Nan HM, Song YJ, Yun HY, Park JS, Kim H. Effects of dietary intake and genetic factors on hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(25): 3834-3841 [PMID: 15991278 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i25.3834]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Heon Kim, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, 12 Kaeshin-dong, Hungdok-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungbuk 361-763, Republic of Korea. kimheon@cbu.ac.kr
Article-Type of This Article
Gastric Cancer
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Hong-Mei Nan, Heon Kim, Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
Young-Jin Song, Hyo-Yung Yun, Departments of Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea
Joo-Seung Park, Department of Surgery, Eulji University, School of Medicine, Daejon, Republic of Korea
ORCID number: $[AuthorORCIDs]
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by the Korea Health 21 R and D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea. No. 00-PJ1-PG3-21900-0008
Correspondence to: Heon Kim, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, 12 Kaeshin-dong, Hungdok-gu, Cheongju-si, Chungbuk 361-763, Republic of Korea. kimheon@cbu.ac.kr
Telephone: +82-43-261-2864 Fax: +82-43-274-2965
Received: October 9, 2004 Revised: December 20, 2004 Accepted: December 23, 2004 Published online: July 7, 2005
Abstract
AIM: Hypermethylation of the promoter of the hMLH1 gene, which plays an important role in mismatch repair during DNA replication, occurs in more than 30% of human gastric cancer tissues. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of environmental factors, genetic polymorphisms of major metabolic enzymes, and microsatellite instability on hypermethylation of the promoter of the hMLH1 gene in gastric cancer.
METHODS: Data were obtained from a hospital-based, case-control study of gastric cancer. One hundred and ten gastric cancer patients and 220 age- and sex-matched control patients completed a structured questionnaire regarding their exposure to environmental risk factors. Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter, polymorphisms of the GSTM1, GSTT1, CYP1A1, CYP2E1, ALDH2 and L-myc genes, microsatellite instability and mutations of p53 and Ki-ras genes were investigated.
RESULTS: Both smoking and alcohol consumption were associated with a higher risk of gastric cancer with hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter. High intake of vegetables and low intake of potato were associated with increased likelihood of gastric cancer with hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter. Genetic polymorphisms of the GSTM1, GSTT1, CYP1A1, CYP2E1, ALDH2, and L-myc genes were not significantly associated with the risk of gastric cancer either with or without hypermethylation in the promoter of the hMLH1 gene. Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter was significantly associated with microsatellite instability (MSI): 10 of the 14 (71.4%) MSI-positive tumors showed hypermethylation, whereas 28 of 94 (29.8%) the MSI-negative tumors were hypermethylated at the hMLH1 promoter region. Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter was significantly inversely correlated with mutation of the p53 gene.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption may influence the development of hMLH1-positive gastric cancer. Most dietary factors and polymorphisms of GSTM1, GSTT1, CYP1A1, CYP2E1, ALDH2, and L-myc genes are not independent risk factors for gastric cancer with hyperme-thylation of the hMLH1 promoter. These data also suggest that there could be two or more different molecular pathways in the development of gastric cancer, perhaps involving tumor suppression mechanisms or DNA mismatch repair.
Citation: Nan HM, Song YJ, Yun HY, Park JS, Kim H. Effects of dietary intake and genetic factors on hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(25): 3834-3841
Gastric cancer is the most common cancer among Koreans. Environmental factors including cigarette smoking and dietary intake have been implicated in the etiology of gastric cancer[1-4]. Genetic polymorphisms of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes can also affect susceptibility to cancer. Several studies have reported that the genetic polymorphisms of metabolic enzymes, such as cytochrome p450 2E1 (CYP2E1)[5], glutathione S-transferase mu 1 (GSTM1)[6], glutathione S-transferase theta 1 (GSTT1)[7], aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2)[8], and L-myc proto-oncogene[9], and mutations of p53[10] and Ki-ras[11] genes are associated with the development of gastric cancer.
