Brief Reports Open Access
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2005; 11(6): 890-894
Published online Feb 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i6.890
Hybrid artificial liver support system for treatment of severe liver failure
Jian-He Gan, Ai-Lan Qin, Er-Ping Luo, Wei-Feng Zhao, Jie Xu, Department of Infectious Diseases, First Hospital affiliated to Suzhou University, Suzhou 215006, Jangsu Province China
Xia-Qiu Zhou, Hong Yu, Department of Infectious Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai 200025, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by Health Office of Jangsu Province Science Research Foundation, No. WK2002 (for important subject) and H200145 (for natural science)
Correspondence to: Dr. Jian-He Gan, Department of Infectious Diseases, First Hospital affiliated to Suzhou University, Suzhou 215006, Jangsu Province, China. ellen2111@sina.com.cn
Telephone: +86-512-65223637-8385
Received: April 9, 2004
Revised: April 11, 2004
Accepted: May 13, 2004
Published online: February 14, 2005

Abstract

AIM: To construct a novel hybrid artificial liver support system (HALSS) and to evaluate its efficacy in patients with severe liver failure.

METHODS: Hepatocytes were isolated from suckling pig by the modified Seglen’s method. Isolated hepatocytes were cultured in a spinner flask for 24 h to form spheroids before use and the functions of spheroids were detected. HALSS consisted of a plasma separator, a hemo-adsorba and a bioreactor with hepatocytes spheroids in its extra-fiber space. HALSS was applied to 10 patients with severe liver failure. The general condition and the biochemical indexes of the patients were studied just before and after the treatment.

RESULTS: The number of cells per liver was about 2-4×1010 (mean, 3.1±1.5×1010). The cell viabilities were more than 95%. After 24 h of spheroid culture, most hepatocytes formed spheroids. The levels of albumin and urea in the medium of spheroid culture were higher than those in supernatant of petri dish culture (P = 0.0015 and 0.0001, respectively). The capacity of albumin production and urea synthesis remained stable for more than one wk and declined rapidly after two weeks in vitro. In HALSS group, the duration of HALSS treatment was 6-10 h each time. All patients tolerated the treatment well without any fatal adverse reaction. After HALSS treatment, the general condition, psychic state, encephalopathy and hepatic function of the patients were improved. The survival rate of the HALSS group, Plasmapheresis group and control group was 30% (3/10), 20% (2/10) and 0% (0/10), respectively (P = 0.024). Two weeks after treatment, Tbil and ALT decreased and the PTA level elevated in HALSS group and pasmapheresis group (P value: 0.015 vs 0.020, 0.009 vs 0.012 and 0.032 vs 0.041, respectively). But there was no significant change of blood albumin concentration before and after treatment in HALSS group and Plasmapheresis group.

CONCLUSION: The HALSS established by us is effective in supporting liver function of patients with severe liver failure.

Key Words: Liver failure; Hybrid artificial liver support system; Hepatocytes



INTRODUCTION

Liver is an important organ with complex functions, including gluconeogenesis, synthesis of blood proteins, amino acid metabolism, urea synthesis, lipid metabolism, drug detoxification, waste removal, and immune and hormonal modulation[1]. Many people suffer from liver diseases, especially severe hepatitis, in China, and most of the cases give rise to widespread hepatic necrosis with little hepatocyte regeneration. Currently, the only available treatment is liver transplantation. However, liver transplantation faces acute shortages of donors worldwide and the patients treated with liver transplantation are subjected to the lifetime risks of graft rejection and immunosuppression[2,3]. The liver has a remarkable capacity for regeneration. But a minimum critical mass of hepatocyte is required to support homeostasis while regeneration progresses after liver damage. Without this critical mass, liver failure supervenes and regeneration is impaired[4]. Artificial liver support systems, such as plasma exchange, hemodialysis and hemofiltration, have been proposed as a temporary liver support that allows the native liver to regenerate[5-7]. But these treatment do not perform many complex functions for survival. Hybrid artificial liver support system (HALSS) is an extracorporeal circulation system comprising of a bioreactor with highly differentiated hepatocytes in hollow fiber space[8]. The large number of highly differentiated hepatocytes is the key to construct HALSS. It has become increasingly evident that three-dimensional rather than monolayer growth is particulary important for maintaining differentiated hepatocyte function in culture. One means of establishing three-dimensional hepatocyte growth is the creation of multicellular spheroid aggregates[8-12]. Here we developed a HALSS that contained a hollow fiber bioreactor inoculated with porcine hepatocyte spheroids and applied it to 10 patients with severe liver failure. The efficacy of the HALSS for treatment of severe liver failure was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals

