Brief Reports Open Access
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2005; 11(24): 3778-3781
Published online Jun 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i24.3778
Dynamic change of epidermal growth factor in neonatal rat with intestine injury
Hui Lu, Jun Li, Xin-Dong Xue, Department of Pediatrics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
Li-Li Pan, Central Laboratory, the Second Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Dr. Hui Lu, Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, 36 Sanhao Street, Heping District, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China. luhui6699@sina.com
Telephone: +86-24-83956507
Received: October 26, 2004
Revised: October 28, 2004
Accepted: November 26, 2004
Published online: June 28, 2005

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether diminished levels of epidermal growth factor (EGF) were present in neo-natal rats with intestinal injury and related with the degree of intestinal injury, so we modeled a model in neo-natal rats of intestinal injury and to examine the dynamic levels of EGF on injury of intestine.

METHODS: One-day-old Wistar rat pups received an intraperitoneally injection with 4 mg/kg lipopolysaccharide (LPS), followed by collection of ileum tissue at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h following LPS administration. The ileum was for histological evaluation of NEC and for measurements of EGF using ABC-ELISA. The correlation between the degree of intestinal injury and levels of EGF was determined.

RESULTS: The LPS-injected pups also showed a significant increase in injury scores at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h [respectively, (1.08±0.61), (1.63±0.84), (1.95±0.72), (2.42±0.43) and (2.21±0.53)] vs the control (0.12±0.17) (P<0.01). EGF levels at 1, 3, 6, 12 h [respectively, (245.6±49.0), (221.4±39.0), (223.4±48.1), (246.0±46.6)] pg/mg were significantly loss than the control (275.6±50.4) pg/mg (P<0.05). There was a significant negative correlation between the EGF levels and the grade of intestinal injury within 24 h (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION: Neo-natal rats with intestinal injury have significantly lower levels of ileum EGF. Reduced levels of this growth factor might be related to the pathogenesis of NEC.

Key Words: Epidermal growth factor; Necrotizing enterocolitis; Rat; Newborn



INTRODUCTION

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a common and devastating gastrointestinal condition of premature infants[1]. The etiology of NEC appears to be multifactorial, with prematurity, enteral feeding of formula, intestinal hypoxia/ischemia, and bacterial colonization recognized as major risk factors[2,3]. These components probably act in concert to upset an already immature and delicate intestinal mucosal barrier[4]. In spite of extensive epidemiological, clinical, and basic research, the pathogenesis of NEC is not completely understood and there is no effective preventative treatment for this disease[5].

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a heat stable 53-amino acid peptide, which is secreted into the gut lumen by the Salivary glands, Brunner’s glands of the duodenum, kidneys and also by the ulcer-associated cell lineage (UACL)[6,7]. EGF has both trophic and maturational effects on intestinal mucosal[8,9]. Previous studies suggest an important role for EGF insufficiency in the pathogenesis of NEC. These include decreased salivary and serum EGF levels in premature infants with NEC[10,11], gastrointestinal abnormalities that closely resemble NEC in EGF receptor (EGFR) knockout mice[12] and successful treatment with intravenous EGF of an 8-mo-old child diagnosed with NEC-like symptoms[13]. Moreover, Dvorak et al[14], established that supplementation of enteral formula feedings with EGF dramatically decreases the development and severity of NEC-like injury in the neonatal rat model. These results led us to ask whether reduced EGF might be associated with NEC in human preterm infants.

The aim of the present study was thus to determine the dynamic change of EGF in neo-natal rat with intestine injury, and to define whether NEC is associated with the levels EGF from the mucosa of the affected intestine tissue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animal Model

The experiment was approved by the Second Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University. One-day-old Wistar rats (mean weight, 6.25±0.77 g) were given an intraperitoneally (IP) injection of 4 mg/kg E.coli O55:B5 endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide (LPS); Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo) or similar volume saline[15]. All pups were killed respectively at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after receiving LPS IP and the control pups were killed at 1 h after saline IP. The pups were excluded from the study were those that died before collection of the specimens.

