Rapid Communication Open Access
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2006; 12(27): 4406-4410
Published online Jul 21, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i27.4406
Isolated antibody to hepatitis B core antigen in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection
Ahmed Helmy, Department of Liver Transplantation, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and also affiliated to Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt
Mohammed Ibrahim Al-Sebayel, Department of Liver Transplantation, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Supported by a Grant from King Abdel-Aziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Correspondence to: Dr. Ahmed Helmy, Department of Liver Transplantation, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, MBC: 72, PO Box: 3354, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia. ahsalem10@hotmail.com
Telephone: +966-1-4424818 Fax: +966-1-4424817
Received: November 1, 2005
Revised: November 28, 2005
Accepted: December 23, 2005
Published online: July 21, 2006

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of isolated anti-HBc in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and its relation to disease severity.

METHODS: We screened all patients with chronic HCV infection referred to King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), and anti-HBc. One hundred and sixty nine patients who tested negative for both HBsAg and anti-HBs were included in this study.

RESULTS: Pathologically, 59 had biopsy-proven cirrhosis and 110 had chronic active hepatitis (CAH). Of these 169 patients, 85 (50.3%) tested positive for anti-HBc. Patients with CAH had significantly higher prevalence of isolated anti-HBc than patients with cirrhosis, 71 (64.5%) and 14 (23.7%) respectively (P < 0.001). Twenty-five patients were tested for HBV DNA by qualitative PCR. The test was positive in 3 of them (12%; occult HBV infection).

CONCLUSION: Isolated anti-HBc alone is common in Saudi patients with chronic HCV infection, and is significantly more common in those with CAH than those with cirrhosis. Therefore, a screening strategy that only tests for HBsAg and anti-HBs in these patients will miss a large number of individuals with isolated anti-HBc, who may be potentially infectious.

Key Words: Cirrhosis; Chronic hepatitis; Dual infection; Co-infection; Hepatitis B screening; Super-infection



INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections account for a substantial proportion of acute and chronic liver diseases world-wide[1-4], including Saudi Arabia[5-7]. Both viruses share similar risk factors and modes of transmission and as a consequence, combined HBV and HCV infection is frequent especially in areas endemic for HBV, and among people at high risk of parenteral infection[1-5]. Indeed, patients with HCV-related chronic liver disease (CLD) frequently show markers of previous HBV infection. Moreover, they may carry occult HBV infection. These features might influence clinical and biochemical features as well as stage of disease.

Screening patients with chronic HCV for the coexistence of HBV infection is usually based on serum testing for the presence hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). This screening is critical, because HBV infection needs treatment if present, can be prevented by vaccination if absent, and may adversely affect liver pathology and the response to therapy.

Isolated hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) represents either resolved HBV infection with loss of hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs); occult chronic HBV infection with levels of the HBsAg below the limits of detection; or a false-positive test result. Many western publications have reported that 2%-5% of healthy blood donors have isolated anti-HBc[8-10]. Similarly, isolated anti-HBc was reported in 125 (2%) of 6035 consecutive Saudi blood donors[11]. In addition, we have previously shown that the prevalence of isolated anti-HBc in HBsAg negative potential liver donors is 32%, and is significantly higher in non-Saudi nationals (41.3%) compared with Saudi citizens (16.7%)[12]. However, the prevalence of isolated anti-HBc in patients with chronic HCV infection has not been studied. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to evaluate the prevalence of “isolated anti-HBc” in patients with chronic HCV infection, and to assess its relation to disease severity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The subjects included in this study are referrals to King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSH&RC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between January and December 2004.

Subjects included in this study (n = 169) are patients with confirmed chronic HCV infection genotype 4, and negative HBsAg and anti-HBs. HCV antibody testing was performed with an enzyme immunoassay (Abbott HCV EIA 2.0; Abbott Laboratories) and positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for HCV RNA for more than 6 mo. Routine liver function tests and diagnostic liver biopsy were done to all patients. Histological diagnosis was evaluated, using the modified Knodell’s histological activity index,[13] by a pathologist who was unaware of the patient’s serological data.

Tests for HBsAg, anti-HBs, and anti-HBc were done using (Auszyme; Abbott Laboratories), (Ausab EIA; Abbott Laboratories) and (Hepatitis B Virus Core Antigen Corzyme; Abbott Laboratories) respectively. In addition, sera from a subgroup of patients (n = 25) who tested positive (n = 19) and negative (n = 6) for anti-HBc only were further tested for the presence of HBV DNA using nested-PCR with primers deduced from the core region. In the cases tested positive (n = 3), viral load was performed using HBV-Amplicor Monitor (Roche Molecular System). The lower limit of detection for this assay is 2000 copies/mL. As this study concentrates on isolated anti-HBc in patients with chronic HCV infection, subjects with overt HBV infection alone or in combination with HCV were excluded.