Chinese suckling pigs weighing about 4.0 kg were supplied by Laboratory Animal Center of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Isolation and spheroid culture of hepatocytes

Hepatocytes were isolated from suckling pigs by modified two-step in situ collagenase perfusion method described by Seglen[13]. The liver was perfused at 4 °C with Hanks solution containing 40 mg/L dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, the USA) through the portal vein to rinse whole blood. At the end of the first perfusion, the liver was excised gently from the surrounding tissue and the isolated liver was placed on the stage of perfusion apparatus. Then the liver was circularly perfused with Hanks solution containing 0.5 g/L collagenase IV (Sigma-Aldrich, America) at 37 °C, which was equilibrated with 950 mL/L O2 and 50 mL/L CO2. The softened liver was gently lifted and placed in ice-cold minimum essential medium (MEM) (GIBCO, Invitrogen). After dissociation of the liver capsule by scissor, the liver was shaken gently in the medium until it was reduced to only connective tissue. The resulting cell suspension was filtered through 50 µm sterile stainless steel meshes. The hepatocytes were washed three times at 500 r/min for 1 min each.

The hepatocyte suspension was adjusted to 5×106/mL in warmed dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (D-MEM) culture medium supplemented with 0.1 µmol/L dexamethasone, 10 µg/L hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), 20 µg/L epidermal growth factor (EGF), 1×insulin-transferrin- selenium solution (GIBCO, Invitrogen), 10 mg/L linoleic acid, 200 mmoL glutamine, 50 mL/L fetal bovine serum, 0.1 µg/L CuSO4.5H2O, 50 pmoL ZnSO4.7H2O, 15 mmoL HEPES, 125 mg/L penicillin and 100 mg/L streptomycin. The cells suspension was then placed in a 50 mL/L CO2 and 950 mL/L air humidified incubator at 37 °C and immediately stirred with a magnetic stirrer at 120 r/min. Air from the incubator was blown into the flask from the open side of the spinner flask by an air pump. The medium was changed every 24 h. Albumin secretion and urea synthesis were measured in the medium of the spheroid culture according to the method described by Chen et al[14] with the petri dish culture at the same density as control.

Configuration of bioartificial liver

The HALSS was constructed as shown in Figure 1. The formed spheroid hepatocytes containing 1-2×1010 highly differentiated primary porcine hepatocytes in DMEM medium were inoculated into the outer space of the hollow fibers of the bioreactor (Languna Hills). A hepatocytes reservoir was designed to connect to the extra-fiber compartment of the bioreactor just as described by Ding et al[15,16]. Blood was removed from the patient through a double lumen catheter in superficial femoral vein at a rate of 100 mL/min and run through a plasma separator. The separated plasma passed a hemo-adsorba 160 for removing bilirubin and toxin, and then it was run through the intra-fiber compartment of bioreactor. The reacted plasma was then reconstituted with red blood cells and returned to the patient via the venous cannula.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of HALSS.
Clinical treatment

All patients were at the end stage of severe liver failure according to the diagnostic standard defined in Xi’an meeting in China in 2000. Ten patients (including 7 males and 3 females, and 8 patients were infected with hepatitis B and 2 patients were infected with hepatitis E) with severe liver failure were assigned to HALSS group. Ten patients (2 females, 8 males) were assigned to Plasmapheresis group. And another ten patients were assigned to control group. There was no significant difference in symptoms and biochemical index between the two groups (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical feature of patients.
HALSS group (n = 10)Plasmapheresis group (n = 10)Control group (n = 10)
Sex
Male323
Female787
Average age (yr)39.541.540.5
Range (yr)35-5627-6030-58
Encephalopathy421
Ascites867
Hepatorenal syndrome977
Biochemical index
Tbil (mmol/L)499.5±25.1519.4±137.5496.3±93.2
Dbil (mmol/L)227.5±19.0269.6±118.4286.5±107.3
ALT (U/L)347.6±126.5303.2±139.4336.2±139.6
ALB (g/L)29.8±0.429.9±5.330.9±5.3
PTA17.5±1.222.8±6.521.5±4.4
Biochemical analysis