Promoter hypermethylation is an alternative mechanism of gene inactivation in carcinogenesis[12]. Several studies have suggested that aberrant methylation of the promoter causes transcriptional silencing of some important suppressor genes, such as p16[13], E-cadherin[14], and von Hippel Lindau (VHL) gene[15], and this has been implicated in the carcinogenic process in many cancers[12]. In addition, it was recently shown that hypermethylation of gene promoters increases along the pathway of development from chronic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and adenomas to carcinomas of the stomach[16,17].
The hMLH1 protein, a mismatch repair enzyme, maintains the fidelity of the genome during cellular proliferation. It has no known enzymatic activity and probably acts as a ‘molecular matchmaker’, recruiting other DNA-repair proteins to the mismatch repair complex[18]. Dysfunction of a mismatch repair system such as hMLH1 and hMSH2 could alter microsatellites, short tandem repetitive sequences[19]. Several reports have suggested that hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter correlates with a loss of expression of the gene, resulting in microsatellite instability in gastric cancer[20,21].
There is evidence that diet may be associated with hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter in gastric cancer. Aberrant hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter is frequently observed in cancers of digestive organs such as the colon, rectum, and stomach[21,22], and decreased levels of folate, vitamin C, and niacin can induce hypermethylation of gene promoters[23]. These facts led us to hypothesize that genetic polymorphisms and environmental factors, such as cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and diet, may interact during the hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter and in the carcinogenesis of gastric cancer. We studied the association between hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter and environmental factors, genetic polymorphisms of major metabolic enzymes, genetic mutation of p53 and Ki-ras genes, and microsatellite instability in gastric cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
One hundred and ten individuals with gastric cancer and 220 age-matched (within 3 years) and sex-matched controls were enrolled in this study. Cases of cancer were all histologically confirmed from February 1997 to June 2002 at Chungbuk National University Hospital and Eulji University Hospital, Korea. Control subjects were selected from patients newly diagnosed with diseases other than cancer at the same hospitals or from individuals receiving routine medical examinations in Chungbuk National University Hospital. Table 1 shows the age and gender distribution of the subjects according to hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter. The mean ± SD ages were 59.81 ± 11.23 years for cases and 59.60 ± 11.03 years for controls. This study was conducted in accordance with the recommendations outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and all subjects provided written informed consent.
Table 1 Gender and age distribution of cases and controls.
Cases
Controls
Gender
Male
70
140
Female
40
80
Age (yr)
– 39
6
12
40 – 49
11
22
50 – 59
34
68
60 – 69
40
80
70 –
19
38
Exposure to environmental factors
Trained interviewers interviewed subjects using a structured questionnaire within a month after the diagnosis of gastric cancer or benign diseases or at the time of the hospital visit for control subjects undergoing routine medical examination. The questionnaire included questions on demographic factors, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, and diet. Dietary data were collected using a semiquantitative food frequency table previously evaluated for validity and reliability[24]. All subjects were asked about their average frequency of consumption and portion size of 89 common food items during the year preceding the interview. These items were classified into 21 food groups having similar ingredients. The 21 food groups were as follows: cereals; potato; nuts; noodles; breads and cakes; vegetables; mushrooms; fruits; meats; eggs; fishes and shellfishes; stews; chicken; kimchi; soybean foods; soybean pastes; milk and dairy products; butter, cheeses, and margarine; jams, honey, candies, and chocolates; coffee and tea; seaweeds; and alliums.
The amount of calories, nutrients, vitamins, and minerals consumed for each food item was estimated by multiplying the intake amount of the food item and its nutrient value. The total intake of calories, nutrients, vitamins, and minerals was calculated for each subject by summing the respective calories, nutrients, vitamins, and minerals for each food item[25]. The intake amounts of these factors were adjusted for caloric intake using the method of Willett et al[26].