This study was approved by the Institutional Research Committee and the Review Board of the KFSH&RC.

Statistical analysis

Results were collected in a Microsoft Exel spread sheet, and expressed as mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. Data were examined by the Pearson’s correlation coefficient and two-tailed paired, un-paired Student’s t-tests, Chi-Square, as appropriate Using SPSS Statistical Package version 10 (SPSS Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was taken at the 5% level.

RESULTS

A summary of the demographic patient’ characteristics is shown in Table 1. A total of 169 patients with chronic HCV infection were included. Based on liver function testing, positive serum anti-HCV, positive HCV RNA, and liver histopathology, 59 patients had biopsy-proven cirrhosis and 110 had CAH. Of these 169 patients, 85 (50.3%) tested positive for anti-HBc. The potential mode of transmission was identified in 123 patients (72.8%), and includes blood transfusion, surgical and dental interventions before the availability of HCV testing. The remaining cases may fall under intra-familial spead. We did not test the partners for HCV or HBV infection in this study. Therefore, the sexual transmission can not be excluded.

Table 1 Subjects characteristics (n = 169).
VariableMeanSD
Age (yr)44.018.0
Sex
Female57 (33.7%)
Male112 (66.3%)
INR1.10.26
AST (U/L)81.197.3
ALT (U/L)74.488.3
GGT (U/L)117.8194.9
Bilirubin (μmol/L)29.953.1
ALP (U/L)149.9111.3
Albumin (g/L)35.76.2
Urea (mmol/L))6.96.4
Creatinine (μmol/L)144.5196.6
Liver histopathology
Cirrhosis59 (34.9%)
CAH110 (65.1%)
Anti-HBc
+ve85 (50.3%)
 - ve84 (49.7%)
Comparison between patients with positive anti-HBc and negative anti-HBc

Compared with patients with negative anti-HBc, patients with chronic HCV infection and positive isolated anti-HBc antibody had significantly higher mean age, and significantly lower mean ALT levels (P < 0.001 and P < 0.5 respectively; Table 2). The mean AST levels were also less in patients with negative HBc antibody, though it did not reach statistical significance. In addition, and despite their higher mean age, patients with isolated anti-HBc antibody pathologically showed a significantly less cirrhotic and significantly more chronic hepatitis picture (P < 0.001, Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison between patients with positive anti-HBc and those with negative anti-HBc.
VariablePatients with HCV & positive anti-HBc (n = 85)Patients with HCV & negative anti-HBc (n = 84)P value
Age (yr)39.1 ± 18.348.9 ± 16.3< 0.001
Sex Female Male33 (38.8) 52 (61.2)24 (28.6) 60 (71.4)NS
INR1.1 ± 0.31.1 ± 0.2NS
AST (U/L)68.1 ± 44.594.4 ± 130.1NS
ALT (U/L)61.0 ± 39.988.8 ± 119.0< 0.05
GGT (U/L)100.2 ± 134.0137.2 ± 245.8NS
Bilirubin (μmol/L)30.0 ± 50.129.7 ± 56.6NS
ALP (U/L)133.2 ± 89.5168.0 ± 129.1NS
Albumin (g/L)35.9 ± 6.135.4 ± 6.3NS
Urea (mmol/L)6.2 ± 4.37.8 ± 8.0NS
Creatinine (μmol/L)117.5 ± 138.91792.9 ± 240.6NS
Liver pathology Cirrhosis14 (16.5)45 (83.5)< 0.001
CAH71 (53.6)39 (46.4)
HBV DNA Polymerase Chain Reaction

Qualitative PCR testing for HBV DNA was performed in 25 cases (14.8%); 6 were negative for anti-HBc, and 19 were positive for isolated anti-HBc antibody. Positive serum HBV DNA was detected in 3 patients, all had positive isolated anti-HBc (15.8% of the 19 cases with positive anti-HBc, and 12% of the 25 cases tested by PCR), two were cirrhotic and the third was in the chronic inflammatory stage. The viral load in these 3 patients was 4820, 3800, and 4300 copies/mL respectively. Therefore, they represent an “occult HBV Infection”, and are potentially infectious.