Blood samples were obtained at the start and end of the treatment. Blood alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin (TBil) and albumin (ALB) were determined with an automatic biochemical analyzer. Prothrombin activity (PTA) was detected according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as mean±SD. Paired t test was used (SPSS10.0 software) to compare the data. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS
Cell morphology and viability

The number of cells per liver was about 2-4×1010 (mean, 3.1±1.5×1010). The cell viabilities were more than 95% (Figure 2). After 24 h of spheroid culture, most hepatocytes formed spheroids (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Figure 2 Morphology of hepatocytes. A: freshly isolated single hepatocytes stained with trypan blue (×200); B: spheroid formation after 24 h of spheroid culture (×100).
Metabolites secretion in culture

The functions about albumin production and urea synthesis are shown in Figure 3. The levels of albumin and urea in the medium of spheroid culture were higher than those in supernatant of petri dish culture (P = 0.0015, 0.0001, respectively). The capacity of albumin production and urea synthesis was constant for more than one week and declined rapidly after two weeks.

Figure 3
Figure 3 Spheroid cultivation of hepatocytes at a density of 5×106/mL cells. Control hepatocytes were cultivated in a petri dish at the same density. A: albumin production; B: urea synthesis.
Clinical effect of HALSS

In HALSS group, the duration of HALSS treatment was 6-10 h each time. All patients tolerated the treatment well without any fatal adverse reaction. After HALSS treatment, general condition, psychic state, encephalopathy and hepatic function of the patients were improved (Table 2). The survival rate of the HALSS group, Plasmapheresis group and control group was 30% (3/10), 20% (2/10) and 0% (0/10), respectively (P = 0.024). Two weeks after treatment, TBil and ALT decreased and the level of PTA elevated in HALSS group and Plasmapheresis group (P value is 0.015 vs 0.020, 0.009 vs 0.012 and 0.032 vs 0.041, respectively). But there was no significant change of blood albumin concentration before and after the HALSS treatment (Figure 4).

Table 2 General condition of patients at two weeks after treatment.
HALSS group (n = 10)
Plasmapheresis group (n = 10)
Control group (n = 10)
Pre-Post-Pre-Post-Pre-Post-
Encephalopathy422212
Ascites836379
Hepatorenal syndrome937379
Figure 4
Figure 4 Changes of total bilirubin, ALT, albumin and PTA index in patients in HALSS group, Plasmapheresis group and control group. Pre-: index before treatment. Post-: index at two weeks after treatment.
DISCUSSION

Acute or acute-on-chronic liver failure is a life-threatening condition. Most of the cases are caused by viral hepatitis, such as hepatitis B and C, in China. The mortality of liver failure is very high, more than 70%[17]. Liver transplantation is an effective therapy for many severe hepatic failure, but the number of patients who can benefit from this procedure is limited by the availability of donor organs[17,18]. Alternative therapy including liver cell transplantation and artificial livers has been developed. The non-bioartificial livers consisted of haemofiltration, hemoperfusion, plasma exchange and molecular adsorbents recycling system[6,19-21]. These devices could remove toxic factors, including ammonia, endotoxin, mercaptans and endogenous inhibitor neurotansmitters. But some factors, which are involved in hepatic regeneration, such as interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, hepatocyte growth factor and albumin-bilirubin complex might also be removed[22]. And they cannot replace the complex functions of liver such as synthetic and metabolic functions. On this condition, bioartificial liver has been developed to support liver functions temporarily[4,15,16,23,24].

