Rapid Communication Open Access
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2008; 14(16): 2534-2539
Published online Apr 28, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.2534
Alteration of sister chromatid exchange frequencies in gastric cancer and chronic atrophic gastritis patients with and without H pylori infection
Ali Karaman, Department of Medical Genetics, State Hospital, Erzurum 25240, Turkey
Dogan Nasir Binici, Department of Internal Medicine, State Hospital, Erzurum 25240, Turkey
Mehmet Esref Kabalar, Ali Kurt, Department of Pathology, State Hospital, Erzurum 25240, Turkey
Hakan Dursun, Department of Gastroenterology, State Hospital, Erzurum 25240, Turkey
Author contributions: Karaman A performed SCE analysis in the lymphocytes of all subjects, analyzed all of the data and wrote the article; Binici DN and Dursun H performed endoscopic operations; Kabalar EM and Kurt A analyzed all biopsy materials.
Correspondence to: Ali Karaman, MD, Erzurum State Hospital, (Erzurum Numune Hastanesi), Department of Medical Genetics, Erzurum 25240, Turkey. alikaramandr@hotmail.com
Telephone: +90-442-2321139
Fax: +90-442-2321390
Received: November 23, 2007
Revised: February 15, 2008
Published online: April 28, 2008

Abstract

AIM: To determine, by counting sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequencies, whether genetic impairment and DNA damage have an effect on the pathogenesis of gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS: Analysis of SCE is a cytogenetic technique used to show DNA damage as a result of an exchange of DNA fragments between sister chromatids. We analyzed SCE frequency in 24 patients with GC, 26 patients with chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG), and 15 normal controls. The presence of H pylori was confirmed by urease test, toluidine-blue stain and hematoxylin-eosin stain.

RESULTS: SCE was significantly increased in H pylori-negative GC patients, and in H pylori-negative CAG patients compared with controls (7.41 ± 1.36 and 6.92 ± 1.20, respectively, vs 5.54 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). There was no difference in the SCE frequency between H pylori-negative GC patients and H pylori-negative CAG patients (P > 0.05). On other hand, the SCE frequencies in H pylori-positive GC patients were higher than those in H pylori-positive CAG patients (9.20 ± 0.94 vs 7.93 ± 0.81, P < 0.01). Furthermore, H pylori-positive GC patients had a higher SCE frequency than H pylori-negative GC patients (9.20 ± 0.94 vs 7.41 ± 1.36, P < 0.001). Similarly, a significant difference was detected between H pylori-positive CAG patients and H pylori-negative CAG patients (7.93 ± 0.81 vs 6.92 ± 1.20, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: We suggest the increased SCE in patients reflects a genomic instability that may be operative in gastric carcinogenesis.

Key Words: Gastric carcinoma; Chronic atrophic gastritis; Pathogenesis; Helicobacter pylori infection; Sister chromatid exchange



INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death and the fourth most common cancer in terms of new cases worldwide[1]. The development of gastric cancer in humans has been shown to be a multi-step process, ranging from chronic gastritis to atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and finally, invasive cancer[25].

Multiple genetic and epigenetic alterations in oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, cell-cycle regulators, cell adhesion molecules, DNA repair genes and genetic instability, as well as telomerase activation, are implicated in the multi-step process of gastric carcinogenesis. p53, a tumor suppressor gene is thought to play a critical role in the multistep process of gastric carcinogenesis[69]. Inactivation of p53 by 17p (p53), loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and mutation seems to be an early event in neoplastic progression in gastric carcinomas, because it develops in diploid cells before aneuploidy and other LOH events involving chromosomes 1, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11 and 12[1011].

H pylori is an important human pathogen, responsible for most cases of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, gastric cancer and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid lymphoma[1216]. Evidence that it acts as a carcinogen has come mainly from epidemiological studies[1719] and animal studies[20]. The working group of the Agency for Research on Cancer reported in 1994 that H pylori is indeed a group-1 carcinogen[21].

H pylori is a carcinogen in humans, although it is not thought to cause gastric cancer directly. It may, however, provide a suitable environment, by causing chronic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia, for neoplastic changes. H pylori infection leads to changes in many factors, such as the vitamin C content of gastric juice, the levels of reactive oxygen metabolites in the tissues and epithelial cell proliferation, which are important in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer[22].