Analysis of genetic polymorphisms
Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral leukocytes by proteinase K digestion and phenol-chloroform extraction. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method[27] was used simultaneously to detect the presence or absence of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes with slight modification. The primers used were 5’-GAA GGT GGC CTC CTC CTT GG-3’ and 5’-AAT TCT GGA TTG TAG CAG AT-3’ for GSTM1, 5’-TTC CTT ACT GGT CCT CAC ATC TC-3’ and 5’-TCA CCG GAT CAT GGC CAG CA-3’ for GSTT1, and 5’-CAA CTT CAT CCA CGT TCA CC-3’ and 5’-GAA GAG CCA AGG ACA GTT AC-3’ for β-globin, the internal reference gene. The PCR reactions were performed in 25 μL of a solution containing 50 ng of genomic DNA, 1× PCR buffer [50 mmol/L KCl, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, and 0.1% Triton X-100], 5 pmoL of each primer, 80 μmol/L each dNTP, and 2.0 units Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI). Amplifications were carried out in a thermocycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA) as follows: 5 min of denaturation at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles consisting of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 58°C for 1 min, and extension at 74°C for 1 min. PCR products were separated on 2% agarose gels with ethidium bromide. GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes were not scored unless the PCR product of the β-globin gene was evident.
The A4889G polymorphism in exon 7 of the CYP1A1 gene was analyzed for each subject as described previously[28]. Briefly, PCR was performed using the primers 5’-GAA CTG CCA CTT CAG CTG TC-3’ and 5’-GAA AGA CCT CCC AGC GGT CA-3’. The temperature program for the PCR reaction was slightly modified. After initial denaturation for 5 min at 94°C, a thermal cycle consisting of denaturation for 90 s at 94°C, annealing for 90 s at 53°C, and extension for 30 s at 74°C, was repeated 35 times. The PCR products (187-bp fragments) were digested with HincII restriction enzyme at 37°C overnight and subjected to electrophoresis on 12% polyacrylamide gels. PCR analysis resulted in the following genotype classification: a predominant homozygote (Ile/Ile), a heterozygote (Ile/Val), and a rare homozygote (Val/Val).
The 5’-flanking region polymorphism of the CYP2E1 gene was analyzed using procedures described previously[29]. Briefly, PCR was performed using the primers 5’-CCA GTC GAG TCT ACA TTG TCA-3’ and 5’-TTC ATT CTG TCT TCT AAC TGG-3’. Initial denaturation was performed at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 thermal cycles consisting of denaturation for 1 min at 94°C, annealing for 1 min at 53°C, and extension for 30 s at 74°C. The 410-bp PCR product was digested with RsaI at 37°C overnight and subjected to electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels. The genotypes of CYP2E1 were classified as follows: a predominant homozygote (c1/c1), a heterozygote (c1/c2), and a rare homozygote (c2/c2).
The MboII polymorphism of ALDH2 was identified using a PCR-RFLP method[30] with slight modification. Briefly, PCR was performed using the primers 5’-CCA CAC TCA CAG TTT TCT CTT-3’ and 5’-AAA TTA CAG GGT CAA CTG CT-3’. We used the same PCR conditions as in the CYP1A1 gene analysis. The 134-bp amplicon was digested with MboII restriction enzyme at 37°C overnight and subjected to electrophoresis on 15% polyacrylamide gels. The genotypes of ALDH2 were identified as the predominant homozygote (NN), the heterozygote (ND), and the rare homozygote (DD).
The polymorphism of the L-myc gene was analyzed using procedures described previously[31]. Briefly, PCR was performed using the primers 5’-ACG GCT GGT GGA GTG GTA GA-3’ and 5’-AAG CTT GAG CCC CTT TGT CA-3’. Initial denaturation was performed at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 thermal cycles consisting of denaturation for 45 s at 95°C, annealing for 40 s at 60°C, and extension for 40 s at 74°C. The amplified 613-bp PCR product was directly digested with the restriction enzyme EcoRI at 37°C overnight and separated by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels. The genotypes of L-myc were classified as follows: a predominant homozygote (LL), a heterozygote (LS), and a rare homozygote (SS).