The large numbers of highly differentiated primary hepatocytes are demanded for configuration of bioartificial liver. Primary human hepatocytes divide much less readily in vitro even under optimal culture conditions[25]. Cell lines and stem cells are still under study, and they cannot be used for clinical treatment currently[11,26]. Primary porcine hepatocytes are the most common cellular components of current bioartificial liver devices[27]. Hepatocytes in monolayer culture lose their functions quickly in vitro and the density of heaptocytes in monolayer cannot satisfy the needs for configuration of bioreactor. Hepatocytes multicellular aggregates that have a tissue-like structure expressed highly differentiated functions[24,28]. Spheroidal aggregates of hepatocytes are known to exhibit better hepatocyte functions for a longer timer than hepatocytes produced by monolayer culture[10,29]. Our data showed that functions of albumin production and urea synthesis of spheroidal hepatocytes were better than that of monolayter cultured hepatocytes (P<0.05). The functions of spheroidal hepatocytes were stable more than one week in the medium supplemented with growth factors and hormones, but they declined quickly after two weeks in vitro. The density of spheroid culture was enough to meet the needs of large numbers of hepatocytes for configuration of bioartificial liver.

Blood from the patients with severe liver failure has many toxins in it, which are harmful to living hepatocytes[30]. In HALSS, the blood from the patients was detoxified with a hemo-adsorba 160 and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) before it was run through a bioreactor. To ensure that enough hepatocytes were used, a hepatocyte reservoir was added to the system.

Data from clinical study showed that HALSS improved general condition, encephalopathy and biochemical indexes, including ALT, TBil and PTA of patients. But the albumin level was not changed, which was in agreement with the previous study by Ding et al[16]. The survival rate of HALSS treatment group was also higher than that of the Plasmapheresis group and control group (30% vs 0%). It suggest that the HALSS significantly prolong the survival time of the patients.

On the basis of the above mentioned results, the HALSS established by us is effective for the treatment of severe liver failure.