The sister chromatid exchange (SCE) phenomenon is widely used as a reliable and sensitive indicator of chromosome (DNA) instability, since the SCE patterns can reveal a general genome instability[23]. Variations in DNA repair mechanisms or detoxifying enzymes have been implicated as causing genetic susceptibility associated with cancer[24]. SCE in peripheral lymphocytes has been widely used to assess exposure to mutagens and carcinogens[2527]. The SCE frequency was found to be significantly higher in individuals with Werner syndrome, Bloom’s syndrome, and myelodysplastic disease than in their control groups. These diseases are known to be associated with genomic instability[2829].

Several groups of investigators have suggested active oxygen species may be implicated in the production of high basal SCE frequencies in chromosome instability syndrome cells, because oxygen free radicals are thought to be responsible for chromosome damage in these cells[30]. Oxidative damage to DNA over time can cause changes to both the structure and function of chromosomes. These changes in the genetic code may lead to cancer and other chronic diseases[3132]. The mutagenic effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been detected in human lymphocytes by using the SCE technique; elevated ROS in cells can cause an increase in mitotic recombination frequency[33]. Recently, the genotoxicity of ROS has been well established, and oxidative stress has been shown to cause genomic damage[3435].

The aim of this study was to determine, by counting SCE frequencies, whether genetic impairment and DNA damage have an effect on the pathogenesis of GC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients

This study was conducted between February 2007 and June 2007 in the Erzurum State Hospital. We performed SCE analysis in 24 non-smoking (8 females and 16 males) patients with GC (age, mean ± SE: 62.2 ± 5.94 years), 26 non-smoking (7 females and 19 males) patients with CAG (age, mean ± SE: 54.3 ± 12.27 years), and 15 healthy, non-smoking (6 females and 9 males) controls (age, mean ± SE: 51.26 ± 6.27 years). Nine of the 24 GC patients were infected with H pylori. Nine of the 26 CAG patients infected with H pylori. The presence of H pylori was confirmed by the urease test, toluidine-blue stain and hematoxylin-eosin stain. The patients were selected from non-smoking and nonalcoholic subjects. None of the subjects had a history of viral infection, bacterial infection or any metabolic diseases. The patients had not been treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy during the last 4 mo. The patient and control groups were chosen for their similar habits. The hospital Ethical Committee approved the human study. All patients were analyzed prior to treatment.

Sister chromatid exchange analysis

For SCE analysis, 2 mL of heparinized blood was drawn from each individual. Cultures were established by adding 0.5 mL of blood to 5 mL karyotyping medium (Biological Industries, Beit Haemek, Israel) with 2% phytohaemagglutinin M (PHA) (Biological Industries, Beit Haemek, Israel), and incubating for 24 h at 37°C. A 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) (Sigma, USA) solution at a final concentration of 5 &mgr;g/mL was added. Lymphocytes were cultured in the dark for 48 h and metaphases were blocked during the last 2 h with colcemid (Biological Industries, Beit Haemek, Israel) at a final concentration of 0.1 &mgr;g/mL. Further processing included hypotonic treatment, fixation, slide preparation and fluorescein plus Giemsa (FPG) staining for the detection of SCE[36]. Fifty second-division metaphases were scored on coded slides by a single observer as the number of SCEs/cell per subject. The SCE data were analyzed statistically by Student’s t-test.

RESULTS

The associations of GC and CAG with SCE frequencies in H pylori-positive and negative groups are shown in Table 1. According to these results, there was no difference in mean SCE frequency between H pylori-negative GC patients and H pylori-negative CAG patients (7.41 ± 1.36 vs 6.92 ± 1.20 per metaphase, respectively; P > 0.05); however, the mean SCE frequencies of both patient groups were significantly higher than that of the control group (5.54 ± 0.8 per metaphase, P < 0.001 for both patient groups). On the other hand, the mean SCE frequency of H pylori-positive GC patients was significantly higher than that of H pylori-positive CAG patients (9.20 ± 0.94 vs 7.93 ± 0.81 per metaphase, respectively; P < 0.01). Furthermore, the mean SCE frequency in H pylori-positive GC patients was higher than that in H pylori-negative GC patients (9.20 ± 0.94 vs 7.41 ± 1.36 per metaphase, respectively P < 0.001). Similarly, H pylori-positive CAG patients had a higher mean SCE frequency than H pylori-negative CAG patients (7.93 ± 0.81 vs 6.92 ± 1.20 per metaphase, respectively P < 0.05).