NEC evaluation

After the rats were killed, the gastrointestinal tract was carefully removed, a 2-cm segment of distal ileum 4-cm proximal to the ileocecal valve from each animal was fixed in 4% parafarm, paraffin-embedded, microtome-sectioned at 5 µm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic evaluation of NEC. Lesions were graded by a blinded observer and were assigned a NEC score on a scale of 0-4 as follows: 0 = normal, intact villous epithelium with normal histology; 1 = mild villous edema, with epithelial sloughing confined to the tips of the villi; 2 = mild midvillous necrosis; 3 = moderate midvillous necrosis, with crypts still readily detectable; and 4 = severe necrosis of entire villi with complete absence of epithelial structures[16].

Epidermal growth factor assay

At the time of death, the rest of the ileum from the control and LPS-injected neo-natal rats was rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen for measurements of EGF levels. The ileums were stored at -80 °C until the time of the assays. Levels of EGF in ileum tissue were determined using ABC-ELISA as provided in kit form (Biosource International Inc, Belgium). The instructions of the manufacturer were followed. The protein content in each sample was estimated according to the method of Read et al[17], (the kit from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, China). All samples were run in duplicate by an investigator who was blinded as to LPS-injected or control groups. The results were shown as EGF pg/mg protein of ileum tissue.

Statistical analysis

All the values were expressed as the mean±SE. When P was less than 0.05, the difference was considered statistically significant. Paired-Samples t test was used to check the differences between groups. The degree of correlation was described using the Spearman’s rank-correlation test. Software spss 11.5 For Windows was used in all statistical tests.

RESULTS
Ileal EGF levels

Forty rats (8 per time point) with intestinal injury were entered into the study and eight rats served as control. The levels of EGF were significantly lower in the LPS-injected pups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 h than in the control pups. The concentration of EGF began to decrease to the minimum by 3 h after LPS-injected. No significant difference was noted between the LPS exposure pups at 24 h and the control pups (Table 1).

Table 1 EGF levels of ileum of neonatal rats (n = 8, pg/mg).
Control groupLPS group
1 h3 h6 h12 h24 h
EGF275.6±50.4245.6±49.0a221.4±39.0b223.4±48.1b246.0±46.6b240.8±34.6
Incidence and severity of NEC

Using the histologic scoring system, tissues with histologic scores 2+ or greater were designated positive for NEC. In the LPS-injected group, 50.5% (21/40) showed significant (P<0.01) pathologic changes in ileal structure characterized as moderate (2+), severe (3+), or full necrosis (4+) versus only 0% (0/8) incidence of NEC in the control group. The degree of ileal damage was also significantly (P<0.01) increased in the LPS-injected versus the control group, with a median NEC score of 1.08±0.61, 1.63±0.84, 1.95±0.72, 2.42±0.43, and 2.21±0.53, respectively. The median for NEC damage in control animals was 0.12±0.17. Spearman’s rank correlation analyses showed that lower EGF concentrations correlate with increased severity of NEC (r = -0.547, P<0.01).

DISCUSSION

In the current study, we have measured substantially lower levels of EGF in the ileum tissue with complicated intestinal injury, when compared with a cohort of control rats. These findings offer a potential role for a deficiency of EGF in the initiation or progression of NEC. There was a significant negative relationship between the levels of EGF and the degree of intestinal injury. These results confirm that decreased levels of EGF of the ileum result in a dramatic augment of the incidence and severity of NEC.

NEC is the most common seriously acquired gastrointestinal tract problem in neonatal intensive care units, with reported mortality of 10-30%[18]. Furthermore, the severity of NEC, as per the modified Bell’s classification as well as mortality, seems to be inversely related to birthweight and gestational age, with a report of even 100% mortality in infants with birth-weights less than 1000 g and gestational ages less than 28 wk[19]. The reasons for a predilection for prematurity are unclear, but an immature mucosal barrier and immune response likely contribute to the premature neonates’ susceptibility[14]. EGF is acid-stable and trypsin- resistant, allowing it to survive passage through the gastrointestinal tract and to act directly on the intestinal cells[20]. The predominant effects of EGF on the gastrointestinal tract have been reported and include suppression of gastric acid secretion, gastric cytoprotection; stimulation of intestinal DNA synthesis and cell division; regulation of intestinal brush-border disaccharidase activities; increased water, glucose, and sodium absorption; increased cellular calcium concentration; activation of ion transport and modulation of prostaglandin synthesis and secretion [6,21-23]. These studies suggested that EGF plays an important role in fetal or postnatal intestinal growth and development.

Experimental evidence supports a role for EGF on gut maturation and protection during development; EGF leads to increased growth of the gastric mucosa in neonatal rats, and inactivation of the EGFR in knockout mice results in a hemorrhagic enteritis that is similar to NEC[12,24-26].