Independent predictors of cirrhosis

Multivariate regression analysis of variables of interest (age, sex, ALP, AST, ALT, urea, creatinine, International Normalization Ratio, bilirubin, albumin, +ve anti-HBc) revealed the presence of raised INR (P = 0.002), increased ALP (P = 0.006), and -ve serum anti-HBc antibody (P = 0.0001) to independently predict liver cirrhosis in the studied cohort (Table 3).

Table 3 Multivariate regression analysis for the predictors of liver cirrhosis.
VariableBP valueExp (B)95% CI for Exp (B)
LowerUpper
Age-0.01NS1.00.951.02
Sex0.64NS1.90.556.45
INR7.690.002218218.01264549
AST-0.01NS1.000.991.00
Bilirubin0.00NS1.000.981.01
ALP-0.010.0061.000.991.00
Albumin-0.02NS0.980.981.11
Urea0.05NS1.100.871.27
Creatinine0.00NS1.001.001.00
+anti-HBc-2.630.00010.070.020.28
Constant-3.36NS
DISCUSSION

The findings of this study suggest that > 50% of patients with chronic HCV infection for whom there is no serological evidence for HBV, when screened with HBsAg and anti-HBs, will be positive for anti-HBc antibody especially those in the chronic inflammatory stage of the disease.

HCV-infected patients should be tested for HBV markers to determine those who should receive HBV vaccination and those who need anti-HBV treatment. For patients with chronic HCV infection, prevention of HBV infection is critical, because this viral infection can be particularly severe and may adversely affect disease outcome.

Isolated Anti-HBc was previously reported to exist in 2% of 6035 Saudi blood donors[11]. A figure that is similar to what has been reported else where[8-10]. The high prevalence of isolated anti-HBc antibody in patients with chronic HCV infection detected in this study (50.3%) has previously been reported in a similar study in patients with HCV with or without HIV-1 coinfection[14]. This reflects the similar mode of transmission, high endemicity of both infections. Indeed, the detection of HBV DNA by PCR in these patients rules out the possibility of false positive results and confirms the diagnosis of occult coinfection.

Occult HBV infection may be manifested by having negative test results for HBsAg, but positive results for HBV DNA. The frequency of occult HBV infection in patients with anti-HBc is controversial. In one study, occult HBV infection was reported in 33% of subjects with chronic liver disease due to HCV infection and was more frequent in subjects with isolated anti-HBc[15]. Diagnosing occult HBV infection requires sensitive HBV-DNA PCR assay. The postulated mechanisms underlying occult HBV infection include mutations of HBV-DNA sequence, formation of immune complexes-containing HBV, an integration of HBV-DNA into host’s chromosomes, HBV infection of leucocytes, altered host immune responses, and interference by other viruses. The clinical implications of occult HBV infection involve different clinical aspects including first; harboring potential risk of HBV transmission through blood transfusion, hemodialysis, and organ transplantation; second, causing cryptogenic liver disease; third, contributing to the development of acute exacerbation or even hepatocellular carcinoma; and fourth, affecting disease progression and response to treatment of patients with chronic HCV infection[16].

The precise prevalence of occult HBV infection is variable. In the present study, we found occult HBV infection in 15.8% in patients with chronic HCV infection with positive anti-HBc antibody. Higher figures were detected in other studies. For example, using PCR with primer pairs from three different regions of the HBV genome, Jilg et al demonstrated that 32.9% of patients with anti-HBc alone are positive for HBV DNA, the majority of them showing very low HBV concentrations[17]. Also, Feraro et al 2003 found occult HBV infection in 7 out of 22 patients with HCV. However, this was unrelated to anti-HBc status[18]. Similarly, occult HBV infection was detected in 42% of HIV-infected patients, and was significantly common in subjects with concomitant HCV infection (80%) than those with HIV-1 infection alone[14]. This supports the suggested policy of donor exclusion based on the anti-HBc and anti-HBs serology as a means to eliminate low grade carriers of HBV in endemic areas without jeopardizing the blood supply. This variation in the prevalence of occult HBV may be related to differences in prevalence of each viral infection in different communities, differences in the PCR technique, or population selection bias. Highly sensitive, quantitative, and functional molecular analyses of HBV, combined with a well-designed prospective clinical assessment will provide the best approach for the future study of occult HBV infection.