Methylation-specific PCR for hMLH1 promoter
Tissue samples from gastric cancer patients were immediately frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen until analysis. DNA was extracted using a DNA extraction kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The promoter methylation status of the hMLH1 gene was determined by methylation-specific PCR (MSP), as described previously[32]. MSP distinguishes unmethylated from hypermethylated alleles in a given gene based on sequence changes produced after bisulfite treatment of DNA, which converts unmethylated, but not methylated, cytosines to uracils. Briefly, 2 µg of genomic DNA was denatured by treatment with NaOH and modified by sodium bisulfite. DNA samples were then purified using a Wizard DNA Purification Resin (Promega), treated again with NaOH, precipitated with ethanol, and resuspended in water. Modified DNA was amplified using the primer pairs as follows: 5’-TTT TGA TGT AGA TGT TTT ATT AGG GTT GT-3’ and 5’-ACC ACC TCA TCA TAA CTA CCC ACA-3’ for the unmethylated reaction (124-bp), and 5’-ACG TAG ACG TTT TAT TAG GGT CGC-3’ and 5’-CCT CAT CGT AAC TAC CCG CG-3’ for the methylated reaction (115-bp)[32]. PCR was performed in a thermocycler (MJ Research) as follows: 5 min of denaturation at 95°C, then 35 cycles consisting of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s. PCR products were separated on 6% polyacrylamide gels with ethidium bromide. DNA from blood samples was used as a negative control for hypermethylated hMLH1.
Microsatellite instability
Microsatellite instability (MSI) was examined using BAT25 and BAT26 mononucleotide microsatellite markers. PCR was performed in a 25 µL reaction volume containing 50 ng of genomic DNA, 1× PCR buffer, 5 pmoL of each primer, 80 µmol/L each dNTP, 2.0 units Taq polymerase (Takara, Shiga, Japan), and 0.2 µ Ci of α -32P-labeled dCTP. Amplifications were carried out as follows: 5 min of denaturation at 95°C, then 35 cycles consisting of denaturation at 95°C for 50 s, annealing at 58°C for 90 s, and extension at 72°C for 90 s. Two microliters of PCR product was electrophoresed on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels containing 6 mol/L urea at room temperature. The gels were dried and autoradiographed on X-ray film. MSI-positive results were identified when the mobility of the microsatellite fragment amplified from tumor DNA differed from the corresponding blood DNA. Tumors were considered microsatellite instability-positive (MSI+) if they manifested instability at one or two loci or microsatellite instability-negative (MSI-) if no unstable microsatellite was found.
Sequencing of p53 and Ki-ras genes
Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and direct sequencing methods were used to detect mutations in p53 and Ki-ras genes. Briefly, tissues from gastric cancer patients were homogenized and RNA was isolated using TRIzol solution (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). RT-PCR to amplify p53 and Ki-ras cDNA were performed using reagents purchased from Promega. Specific primers synthesized by Bioneer Company (Cheongju, South Korea), Ex Taq polymerase (Takara), dNTPs, MgCl2, PCR buffer, and cDNA template were mixed and then amplified for 40 cycles at 95°C for 30 s and at 72°C for 1 min. The cDNA regions were amplified using primers 5’-TCT AGA GCC ACC GTC CAG GGA G-3’ and 5’-AAC CTC AGG CGG CTC ATA GGG CA-3’ for the +2-+810 region of p53, and 5’-ACC AGG GCA GCT ACG GTT TCC GT-3’ and 5’-TCA GTC TGA ATC AGG CCC TTC TGT-3’ for the +443-+1 317 region of p53. Exons 1 and 2 of the Ki-ras gene were amplified using primers 5’-GAC TGA ATA TAA ACG TGT GGT AG-3’ and 5’-ACT GGT CCC TCA TTG CAC TG-3’. Before the RT-PCR products were sequenced by cycle sequencing, a PCR purification kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) was used to remove unwanted reagents from the PCR reaction. The purified PCR products were then directly cycle-sequenced using an ABI PRISM 3100 Avant Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Data analysis
Calorie-adjusted intakes of foods, nutrients, vitamins, and minerals were categorized into low- and high-intake groups based on the median values of the control population. Alcohol consumption per week was calculated from questions about the types, frequency, and average amount of alcohol consumed. Alcohol consumption was categorized into three groups: none, ≤ 280 g of alcohol/week, and > 280 g of alcohol/week. Subjects who had smoked 20 cigarettes or more during their life were classified as smokers and those who had not were considered nonsmokers. Pack-year was used as an index of cumulative smoking.