Footnotes

Edited by Kumar M and Ma JY

References
1.  Jauregui HO, Chowdhury NR, Chowdhury JR. Use of mammalian liver cells for artificial liver support. Cell Transplant. 1996;5:353-367.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Shaw BW. Auxiliary liver transplantation for acute liver failure. Liver Transpl Surg. 1995;1:194-200.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Everhart JE, Lombardero M, Detre KM, Zetterman RK, Wiesner RH, Lake JR, Hoofnagle JH. Increased waiting time for liver transplantation results in higher mortality. Transplantation. 1997;64:1300-1306.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 70]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Court FG, Wemyss-Holden SA, Dennison AR, Maddern GJ. Bioartificial liver support devices: historical perspectives. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:739-748.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Steczko J, Ash SR, Blake DE, Carr DJ, Bosley RH. Cytokines and endotoxin removal by sorbents and its application in push-pull sorbent-based pheresis: the BioLogic-DTPF System. Artif Organs. 1999;23:310-318.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Stange J, Mitzner SR, Risler T, Erley CM, Lauchart W, Goehl H, Klammt S, Peszynski P, Freytag J, Hickstein H. Molecular adsorbent recycling system (MARS): clinical results of a new membrane-based blood purification system for bioartificial liver support. Artif Organs. 1999;23:319-330.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 268]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 278]  [Article Influence: 11.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Matsubara S. Combination of plasma exchange and continuous hemofiltration as temporary metabolic support for patients with acute liver failure. Artif Organs. 1994;18:363-366.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Jasmund I, Langsch A, Simmoteit R, Bader A. Cultivation of primary porcine hepatocytes in an OXY-HFB for use as a bioartificial liver device. Biotechnol Prog. 2002;18:839-846.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Kong LB, Chen S, Demetriou AA, Rozga J. Matrix-induced liver cell aggregates (MILCA) for bioartificial liver use. Int J Artif Organs. 1996;19:72-78.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Okubo H, Matsushita M, Kamachi H, Kawai T, Takahashi M, Fujimoto T, Nishikawa K, Todo S. A novel method for faster formation of rat liver cell spheroids. Artif Organs. 2002;26:497-505.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Chen JP, Yu SC, Hsu BR, Fu SH, Liu HS. Loofa sponge as a scaffold for the culture of human hepatocyte cell line. Biotechnol Prog. 2003;19:522-527.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Hamilton GA, Westmorel C, George AE. Effects of medium composition on the morphology and function of rat hepatocytes cultured as spheroids and monolayers. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2001;37:656-667.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Seglen PO. Preparation of isolated rat liver cells. Methods Cell Biol. 1976;13:29-83.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3785]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3859]  [Article Influence: 80.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Chen Z, Ding Y, Zhang H. Morphology, viability and functions of suckling pig hepatocytes cultured in serum-free medium at high density. Dig Surg. 2002;19:184-191.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Chen Z, Ding Y, Xu Q, Yu D. Bioartificial liver inoculated with porcine hepatocyte spheroids for treatment of canine acute liver failure model. Artif Organs. 2003;27:613-622.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Ding YT, Qiu YD, Chen Z, Xu QX, Zhang HY, Tang Q, Yu DC. The development of a new bioartificial liver and its application in 12 acute liver failure patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:829-832.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Muraca M. Cell therapy as support or alternative to liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2003;35:1047-1048.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Allen JW, Hassanein T, Bhatia SN. Advances in bioartificial liver devices. Hepatology. 2001;34:447-455.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 265]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 267]  [Article Influence: 11.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Mitzner SR, Stange J, Klammt S, Peszynski P, Schmidt R, Nöldge-Schomburg G. Extracorporeal detoxification using the molecular adsorbent recirculating system for critically ill patients with liver failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12 Suppl 17:S75-S82.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Stange J, Mitzner SR, Klammt S, Freytag J, Peszynski P, Loock J, Hickstein H, Korten G, Schmidt R, Hentschel J. Liver support by extracorporeal blood purification: a clinical observation. Liver Transpl. 2000;6:603-613.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 105]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 102]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Stange J, Hassanein TI, Mehta R, Mitzner SR, Bartlett RH. The molecular adsorbents recycling system as a liver support system based on albumin dialysis: a summary of preclinical investigations, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial, and clinical experience from 19 centers. Artif Organs. 2002;26:103-110.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 154]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 164]  [Article Influence: 7.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Davies E, Hodgson HJ. Artificial livers--what's keeping them? Gut. 1995;36:168-170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Mizumoto H, Funatsu K. Liver regeneration using a hybrid artificial liver support system. Artif Organs. 2004;28:53-57.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Funatsu K, Ijima H, Nakazawa K, Yamashita Y, Shimada M, Sugimachi K. Hybrid artificial liver using hepatocyte organoid culture. Artif Organs. 2001;25:194-200.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 80]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 78]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Runge D, Runge DM, Jäger D, Lubecki KA, Beer Stolz D, Karathanasis S, Kietzmann T, Strom SC, Jungermann K, Fleig WE. Serum-free, long-term cultures of human hepatocytes: maintenance of cell morphology, transcription factors, and liver-specific functions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;269:46-53.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 80]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 82]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Alison MR, Vig P, Russo F, Bigger BW, Amofah E, Themis M, Forbes S. Hepatic stem cells: from inside and outside the liver? Cell Prolif. 2004;37:1-21.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 115]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 124]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Allen JW, Bhatia SN. Improving the next generation of bioartificial liver devices. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2002;13:447-454.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Sakai Y, Naruse K, Nagashima I, Muto T, Suzuki M. Large-scale preparation and function of porcine hepatocyte spheroids. Int J Artif Organs. 1996;19:294-301.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Yagi K, Tsuda K, Serada M, Yamada C, Kondoh A, Miura Y. Rapid formation of multicellular spheroids of adult rat hepatocytes by rotation culture and their immobilization within calcium alginate. Artif Organs. 1993;17:929-934.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Stefanovich P, Matthew HW, Toner M, Tompkins RG, Yarmush ML. Extracorporeal plasma perfusion of cultured hepatocytes: effect of intermittent perfusion on hepatocyte function and morphology. J Surg Res. 1996;66:57-63.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]