The higher prevalence of anti-HBc antibody in patients with chronic HCV hepatitis than in patients with cirrhosis observed in this study may be explained by a possible inhibitory effect exerted by HBV on HCV replication[19]. In agreement with this, a study by Kao et al showed that occult HBV infection does not have clinical significance in patients with chronic hepatitis C residing in areas where HBV infection is endemic[15]. Furthermore, occult HBV infection had no effect on early response to PEG-INF alpha[20]. Further follow up into the maintenance and post-treatment phases will clarify if and when occult HBV affects the sustained viral response. However, Giannini et al have reported a different observation[21]. In their study, the positivity for markers of HBV infection was more frequent in the cirrhotic group as compared to patients with CAH. They also reported higher histological grading and scoring in patients with CAH with anti-HBc[21]. Reasons of this disagreement are not clear, but a difference in the HCV genotype and duration of infection may be implicated, as most of our patients are genotype 4, while those included in Giannini study were Genotype 1b[21]. Other factors that may aggravate the histological scoring and grading in the study of Giannini et al such as alcohol intake, may have contributed to this difference.

Finally, subjects with isolated anti-HBc who test negative for HBV DNA may have cleared HBV infection and lost undetectable anti-HBs or have a false-positive test result for anti-HBc due to cross-reacting antibodies present in individuals with HCV infection. For patients with isolated anti-HBc who have cleared HBV infection and have undetectable levels of anti-HBs, immunization with HBV vaccine may result in an anamnestic response, which is the presence of detectable anti-HBs within a few weeks after the first vaccination[22,23].

The possible limitations of the present study include; First, KFSH&RC is a tertiary center, which raises a question regarding the generalizability of the findings. However, studies conducted in Europe show similar results[10,24,25], which suggest that our conclusions are not specific to a particular geographic region. Second, we tested subjects for total anti-HBc level, rather than IgG and IgM isotypes. Therefore, acute HBV infection, in which only IgM antibody is present, can not be differentiated from the chronic one. Finally, not all subjects who tested negative for HBsAg and anti-HBs and positive anti-HBc underwent testing for HBV DNA. However, the subgroup tested for HBV DNA revealed positive cases (3 in 19, 15.8%), confirming the conclusions of this study. Missing isolated anti-HBc positivity, which represents occult HBV infection in > 10% of cases may have serious implication if these cases were used in organ donation, blood transfusion. They may also be misdiagnosed as cryptogenic liver disease, in patients who test negative for anti-HBsAg and HCV antibody.

In conclusion, isolated anti-HBV sero-pattern is a common finding in patients with chronic HCV infection, and may represent an occult infection in a smaller percent. A screening strategy that tests only for HBsAg and anti-HBs in HCV-infected patients will miss a large number of individuals with isolated anti-HBc, and a smaller number of patients with occult HBV infection. Addition of anti-HBc antibody screening is recommended, to avoid the adverse implications of missed HBV occult co-infection