Table 1 SCE frequency in H pylori-positive and -negative groups of patients and healthy controls (mean ± SE).
Sex F/MnAge, yrAge at diagnosis, yrSCE
GC PatientsH pylori-positive3/6953.77 ± 10.2753.33 ± 9.269.20 ± 0.94
H pylori-negative5/101563.20 ± 6.9863.06 ± 7.067.41 ± 1.36
CAG PatientsH pylori-positive2/7951.33 ± 11.2150.11 ± 15.167.93 ± 0.81
H pylori-negative5/121757.23 ± 13.5856.65 ± 13.656.92 ± 1.2
Controls6/91551.26 ± 6.275.54 ± 0.8
DISCUSSION

Gastric cancer is still a common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, despite improved diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Hence, early diagnosis has critical importance. Cancer results from accumulated genetic or epigenetic alteration(s) in a variety of genes that directly or indirectly control cell division, cell differentiation, and cell death[37]. The development of gastric cancer in humans has been shown to be a multi-step process, ranging from chronic gastritis to atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and finally invasive cancer[25].

Exposure of cells to a variety of genotoxic and cytotoxic agents has the potential to elicit prolonged and dynamic changes that compromise the stability of the cellular genome[38]. Many of these changes, whether induced directly or indirectly by DNA damage, lead to increases in gene mutation and amplification, reduced cloning efficiency, elevated micronuclei, sister chromatid exchanges, and multiple karyotypic abnormalities[38].

Cytogenetic tests have been widely used in medicine for the assessment of a causal association between disease and cytogenetic damage. In the present study, we investigated whether cytogenetic abnormalities participate in the pathogenesis of GC. SCE, as an indicator of DNA damage, might reflect an instability of DNA or a deficiency of DNA repair. Therefore, it could be used to investigate any causal association between various diseases and any cytogenetic damage[3941].

SCE is known to be increased by exposure to various genotoxic carcinogens[42] and seems to reflect the repair of DNA lesions by homologous recombination[43]. Important sources of exposure include diet, general environment, medical exposure to ionizing radiation, and internal generation of genotoxic species. Internal phenomena, such as metabolism, errors of DNA replication, inflammation and oxidative stress, may be of importance. Inflammatory diseases, oxidative stress and radiation exposure have been associated with the generation of clastogenic factors, which may be quite persistent[4446] and might play an important role in carcinogenesis.

Numerous studies have clarified the relationship between H pylori infection and gastric cancer[1416]. Epidemiological studies have shown that H pylori infection is an important risk factor in gastric cancer[2247]. Several H pylori virulence-associated genes have been found in Western populations to be associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer and precancerous lesions[48]. Studies from Japan have confirmed IL-1β polymorphisms do contribute to the gastric acid secretory response to H pylori infection, and subsequently to clinical sequelae[4950]. A polymorphism in the IL-1β gene cluster, which has both pro-inflammatory and potent acid suppressive effects, is associated with an augmented cytokine response to H pylori infection that increases the risk of gastric atrophy, gastric ulcer, and gastric cancer[351].

Tsai et al[52] reported alterations in gene expression associated with cell damage, inflammation, proliferation, apoptosis, and intestinal differentiation in gastric tissues, taking into account H pylori status. More changes in gene expression, possibly associated with persistent H pylori infection and progression of preneoplasia, were observed in the placebo group. No gene was upregulated over time in tissues from the treatment group. This observation is consistent with current knowledge that H pylori infection induces cell hyperproliferation, inflammation, and genomic instability[53].

The frequency of SCE is increased in patients with carcinoma of cervix uteri, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, prostate carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, acute leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and breast cancer[5459]. Concerning gastric cancer, in one of the earliest studies SCE was increased to similar levels in patients with GC and those with CAG. However, the mean frequencies of both groups were significantly higher than that of the control group[60]. Furthermore, Gulten et al[61] reported increased SCE frequencies in a group of gastritis patients infected with H pylori.

