-718.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
129.  Jorquera R, Tanguay RM. Fumarylacetoacetate, the metabolite accumulating in hereditary tyrosinemia, activates the ERK pathway and induces mitotic abnormalities and genomic instability. Hum Mol Genet. 2001;10:1741-1752.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
130.  Jang YY, Sharkis SJ. Metamorphosis from bone marrow derived primitive stem cells to functional liver cells. Cell Cycle. 2004;3:980-982.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
131.  Giordano A, Galderisi U, Marino IR. From the laboratory bench to the patient's bedside: an update on clinical trials with mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Physiol. 2007;211:27-35.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
132.  Nussler A, Konig S, Ott M, Sokal E, Christ B, Thasler W, Brulport M, Gabelein G, Schormann W, Schulze M. Present status and perspectives of cell-based therapies for liver diseases. J Hepatol. 2006;45:144-159.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
133.  Prockop DJ, Olson SD. Clinical trials with adult stem/progenitor cells for tissue repair: let's not overlook some essential precautions. Blood. 2007;109:3147-3151.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
134.  Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, Schwartz RE, Keene CD, Ortiz-Gonzalez XR, Reyes M, Lenvik T, Lund T, Blackstad M. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature. 2002;418:41-49.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
135.  Wu KH, Zhou B, Lu SH, Feng B, Yang SG, Du WT, Gu DS, Han ZC, Liu YL. In vitro and in vivo differentiation of human umbilical cord derived stem cells into endothelial cells. J Cell Biochem. 2007;100:608-616.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
136.  Dalakas E, Newsome PN, Harrison DJ, Plevris JN. Hematopoietic stem cell trafficking in liver injury. FASEB J. 2005;19:1225-1231.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
137.  Gupta S, Rajvanshi P, Sokhi R, Slehria S, Yam A, Kerr A, Novikoff PM. Entry and integration of transplanted hepatocytes in rat liver plates occur by disruption of hepatic sinusoidal endothelium. Hepatology. 1999;29:509-519.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
138.  Son BR, Marquez-Curtis LA, Kucia M, Wysoczynski M, Turner AR, Ratajczak J, Ratajczak MZ, Janowska-Wieczorek A. Migration of bone marrow and cord blood mesenchymal stem cells in vitro is regulated by stromal-derived factor-1-CXCR4 and hepatocyte growth factor-c-met axes and involves matrix metalloproteinases. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1254-1264.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
139.  Joseph B, Kumaran V, Berishvili E, Bhargava KK, Palestro CJ, Gupta S. Monocrotaline promotes transplanted cell engraftment and advances liver repopulation in rats via liver conditioning. Hepatology. 2006;44:1411-1420.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
140.  Kim KS, Joseph B, Inada M, Gupta S. Regulation of hepatocyte engraftment and proliferation after cytotoxic drug-induced perturbation of the rat liver. Transplantation. 2005;80:653-659.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
141.  Kedem A, Perets A, Gamlieli-Bonshtein I, Dvir-Ginzberg M, Mizrahi S, Cohen S. Vascular endothelial growth factor-releasing scaffolds enhance vascularization and engraftment of hepatocytes transplanted on liver lobes. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:715-722.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
142.  Shani-Peretz H, Tsiperson V, Shoshani G, Veitzman E, Neufeld G, Baruch Y. HVEGF165 increases survival of transplanted hepatocytes within portal radicles: suggested mechanism for early cell engraftment. Cell Transplant. 2005;14:49-57.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
143.  Gupta S, Rajvanshi P, Malhi H, Slehria S, Sokhi RP, Vasa SR, Dabeva M, Shafritz DA, Kerr . Cell transplantation causes loss of gap junctions and activates GGT expression permanently in host liver. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000;279:G815-G826.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
144.  Slehria S, Rajvanshi P, Ito Y, Sokhi RP, Bhargava KK, Palestro CJ, McCuskey RS, Gupta S. Hepatic sinusoidal vasodilators improve transplanted cell engraftment and ameliorate microcirculatory perturbations in the liver. Hepatology. 2002;35:1320-1328.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
145.  Joseph B, Malhi H, Bhargava KK, Palestro CJ, McCuskey RS, Gupta S. Kupffer cells participate in early clearance of syngeneic hepatocytes transplanted in the rat liver. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:1677-1685.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]