The first report relating EGF and intestinal necrosis was reported in England, where an 8-mo-old child with intestinal necrosis similar to NEC, that serial biopsies showed significant increase in crypt cell proliferative activity in association with marked recovery of the surface epithelium, was successfully treated with continuous infusion of EGF[13]. Scott et al[27], have shown significant elevation of urinary EGF levels in neonates at the time of the development of NEC that they suggest might result from increased absorption of EGF through the damaged intestinal mucosal. Furthermore, markedly diminished serum and salivary EGF levels have been reported in premature infants with NEC[10,11]. These studies suggested that administration of exogenous EGF might provide an effective means to prevent or treat this disease. Therefore, supplementation of a higher dose of EGF into milk formula can protect EGF against this inherent proteolytic degradation in the stomach and small intestine and improve the efficiency of injury treatment during the perinatal period of life[14].

The mechanisms underlying the protective effects of EGF in injured mucosal are not clearly understood. However, the involvement of the EGFR in the biological action of EGF has been extensively studied[28]. Various studies in the past have described the appearance of EGFR in the human digestive tract between the 12th and 17th wk of gestation[29-31]. EGFRs are present throughout the gastrointestinal tract on the basolateral membrane, which may be more accessible in the preterm intestine with increased permeability[30,31]. It promotes intestinal growth and stimulates intestinal repair[12,31,32]. The EGFR is activated through phosphorylation by prostaglandin PGE2 producing a large number of downstream events that can stimulate growth-related signal transduction to regulate the cell cycle and enhance cell proliferation[33-36].

Our present study provides, for the first time, the decreased levels of EGF in damaged ileum indicate that offers a potential role for a deficiency of EGF in the initiation or progression of NEC. Moreover, the development of NEC has effect on the endogenous production of EGF in damaged ileum.

In conclusion, the degree of NEC is associated with the decreased levels of EGF that may support the possibility of using exogenous administration of EGF for prophylaxis or treatment of this condition.