In our study, we found significantly elevated SCE frequencies in both H pylori-negative GC patients and H pylori-negative CAG patients compared with controls. However, there was no difference in SCE frequency between H pylori-negative GC patients and H pylori-negative CAG patients. This result is consistent with the study of Zhou L et al[60]. On the other hand, H pylori-positive CAG patients had a higher SCE frequency than H pylori-negative CAG patients. This finding is consistent with the study of Gulten et al[61]. Similarly, H pylori-positive GC patients had a higher SCE frequency than H pylori-negative GC patients. Furthermore, the SCE frequencies in H pylori-positive GC patients were higher than those in H pylori-positive CAG patients. These findings clearly indicate the significance of simultaneous application of SCE for the screening of high-risk individuals. In addition, the results suggest the genotoxic effect of H pylori infection is a risk factor for gastric cancer. Intense H pylori infection may contribute more to DNA damage and promote carcinogenesis in patients with gastric cancer. Furthermore, chronic H pylori infection is also associated with increased gastric cell turnover, which is probably of importance in malignant transformation[6263].

Our study, which showed increased SCE frequencies in the lymphocytes of CAG patients, could support these observations, as the induction of changes in DNA that lead to mutations play a role in carcinogenicity. Establishment of inherited susceptibility factors is important to recognize individuals at a higher risk of developing gastric cancer, so that they may benefit from early detection and prevention programs.

Recent studies have demonstrated a significantly increased risk for the development of gastric carcinoma in patients with CAG[346465]. Patients with CAG have a markedly increased risk of GC, but the mechanism underlying this increased risk is not well understood. Chronic inflammation has been associated with the development of chromosomal aberrations in both disorders that progress to neoplasia, such as ulcerative colitis[66], and Barrett’s esophagus[67]. Our results confirm and extend these findings to patients with CAG. Many investigators have demonstrated genomic instability and abnormalities in patients with CAG and GC[60616465]. Our analysis suggests that chromosomal instability (DNA) is present at very early stages of neoplastic progression in CAG and GC patients. This instability may be permissive for the generation of other genomic aberrations associated with gastric cancer progression.

In conclusion, our results suggest increased chromosomal instability may be associated with the pathogenesis of early gastric cancer. In addition, our findings indicate that the genotoxic potential of H pylori infection is a risk factor for gastric cancer. Thus, SCE is a promising biomarker for assessing the risk of neoplastic progression in gastric carcinoma.

COMMENTS
Background

It is known there is an increased sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequency in neoplastic diseases. Gastric cancer is still a common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, despite improved diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Hence, early diagnosis has critical importance.

Research frontiers

Analysis of SCE is a cytogenetic technique used to show DNA damage as a result of an exchange of DNA fragments between sister chromatids. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine, by assessing SCE frequencies, whether genetic impairment and DNA damage have an effect on the pathogenesis of GC.

Innovations and breakthroughs

Our results suggest increased chromosomal instability may be associated with the pathogenesis of early gastric cancer. The identification of increased SCE frequency in patients with gastric lesions may be helpful in the early diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Applications

SCE analysis has come into use as a sensitive means of monitoring the DNA damage. SCE analysis may be used as a marker to estimate the risk of gastric cancer.

Terminology

Sister chromatid exchange (SCE): SCE is known to result from reciprocal DNA interchange in homologous loci of sister chromatids during the replication process.

Peer review

This study indicated genetic impairment and genetic instability may play an important role in gastric cancer. In addition, these findings show the genotoxic potential of H pylori infection is a risk factor for gastric cancer.

Footnotes

Peer reviewer: Serdar Karakose, Dr, Professor, Department of Radiology, Meram Medical Faculty, Selcuk University, Konya 42080, Turkey