The purpose of the study was to determine if dietary factors, genetic polymorphisms, MSI, and mutations of p53 and Ki-ras genes were associated with hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter. We used unconditional logistic analysis to compare the risk of exhibiting or not exhibiting hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter in tumors and controls using the SAS System for Windows (Release 8.1). P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS
There were significant differences according to the smoking history, pack-years, and higher weekly alcohol intake between patients with gastric cancers with hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter and controls (Table 2). As the amount of cigarette smoking or alcohol drinking increased, the risk of gastric cancer with the hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation (Table 3).
Table 2 Interaction between cigarette smoking and alcohol intake, and hMLH1 gene promoter hypermethylation in gastric cancer.
High consumption of potatoes and butter, cheese and margarine was associated with lower risk of gastric cancer with hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter. In contrast, consumption of vegetables was associated with higher risk of gastric cancer with hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter. High intake of mushrooms and fruits and low intake of cereals and butter, cheese and margarine were associated with higher risk of gastric cancer without hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter (Table 4). Among the nutrients, vitamins, and minerals evaluated, high intake of protein, phosphorus, potassium, vitamin C, zinc, and calcium was associated with higher risk of gastric cancer without hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter. However, the intake of nutrients, vitamins, and minerals did not differ significantly between patients with gastric cancers with the hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation, those with gastric cancers without it, or controls (Table 5).
Table 4 Distribution of controls and cases with or without promoter hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene according to their intake of food groups which were statistically significant.
Table 5 Distribution of controls and cases with or without promoter hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene according to their intake of nutrients, vitamins, and minerals which were statistically significant.
Genetic polymorphism of GSTM1, GSTT1, CYP1A1, CYP2E1, ALDH2 and L-myc was not associated with development of gastric cancers with the hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation or those without it (Table 6).
Table 6 Distribution of controls and cases with or without promoter hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene according to the genetic poly-morphisms of GSTM1, GSTT1, CYP1A1, CYP2E1, NAT2, ALDH2, and L-myc.
Controls
Cases without
Cases with
(n)
hMLH1 promoter
hMLH1 promoter
hypermethylation
hypermethylation
(n)
(n)
GSTM1
Undeleted
90
21
13
Deleted
130
48
25
Odds ratio
Referent (1.00)
1.67 (0.93 – 3.00)
1.18 (0.56 – 2.47)
GSTT1
Undeleted
117
32
17
Deleted
103
37
21
Odds ratio
Referent (1.00)
1.32 (0.76 – 2.29)
1.47 (0.72 – 2.98)
CYP1A1
Ile/Ile
115
36
22
Ile/Val+Val/Val
104
33
15
Odds ratio
Referent (1.00)
1.02 (0.59 – 1.77)
0.74 (0.36 – 1.52)
CYP2E1
c1/c1
129
44
25
c1/c2+c2/c2
88
26
13
Odds ratio
Referent (1.00)
0.89 (0.51 – 1.56)
0.76 (0.37 – 1.59)
ALDH2
NN
139
38
26
ND+DD
79
31
11
Odds ratio
Referent (1.00)
1.45 (0.83 – 2.52)
0.73 (0.34 – 1.56)
L-myc
Low
52
20
9
High
164
48
29
Odds ratio
Referent (1.00)
1.59 (0.86 – 2.92)
1.56 (0.61 – 3.99)
Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter was detected in 35.2% of patients with gastric cancer, in 13.6% of those with MSI, in 28.2% of those with mutations of p53, and in 4.9% of those with the Ki-ras gene (data not shown). Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter occurred in 10 of 14 MSI+ cases (71.4%) and in 28 of 94 MSI- cases (29.8%). We found a striking association between hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter and MSI (Table 7). Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter was significantly inversely correlated with mutation of the p53 gene (Table 7).
Table 7 Frequencies of mutations of the p53 and Ki-ras genes, and microsatellite instability according to hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation.
Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption have been identified as risk factors for gastric cancer in some studies[33-36], although others have not found a causal relationship between these factors[37,38]. Data from our unconditional logistic models showed that both cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption play dominant roles in the development of gastric cancer with hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter, but not in the development of cancer without hypermethylation of the promoter. This finding suggests that smoking- or alcohol-related biological pathways leading to the development of gastric cancer involve hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter. Although it is unclear whether smoking induces hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter in humans, recent reports indicate an association between DNA methylation and tobacco carcinogens in animal models[39,40]. Previous studies have also shown that smoking and alcohol consumption increase the risk of developing microsatellite-unstable tumors[41,42].