Footnotes

Science Editor Li WZ Language Editor Elsevier HK

References
1.  Jilling T, Lu J, Jackson M, Caplan MS. Intestinal epithelial apoptosis initiates gross bowel necrosis in an experimental rat model of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr Res. 2004;55:622-629.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 154]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 164]  [Article Influence: 8.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Kafetzis DA, Skevaki C, Costalos C. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: an overview. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2003;16:349-355.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 100]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 100]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Hsueh W, Caplan MS, Qu XW, Tan XD, De Plaen IG, Gonzalez-Crussi F. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: clinical considerations and pathogenetic concepts. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2003;6:6-23.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 272]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 275]  [Article Influence: 13.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Chan KL, Ho JC, Chan KW, Tam PK. A study of gut immunity to enteral endotoxin in rats of different ages: a possible cause for necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:1435-1440.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Schanler RJ. Overview: the clinical perspective. J Nutr. 2000;130:417S-419S.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Barnard JA, Beauchamp RD, Russell WE, Dubois RN, Coffey RJ. Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their relevance to gastrointestinal pathophysiology. Gastroenterology. 1995;108:564-580.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 240]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 229]  [Article Influence: 7.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Playford RJ, Wright NA. Why is epidermal growth factor present in the gut lumen? Gut. 1996;38:303-305.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 78]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Duh G, Mouri N, Warburton D, Thomas DW. EGF regulates early embryonic mouse gut development in chemically defined organ culture. Pediatr Res. 2000;48:794-802.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Dignass AU. Mechanisms and modulation of intestinal epithelial repair. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2001;7:68-77.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 174]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 175]  [Article Influence: 7.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Helmrath MA, Shin CE, Fox JW, Erwin CR, Warner BW. Epidermal growth factor in saliva and serum of infants with necrotising enterocolitis. Lancet. 1998;351:266-267.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Shin CE, Falcone RA, Stuart L, Erwin CR, Warner BW. Diminished epidermal growth factor levels in infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:173-176; discussion 177.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 79]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 81]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Miettinen PJ, Berger JE, Meneses J, Phung Y, Pedersen RA, Werb Z, Derynck R. Epithelial immaturity and multiorgan failure in mice lacking epidermal growth factor receptor. Nature. 1995;376:337-341.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 742]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 733]  [Article Influence: 25.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Sullivan PB, Brueton MJ, Tabara ZB, Goodlad RA, Lee CY, Wright NA. Epidermal growth factor in necrotising enteritis. Lancet. 1991;338:53-54.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 85]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 82]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Dvorak B, Halpern MD, Holubec H, Williams CS, McWilliam DL, Dominguez JA, Stepankova R, Payne CM, McCuskey RS. Epidermal growth factor reduces the development of necrotizing enterocolitis in a neonatal rat model. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2002;282:G156-G164.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Premer DM, Goertz R, Georgieff MK, Mammel MC, Schwarzenberg SJ. Muscle proteolysis and weight loss in a neonatal rat model of sepsis syndrome. Inflammation. 2002;26:97-101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Hammerman C, Goldschmidt D, Caplan MS, Kaplan M, Bromiker R, Eidelman AI, Gartner LM, Hochman A. Protective effect of bilirubin in ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rat intestine. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;35:344-349.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Read SM, Northcote DH. Minimization of variation in the response to different proteins of the Coomassie blue G dye-binding assay for protein. Anal Biochem. 1981;116:53-64.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1064]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1127]  [Article Influence: 26.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Caplan MS, Jilling T. New concepts in necrotizing enterocolitis. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2001;13:111-115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 137]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 127]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Buch NA, Ahmad SM, Ali SW, Hassan HM. An epidemiological study of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Saudi Med J. 2001;22:231-237.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Britton JR, George-Nascimento C, Udall JN, Koldovský O. Minimal hydrolysis of epidermal growth factor by gastric fluid of preterm infants. Gut. 1989;30:327-332.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Berseth CL. Enhancement of intestinal growth in neonatal rats by epidermal growth factor in milk. Am J Physiol. 1987;253:G662-G665.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  O'Loughlin EV, Chung M, Hollenberg M, Hayden J, Zahavi I, Gall DG. Effect of epidermal growth factor on ontogeny of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Physiol. 1985;249:G674-G678.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Opleta-Madsen K, Meddings JB, Gall DG. Epidermal growth factor and postnatal development of intestinal transport and membrane structure. Pediatr Res. 1991;30:342-350.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Al-Nafussi AI, Wright NA. The effect of epidermal growth factor (EGF) on cell proliferation of the gastrointestinal mucosa in rodents. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol. 1982;40:63-69.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 95]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 94]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Hormi K, Lehy T. Developmental expression of transforming growth factor-alpha and epidermal growth factor receptor proteins in the human pancreas and digestive tract. Cell Tissue Res. 1994;278:439-450.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Jankowski J, Murphy S, Coghill G, Grant A, Wormsley KG, Sanders DS, Kerr M, Hopwood D. Epidermal growth factor receptors in the oesophagus. Gut. 1992;33:439-443.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Scott SM, Rogers C, Angelus P, Backstrom C. Effect of necrotizing enterocolitis on urinary epidermal growth factor levels. Am J Dis Child. 1991;145:804-807.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Chailler P, Ménard D. Ontogeny of EGF receptors in the human gut. Front Biosci. 1999;4:D87-D101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Ménard D, Arsenault P, Pothier P. Biologic effects of epidermal growth factor in human fetal jejunum. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:656-663.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Ménard D, Pothier P. Radioautographic localization of epidermal growth factor receptors in human fetal gut. Gastroenterology. 1991;101:640-649.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Fagbemi AO, Wright N, Lakhoo K, Edwards AD. Immunoreactive epidermal growth factor receptors are present in gastrointestinal epithelial cells of preterm infants with necrotising enterocolitis. Early Hum Dev. 2001;65:1-9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Swaniker F, Guo W, Fonkalsrud EW, Diamond J. The effect of epidermal growth factor on mucosal function after ileal resection. J Surg Res. 1995;58:565-569.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Auwerx J. Nuclear receptors. I. PPAR gamma in the gastrointestinal tract: gain or pain? Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2002;282:G581-G585.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Claud EC, Savidge T, Walker WA. Modulation of human intestinal epithelial cell IL-8 secretion by human milk factors. Pediatr Res. 2003;53:419-425.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 117]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 112]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Walters JR. Cell and molecular biology of the small intestine: new insights into differentiation, growth and repair. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2004;20:70-76.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Chang CJ, Chao JC. Effect of human milk and epidermal growth factor on growth of human intestinal Caco-2 cells. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;34:394-401.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]