References
1.  Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74-108.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Damjonov I, Linder J. Stomach and Duodenum. Anderson’s pathology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby 1996; 1672-1673.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Testino G. Gastric preneoplastic changes. Recenti Prog Med. 2004;95:239-244.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Pasechnikov VD, Chukov SZ, Kotelevets SM, Mostovov AN, Mernova VP, Polyakova MB. Possibility of non-invasive diagnosis of gastric mucosal precancerous changes. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:3146-3150.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Rosai J Ackerman's surgical pathology. 7th ed. Washington: Mosby 1989; 467-470.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Matozaki T, Sakamoto C, Suzuki T, Matsuda K, Uchida T, Nakano O, Wada K, Nishisaki H, Konda Y, Nagao M. p53 gene mutations in human gastric cancer: wild-type p53 but not mutant p53 suppresses growth of human gastric cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1992;52:4335-4341.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Sakaguchi T, Watanabe A, Sawada H, Yamada Y, Yamashita J, Matsuda M, Nakajima M, Miwa T, Hirao T, Nakano H. Prognostic value of cyclin E and p53 expression in gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1998;82:1238-1243.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Yasui W, Yokozaki H, Fujimoto J, Naka K, Kuniyasu H, Tahara E. Genetic and epigenetic alterations in multistep carcinogenesis of the stomach. J Gastroenterol. 2000;35 Suppl 12:111-115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Lim BH, Soong R, Grieu F, Robbins PD, House AK, Iacopetta BJ. p53 accumulation and mutation are prognostic indicators of poor survival in human gastric carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1996;69:200-204.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Cho JH, Noguchi M, Ochiai A, Hirohashi S. Loss of heterozygosity of multiple tumor suppressor genes in human gastric cancers by polymerase chain reaction. Lab Invest. 1996;74:835-841.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Sano T, Tsujino T, Yoshida K, Nakayama H, Haruma K, Ito H, Nakamura Y, Kajiyama G, Tahara E. Frequent loss of heterozygosity on chromosomes 1q, 5q, and 17p in human gastric carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1991;51:2926-2931.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Hansson LE, Nyron O, Hsing AW, Bergstrom R, Josefsson S, Chow WH, Fraumeni JF Jr, Adami HO. The risk of stomach cancer in patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer disease. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:242-249.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Forman D. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1996;220:23-26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, Matsumura N, Yamaguchi S, Yamakido M, Taniyama K, Sasaki N, Schlemper RJ. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:784-789.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Zhou LY, Lin SR, Shen ZR, Zhong SZ, Ding SG, Huang XB, Wang LX, Xia ZW Wei Z, Jin Z, Cao SZ. Five-year follow-up study on the morbidity of peptic ulcer and Helicobacter pylori reinfection after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Chin J Dig. 2002;22:76-79.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Kuipers EJ, Uyterlinde AM, Pena AS, Roosendaal R, Pals G, Nelis GF, Festen HP, Meuwissen SG. Long-term sequelae of Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Lancet. 1995;345:1525-1528.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Forman D, Newell DG, Fullerton F, Yarnell JW, Stacey AR, Wald N, Sitas F. Association between infection with Helicobacter pylori and risk of gastric cancer: evidence from a prospective investigation. BMJ. 1991;302:1302-1305.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Nomura A, Stemmermann GN, Chyou PH, Kato I, Perez-Perez GI, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric carcinoma among Japanese Americans in Hawaii. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1132-1136.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Parsonnet J, Friedman GD, Vandersteen DP, Chang Y, Vogelman JH, Orentreich N, Sibley RK. Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of gastric carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1127-1131.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Honda S, Fujioka T, Tokieda M, Satoh R, Nishizono A, Nasu M. Development of Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric carcinoma in Mongolian gerbils. Cancer Res. 1998;58:4255-4259.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  International Agency for Research on Cancer: Schistosomes. liver flukes and Helicobacter Pylori, Monograph 61. Lyon: IARC. 1994;177-240.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Asaka M, Takeda H, Sugiyama T, Kato M. What role does Helicobacter pylori play in gastric cancer? Gastroenterology. 1997;113:S56-S60.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Konat GW. H2O2-induced higher order chromatin degradation: a novel mechanism of oxidative genotoxicity. J Biosci. 2003;28:57-60.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Imyanitov EN, Togo AV, Hanson KP. Searching for cancer-associated gene polymorphisms: promises and obstacles. Cancer Lett. 2004;204:3-14.