The exact mechanism of DNA hypermethylation by alcohol is unknown. However, it has been hypothesized that alcohol could influence carcinogenesis by influencing mucosal cell proliferation and related histological changes[43]. These changes have been associated with mucosal hyper-regeneration, which may make the mucosa more susceptible to the action of other carcinogens such as cigarette smoke[43]. Therefore, alcohol consumption might increase the bio-availability of DNA-binding smoke components in the mucosa of the upper digestive tract, increasing the plasma levels of these compounds, or might modify the metabolism of pro-carcinogenic compounds by inducing specific metabolic pathways involving an aberrant mismatch repair system[44].
Folate deficiency is associated with hypermethylation of the H-cadherin promoter[45]. However, we found no significant association between folate intake and hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter. Su and Arab reported that low folate intake is aggravated by high alcohol intake[46], probably because folate is degraded by acetaldehyde, an intermediate metabolite of alcohol[47]. van Engeland et al[48] suggested that intake of folate and alcohol is associated with changes in promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancer. Our data showing that alcohol intake increased the risk of gastric cancer with hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter are consistent with these previous reports.
Most dietary factors, nutrients, vitamins, and minerals are not associated with gastric cancer with hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter, although we found that a high intake of vegetables and low intake of potato and butter, cheese, and margarine were associated with increased likelihood of gastric cancer without hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter, and high intake of mushrooms and fruits and low intake of cereals and butter, cheese and margarine were associated with higher risk of gastric cancer without hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter. We cannot be certain that these results did not occur by chance, given the low number of comparisons. However, we observed that different dietary factors selectively affected the pathways to gastric cancer with or without hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter. For example, a high intake of butter, cheese, and margarine was associated with a lower risk of gastric cancers either with or without hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter. These findings agree with epidemiological data showing a relatively low incidence of gastric cancer in countries with consumption of high butter, cheese, and margarine[49]. Based on these facts, it could be suggested that butter, cheese and margarine decrease the risk of gastric cancer regardless of the hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation.
It has been reported that vitamin C can induce hypermethylation of gene promoters[23]. However, a higher intake of vitamin C is associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer in this present study. One of the main vitamin C sources for Koreans is kimchi, which has been reported as a potent risk factor for gastric cancer in some Korean epidemiologic studies[3]. Therefore, kimchi intake increases vitamin C intake amount, and, at the same time, the risk of gastric cancer.
Few epidemiological studies on gastric cancer have included genetic polymorphisms in the analysis or evaluated the association between genetic polymorphisms and hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter. Several studies have reported an independent, increased risk of gastric cancer for the GSTM1 null[7], GSTT1 null[6], CYP2E1 c1/c2 or c2/c2[50], *2-allele containing ALDH2 genotypes[9], and shorter (s) allele-containing L-myc[10] genotypes. However, other studies have not found any association between gastric cancer and these genotypes[51-53]. We found no significant association between polymorphisms of GSTM1, GSTT1, CYP1A1, CYP2E1, ALDH2, and L-myc and the risk of gastric cancer with or without hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter. These findings suggest that the genetic polymorphisms of the GSTM1, GSTT1, CYP1A1, CYP2E1, ALDH2, and L-myc genes might not be independent risk factors, but could act as effect modifiers of the risk of gastric cancer through environmental factors, such as dietary intake.
We examined the mononucleotide repeats BAT25 and BAT26 to detect genuine MSI because these repeats are considered as ideal diagnostic markers. Mononucleotide repeats are sufficient for the diagnosis of true MSI[54]. A consensus mononucleotide locus, BAT26 is altered in all tumors with genuine MSI[55,56]. We found that 10 of the 14 MSI+ gastric cancer cases (71%) in our patients were hypermethylated in the promoter region of hMLH1. We found a significant association between hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter and MSI+ gastric carcinoma (P = 0.006), which is consistent with previous reports[21,57].