Footnotes

S- Editor Wang J L- Editor Misra SP E- Editor Liu WF

References
1.  Lee DS, Huh K, Lee EH, Lee DH, Hong KS, Sung YC. HCV and HBV coexist in HBsAg-negative patients with HCV viraemia: possibility of coinfection in these patients must be considered in HBV-high endemic area. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997;12:855-861.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Zarski JP, Bohn B, Bastie A, Pawlotsky JM, Baud M, Bost-Bezeaux F, Tran van Nhieu J, Seigneurin JM, Buffet C, Dhumeaux D. Characteristics of patients with dual infection by hepatitis B and C viruses. J Hepatol. 1998;28:27-33.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 250]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 260]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Pontisso P, Gerotto M, Benvegnù L, Chemello L, Alberti A. Coinfection by hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus. Antivir Ther. 1998;3:137-142.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Mehdi SR, Pophali A, Al-Abdul Rahim KA. Prevalence of hepatitis B and C and blood donors. Saudi Med J. 2000;21:942-944.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Memish Z, Qasim L, Abed E, AlBasheer A, Aldraihim A, Knawy B, Hajeer AH. Pattern of viral hepatitis infection in a selected population from Saudi Arabia. Mil Med. 2003;168:565-568.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Mohamed Ael S, al Karawi MA, Mesa GA. Dual infection with hepatitis C and B viruses: clinical and histological study in Saudi patients. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:1404-1406.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Ghabrah TM, Stickland GT, Tsarev S, Yarbough P, Farci P, Engle R, Emerson S, Purcell R. Acute viral hepatitis in Saudi Arabia: seroepidemiological analysis, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and evidence for a sixth hepatitis agent. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21:621-627.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Hadler SC, Murphy BL, Schable CA, Heyward WL, Francis DP, Kane MA. Epidemiological analysis of the significance of low-positive test results for antibody to hepatitis B surface and core antigens. J Clin Microbiol. 1984;19:521-525.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Joller-Jemelka HI, Wicki AN, Grob PJ. Detection of HBs antigen in "anti-HBc alone" positive sera. J Hepatol. 1994;21:269-272.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 51]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Grob P, Jilg W, Bornhak H, Gerken G, Gerlich W, Günther S, Hess G, Hüdig H, Kitchen A, Margolis H. Serological pattern "anti-HBc alone": report on a workshop. J Med Virol. 2000;62:450-455.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Bernvil SS, Andrews V, Kuhns MC, McNamara AL. Hepatitis B core antigen antibody as an indicator of a low grade carrier state for hepatitis B virus in a Saudi Arabian blood donor population. Transfus Sci. 1997;18:49-53.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Al-Sebayel MI, Khalaf HA, Ramirez CG. The prevalence of hepatitis B core antibody positivity in donors for liver transplantation in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2002;23:298-300.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, Callea F, De Groote J, Gudat F, Denk H, Desmet V, Korb G, MacSween RN. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol. 1995;22:696-699.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3521]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3679]  [Article Influence: 126.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
14.  Gandhi RT, Wurcel A, Lee H, McGovern B, Boczanowski M, Gerwin R, Corcoran CP, Szczepiorkowski Z, Toner S, Cohen DE. Isolated antibody to hepatitis B core antigen in human immunodeficiency virus type-1-infected individuals. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:1602-1605.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Kao JH, Chen PJ, Lai MY, Chen DS. Occult hepatitis B virus infection and clinical outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:4068-4071.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 106]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 123]  [Article Influence: 5.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Cacciola I, Pollicino T, Squadrito G, Cerenzia G, Orlando ME, Raimondo G. Occult hepatitis B virus infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C liver disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:22-26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 474]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 491]  [Article Influence: 19.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Jilg W, Sieger E, Zachoval R, Schätzl H. Individuals with antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen as the only serological marker for hepatitis B infection: high percentage of carriers of hepatitis B and C virus. J Hepatol. 1995;23:14-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 127]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 129]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Ferraro D, Bonura C, Giglio M, Di Stefano R, Almasio PL, Di Marco V, Craxì A, Cacciola I, Squadrito G, Raimondo G. Occult HBV infection and suppression of HCV replication in the early phase of combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2003;17:172-175.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Fan CL, Wei L, Jiang D, Chen HS, Gao Y, Li RB, Wang Y. Spontaneous viral clearance after 6-21 years of hepatitis B and C viruses coinfection in high HBV endemic area. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:2012-2016.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Fabris P, Brown D, Tositti G, Bozzola L, Giordani MT, Bevilacqua P, de Lalla F, Webster GJ, Dusheiko G. Occult hepatitis B virus infection does not affect liver histology or response to therapy with interferon alpha and ribavirin in intravenous drug users with chronic hepatitis C. J Clin Virol. 2004;29:160-166.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Giannini E, Ceppa P, Botta F, Fasoli A, Romagnoli P, Ansaldi F, Durando P, Risso D, Lantieri PB, Icardi GC. Previous hepatitis B virus infection is associated with worse disease stage and occult hepatitis B virus infection has low prevalence and pathogenicity in hepatitis C virus-positive patients. Liver Int. 2003;23:12-18.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Lok AS, Lai CL, Wu PC. Prevalence of isolated antibody to hepatitis B core antigen in an area endemic for hepatitis B virus infection: implications in hepatitis B vaccination programs. Hepatology. 1988;8:766-770.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 98]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 89]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  McMahon BJ, Parkinson AJ, Helminiak C, Wainwright RB, Bulkow L, Kellerman-Douglas A, Schoenberg S, Ritter D. Response to hepatitis B vaccine of persons positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. Gastroenterology. 1992;103:590-594.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Piroth L, Binquet C, Vergne M, Minello A, Livry C, Bour JB, Buisson M, Duong M, Grappin M, Portier H. The evolution of hepatitis B virus serological patterns and the clinical relevance of isolated antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen in HIV infected patients. J Hepatol. 2002;36:681-686.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 74]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Berger A, Doerr HW, Rabenau HF, Weber B. High frequency of HCV infection in individuals with isolated antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. Intervirology. 2000;43:71-76.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]