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Wolff S. Biological dosimetry with cytogenetic endpoints. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1991;372:351-362.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Kelsey KT. Cytogenetic techniques for biological monitoring. Occup Med. 1990;5:39-47.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Therman E, Susman M.  Human chromosomes: Structure, behavior and effects. 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag 1993; 126-134.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Honma M, Tadokoro S, Sakamoto H, Tanabe H, Sugimoto M, Furuichi Y, Satoh T, Sofuni T, Goto M, Hayashi M. Chromosomal instability in B-lymphoblasotoid cell lines from Werner and Bloom syndrome patients. Mutat Res. 2002;520:15-24.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Ozturk S, Palanduz S, Cefle K, Tutkan G, Ucur A, Dincol G, Nalcaci M, Aktan M, Yavuz S, Kucukkaya RD. Genotoxicity and sister chromatid exchange in patients with myelodysplastic disorders. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2005;159:148-150.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Lee KH, Abe S, Yanabe Y, Matsuda I, Yoshida MC. Superoxide dismutase activity and chromosome damage in cultured chromosome instability syndrome cells. Mutat Res. 1990;244:251-256.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Shigenaga MK, Hagen TM, Ames BN. Oxidative damage and mitochondrial decay in aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:10771-10778.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  Loft S, Poulsen HE. Cancer risk and oxidative DNA damage in man. J Mol Med. 1996;74:297-312.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Turner DR, Dreimanis M, Holt D, Firgaira FA, Morley AA. Mitotic recombination is an important mutational event following oxidative damage. Mutat Res. 2003;522:21-26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Tominaga H, Kodama S, Matsuda N, Suzuki K, Watanabe M. Involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the induction of genetic instability by radiation. J Radiat Res (Tokyo). 2004;45:181-188.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Limoli CL, Giedzinski E, Morgan WF, Swarts SG, Jones GD, Hyun W. Persistent oxidative stress in chromosomally unstable cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3107-3111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Latt SA, Schreck RR. Sister chromatid exchange analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1980;32:297-313.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Sandberg AA. Chromosome abnormalities in human cancer and leukemia. Mutat Res. 1991;247:231-240.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Morgan WF, Day JP, Kaplan MI, McGhee EM, Limoli CL. Genomic instability induced by ionizing radiation. Radiat Res. 1996;146:247-258.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Murthy MK, Bhargava MK, Augustus M. Sister chromatid exchange studies in oral cancer patients. Indian J Cancer. 1997;34:49-58.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Kang MH, Genser D, Elmadfa I. Increased sister chromatid exchanges in peripheral lymphocytes of patients with Crohn's disease. Mutat Res. 1997;381:141-148.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Cottliar AS, Fundia AF, Moran C, Sosa E, Geldern P, Gomez JC, Chopita N, Slavutsky IR. Evidence of chromosome instability in chronic pancreatitis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2000;19:513-517.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Albertini RJ, Anderson D, Douglas GR, Hagmar L, Hemminki K, Merlo F, Natarajan AT, Norppa H, Shuker DE, Tice R. IPCS guidelines for the monitoring of genotoxic effects of carcinogens in humans. International Programme on Chemical Safety. Mutat Res. 2000;463:111-172.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
43.  Helleday T. Pathways for mitotic homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mutat Res. 2003;532:103-115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
44.  Liu TZ, Stern A, Emerit I. Clastogenic factors: biomarkers of oxidative stress of potential utility in the clinical chemistry laboratory. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1999;29:134-139.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
45.  Morgan WF. Is there a common mechanism underlying genomic instability, bystander effects and other nontargeted effects of exposure to ionizing radiation? Oncogene. 2003;22:7094-7099.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
46.  Sowa Resat MB, Morgan WF. Radiation-induced genomic instability: a role for secreted soluble factors in communicating the radiation response to non-irradiated cells. J Cell Biochem. 2004;92:1013-1019.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Hoshi T, Sasano H, Kato K, Ohara S, Shimosegawa T, Toyota T, Nagura H. Cell damage and proliferation in human gastric mucosa infected by Helicobacter pylori--a comparison before and after H pylori eradication in non-atrophic gastritis. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:1412-1417.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  Moss SF, Sood S. Helicobacter pylori. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2003;16:445-451.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