Point mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene[58,59] and ras oncogenes[60,61] are frequently found in human and rodent tumors. Mutations of the p53 and Ki-ras genes were detected in 28.2% and 4.9% of our patients with gastric cancer, respectively. We also found a significant inverse association between hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter and p53 mutations. Previous studies have reported a significantly lower incidence of p53 gene alterations in MSI+ gastric cancer, in MSI+ colorectal cancers, and in colorectal cancer cell lines[62,63] than in MSI- gastric cancer[64,56]. Together, these data confirm the existence of alternative genetic pathways for gastric cancer, such as the classical ‘tumor suppressor’ pathway and the ‘mismatch repair’ pathway.
In conclusion, despite its limited size, this study suggests that cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption are significantly associated with higher risk of gastric cancer having hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter. Polymorphisms of GSTM1, GSTT1, CYP1A1, CYP2E1, ALDH2, and L-myc genes were not associated with gastric cancers either with or without hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter, suggesting that these polymorphisms operate along disease pathways other than those involving the mismatch repair system in gastric cancer. Our data also highlight the importance of aberrant methylation of the hMLH1 promoter in causing MSI in gastric cancer. The negative association between hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter and p53 mutations suggests that there could be two or more different molecular pathways in the development of gastric cancer, such as tumor suppression mechanisms and DNA mismatch repair.
Yun TK, Choi SY. Preventive effect of ginseng intake against various human cancers: a case-control study on 1987 pairs.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1995;4:401-408.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Nishimoto IN, Hanaoka T, Sugimura H, Nagura K, Ihara M, Li XJ, Arai T, Hamada GS, Kowalski LP, Tsugane S. Cytochrome P450 2E1 polymorphism in gastric cancer in Brazil: case-control studies of Japanese Brazilians and non-Japanese Brazilians.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:675-680.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Setiawan VW, Zhang ZF, Yu GP, Li YL, Lu ML, Tsai CJ, Cordova D, Wang MR, Guo CH, Yu SZ. GSTT1 and GSTM1 null genotypes and the risk of gastric cancer: a case-control study in a Chinese population.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:73-80.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Baylin SB, Herman JG, Graff JR, Vertino PM, Issa JP. Alterations in DNA methylation: a fundamental aspect of neoplasia.Adv Cancer Res. 1998;72:141-196.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Graff JR, Herman JG, Lapidus RG, Chopra H, Xu R, Jarrard DF, Isaacs WB, Pitha PM, Davidson NE, Baylin SB. E-cadherin expression is silenced by DNA hypermethylation in human breast and prostate carcinomas.Cancer Res. 1995;55:5195-5199.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Kang GH, Shim YH, Jung HY, Kim WH, Ro JY, Rhyu MG. CpG island methylation in premalignant stages of gastric carcinoma.Cancer Res. 2001;61:2847-2851.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Fleisher AS, Esteller M, Tamura G, Rashid A, Stine OC, Yin J, Zou TT, Abraham JM, Kong D, Nishizuka S. Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter is associated with microsatellite instability in early human gastric neoplasia.Oncogene. 2001;20:329-335.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 84][Cited by in F6Publishing: 88][Article Influence: 3.8][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Kang GH, Shim YH, Ro JY. Correlation of methylation of the hMLH1 promoter with lack of expression of hMLH1 in sporadic gastric carcinomas with replication error.Lab Invest. 1999;79:903-909.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Fleisher AS, Esteller M, Wang S, Tamura G, Suzuki H, Yin J, Zou TT, Abraham JM, Kong D, Smolinski KN. Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter in human gastric cancers with microsatellite instability.Cancer Res. 1999;59:1090-1095.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Cunningham JM, Christensen ER, Tester DJ, Kim CY, Roche PC, Burgart LJ, Thibodeau SN. Hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter in colon cancer with microsatellite instability.Cancer Res. 1998;58:3455-3460.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Kim MK, Lee SS, Ahn YO. Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered semiquantitative food frequency question-naire among middle-aged men in Seoul.Korean J Commun Nutrit. 1996;1:376-394.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Willett W, Stampfer MJ. Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses.Am J Epidemiol. 1986;124:17-27.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Risch HA, Jain M, Choi NW, Fodor JG, Pfeiffer CJ, Howe GR, Harrison LW, Craib KJ, Miller AB. Dietary factors and the incidence of cancer of the stomach.Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122:947-959.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