49.  Furuta T, Shirai N, Takashima M, Xiao F, Sugimura H. Effect of genotypic differences in interleukin-1 beta on gastric acid secretion in Japanese patients infected with Helicobacter pylori. Am J Med. 2002;112:141-143.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
50.  Furuta T, El-Omar EM, Xiao F, Shirai N, Takashima M, Sugimura H. Interleukin 1beta polymorphisms increase risk of hypochlorhydria and atrophic gastritis and reduce risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence in Japan. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:92-105.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
51.  Figueiredo C, Machado JC, Pharoah P, Seruca R, Sousa S, Carvalho R, Capelinha AF, Quint W, Caldas C, van Doorn LJ. Helicobacter pylori and interleukin 1 genotyping: an opportunity to identify high-risk individuals for gastric carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1680-1687.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
52.  Tsai CJ, Herrera-Goepfert R, Tibshirani RJ, Yang S, Mohar A, Guarner J, Parsonnet J. Changes of gene expression in gastric preneoplasia following Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:272-280.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
53.  Nardone G, Staibano S, Rocco A, Mezza E, D'armiento FP, Insabato L, Coppola A, Salvatore G, Lucariello A, Figura N. Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection and its eradication on cell proliferation, DNA status, and oncogene expression in patients with chronic gastritis. Gut. 1999;44:789-799.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
54.  Wang LY, Lai MS, Huang SJ, Hsieh CY, Hsu MM, Chen CJ. Increased sister chromatid exchange frequency in peripheral lymphocytes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and cervical cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 1994;14:105-107.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
55.  Dhillon VS, Dhillon IK. Chromosome aberrations and sister chromatid exchange studies in patients with prostate cancer: possible evidence of chromosome instability. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1998;100:143-147.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
56.  Dhar PK, Devi S, Rao TR, Kumari U, Joseph A, Kumar MR, Nayak S, Shreemati Y, Bhat SM, Bhat KR. Significance of lymphocytic sister chromatid exchange frequencies in ovarian cancer patients. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1996;89:105-108.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
57.  Tuna M, Artan S, Gezer S, Sayli BS, Basaran N. Sister chromatid exchange analysis in acute leukemia patients. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1995;79:86-88.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
58.  Ozturk S, Palanduz S, Aktan M, Cefle K, Serakinci N, Perkcelen Y. Sister chromatid exchange frequency in B-cells stimulated by TPA in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2000;123:49-51.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
59.  Roy SK, Trivedi AH, Bakshi SR, Patel RK, Shukla PH, Patel SJ, Bhatavdekar JM, Patel DD, Shah PM. Spontaneous chromosomal instability in breast cancer families. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2000;118:52-56.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
60.  Zhou L. Sister chromatid exchange in gastric cancer, chronic atrophic gastritis and normal control. Zhonghua Zhongliu Zazhi. 1985;7:257-259.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
61.  Gulten T, Tokyay N, Demiray M, Gulten M, Ercan I, Evke E, Sardas S, Karakaya AE. The role of triple therapy, age, gender and smoking on the genotoxic effects of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Int Med Res. 2002;30:380-385.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
62.  Kim JJ, Tao H, Carloni E, Leung WK, Graham DY, Sepulveda AR. Helicobacter pylori impairs DNA mismatch repair in gastric epithelial cells. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:542-553.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
63.  Yu J, Leung WK, Go MY, Chan MC, To KF, Ng EK, Chan FK, Ling TK, Chung SC, Sung JJ. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori babA2 status with gastric epithelial cell turnover and premalignant gastric lesions. Gut. 2002;51:480-484.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
64.  Yasa MH, Bektas A, Yukselen V, Akbulut H, Camci C, Ormeci N. DNA analysis and DNA ploidy in gastric cancer and gastric precancerous lesions. Int J Clin Pract. 2005;59:1029-1033.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
65.  Roa JC, Araya JC, Villaseca MA, Roa I, Correa P. Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity in neoplastic and preneoplastic gastric lesions. Rev Med Chil. 2003;131:1227-1236.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
66.  Rabinovitch PS, Dziadon S, Brentnall TA, Emond MJ, Crispin DA, Haggitt RC, Bronner MP. Pancolonic chromosomal instability precedes dysplasia and cancer in ulcerative colitis. Cancer Res. 1999;59:5148-5153.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
67.  Barrett MT, Sanchez CA, Prevo LJ, Wong DJ, Galipeau PC, Paulson TG, Rabinovitch PS, Reid BJ. Evolution of neoplastic cell lineages in Barrett oesophagus. Nat Genet. 1999;22:106-109.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]