You WC, Blot WJ, Chang YS, Ershow AG, Yang ZT, An Q, Henderson B, Xu GW, Fraumeni JF, Wang TG. Diet and high risk of stomach cancer in Shandong, China.Cancer Res. 1988;48:3518-3523.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
McLaughlin JK, Hrubec Z, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF. Stomach cancer and cigarette smoking among U.S. veterans, 1954-1980.Cancer Res. 1990;50:3804.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Nomura A, Grove JS, Stemmermann GN, Severson RK. A prospective study of stomach cancer and its relation to diet, cigarettes, and alcohol consumption.Cancer Res. 1990;50:627-631.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Swafford DS, Middleton SK, Palmisano WA, Nikula KJ, Tesfaigzi J, Baylin SB, Herman JG, Belinsky SA. Frequent aberrant methylation of p16INK4a in primary rat lung tumors.Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:1366-1374.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Lee YW, Klein CB, Kargacin B, Salnikow K, Kitahara J, Dowjat K, Zhitkovich A, Christie NT, Costa M. Carcinogenic nickel silences gene expression by chromatin condensation and DNA methylation: a new model for epigenetic carcinogens.Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:2547-2557.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Izzotti A, Balansky RM, Blagoeva PM, Mircheva ZI, Tulimiero L, Cartiglia C, De Flora S. DNA alterations in rat organs after chronic exposure to cigarette smoke and/or ethanol ingestion.FASEB J. 1998;12:753-758.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Jhaveri MS, Wagner C, Trepel JB. Impact of extracellular folate levels on global gene expression.Mol Pharmacol. 2001;60:1288-1295.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
van Engeland M, Weijenberg MP, Roemen GM, Brink M, de Bruïne AP, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Baylin SB, de Goeij AF, Herman JG. Effects of dietary folate and alcohol intake on promoter methylation in sporadic colorectal cancer: the Netherlands cohort study on diet and cancer.Cancer Res. 2003;63:3133-3137.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Kato S, Onda M, Matsukura N, Tokunaga A, Matsuda N, Yamashita K, Shields PG. Genetic polymorphisms of the cancer related gene and Helicobacter pylori infection in Japanese gastric cancer patients. An age and gender matched case-control study.Cancer. 1996;77:1654-1661.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in F6Publishing: 11][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Deakin M, Elder J, Hendrickse C, Peckham D, Baldwin D, Pantin C, Wild N, Leopard P, Bell DA, Jones P. Glutathione S-transferase GSTT1 genotypes and susceptibility to cancer: studies of interactions with GSTM1 in lung, oral, gastric and colorectal cancers.Carcinogenesis. 1996;17:881-884.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 202][Cited by in F6Publishing: 214][Article Influence: 7.6][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, Sidransky D, Eshleman JR, Burt RW, Meltzer SJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Fodde R, Ranzani GN. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.Cancer Res. 1998;58:5248-5257.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Yamamoto H, Itoh F, Fukushima H, Adachi Y, Itoh H, Hinoda Y, Imai K. Frequent Bax frameshift mutations in gastric cancer with high but not low microsatellite instability.J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 1999;18:103-106.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Leung SY, Yuen ST, Chung LP, Chu KM, Chan AS, Ho JC. hMLH1 promoter methylation and lack of hMLH1 expression in sporadic gastric carcinomas with high-frequency microsatellite instability.Cancer Res. 1999;59:159-164.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Cottu PH, Muzeau F, Estreicher A, Fléjou JF, Iggo R, Thomas G, Hamelin R. Inverse correlation between RER+ status and p53 mutation in colorectal cancer cell lines.Oncogene. 1996;13:2727-2730.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
Strickler JG, Zheng J, Shu Q, Burgart LJ, Alberts SR, Shibata D. p53 mutations and microsatellite instability in sporadic gastric cancer: when guardians fail.Cancer Res. 1994;54:4750-4755.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ]
