Published online Mar 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1867
Revised: September 2, 2004
Accepted: December 1, 2004
Published online: March 28, 2005
AIM: Genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes have recently been shown to affect susceptibility to chemical carcinogenesis. Cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) enzyme catalyzes the metabolism of many procarcinogens, such as N-nitrosamines and related compounds. The gene coding for this enzyme is polymorphic and thus may play a role in gastric cardia cancer (GCC) etiology. In this hospital-based case-control study, we evaluate the relationship between genetic polymorphisms of CYP2E1 and the risk of GCC.
METHODS: The study subjects comprised 159 histologically confirmed GCC cases identified via hospital cancer registry and surgical records at five hospitals in Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China, between April and November 2001. Controls were 192 patients admitted to the same hospitals for nonmalignant conditions. The genotypes of CYP2E1 were detected by a PCR-based RFLP assay. The odds ratios were estimated by logistic regression analyses and were adjusted for potential confounding factors.
RESULTS: The distribution of three genotypes of CYP2E1 in GCC cases and controls was significantly different (χ2 = 16.04, P<0.01). The frequency of the CYP2E1 (c1/c1) genotype in GCC cases and controls was 60.4% and 40.1%, respectively. The CYP2E1 (c1/c1) genotype was associated with an increased risk for GCC (the adjusted (OR) was 2.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.52-3.70). Subjects who carried the CYP2E1 (c1/c1) genotype and were habitual smokers were at a significantly higher risk of developing GCC (OR = 4.68, 95%CI: 2.19-10.04) compared with those who had the CYP2E1 (c1/c2 or c2/c2) genotype and did not smoke.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the CYP2E1 genotype may influence individual susceptibility to development of GCC, and that the risk increases significantly in smokers.
- Citation: Cai L, Zheng ZL, Zhang ZF. Cytochrome p450 2E1 polymorphisms and the risk of gastric cardia cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(12): 1867-1871
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i12/1867.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1867
Gastric cardia cancer (GCC) has shown a rapid increase in incidence in many developed countries in the last 20 years [1-5]. Despite a steady fall in incidence of non-cardia cancer, gastric cancer remains a significant cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide[6,7]. Epidemiological studies have reported that exposure to N-nitrosamines and related compounds may be important factors for gastric carcinogenesis[8-11]. Environmental chemical carcinogens require metabolic activation by host enzymes[12-15]. CYP2E1 is of critical importance in the metabolic activation of many low-molecular-weight carcinogens, including N-nitrosamines[16]. The gene coding for this enzyme is polymorphic and thus may also be involved in this process[17,18]. Several studies described significant associations between CYP2E1 polymorphisms and the incidences of human cancer, e.g., in esophageal cancer[19], lung cancer[20], nasopharyngeal carcinoma[21] and colorectal cancer[22-24]. In contrast, other studies showed no association[25-27]. To date there have been no studies on the relationship of this genotype to GCC risk[28]. We hypothesized that if N-nitroso compounds play a role in GCC, and smoking is a significant source of exposure for these compounds, then the polymorphisms may be associated with this disease and may modify the association of smoking with GCC. In the present study, we evaluated the possible relevance of Cytochrome P4502E1 polymorphisms to GCC.
The cardia cancer group (n = 159) consists of all inpatients who were diagnosed with primary cardia cancer and were identified between April and November of 2001 from five hospitals: First-accessory hospital of Fujian Medical University, Xiehe hospital-affiliated Fujian Medical University, Fujian provincial hospital, Tumor hospital of Fujian province and Zong hospital of Fuzhou. Frequency matched controls (n = 192) were continuously recruited by gender and age (±3 years) during the same period in the same hospitals, and were confirmed to be cancer-free and with no history of cancer. All subjects were ethnic Han Chinese and residents of Fuzhou, Fujian province, China.
In-person interviews were conducted at the hospitals by trained interviewers. A structured questionnaire was composed of items such as general characteristics, personal medical history, family cancer history, smoking and drinking history, and dietary factors. Blood samples were collected from each participant for genotyping.
DNA was extracted from the coagulated blood using DNAzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genotyping for polymorphisms of CYP2E1 (GenBank ID: NM_000773) was detected using the PCR-RFLP technique. PCR products were generated by using 100 ng of genomic DNA in 25 μL volume reactions containing 10 mmol/L Tris–HCL (pH 8.3), 50 mmol/L KCL, 2.0 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L each dNTP, 0.25 μmol/L each outer oligonucleotide primer (forward, 5’-CCAGTCGAGTCT-ACATTGTCA-3’; reverse, 5’-AGACCTCCACATT-GACTAGC-3’) and 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase. The PCR amplification consisted of an initial 5-min incubation at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturing at 94 °C for 30 s and annealing at 58 °C for 30 s, with an extension at 72 °C for 1 min. The reaction was terminated after a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. The PCR-amplified DNA fragments including the polymorphic site were digested with the restriction enzymes PstI at 37 °C overnight, and subjected to electrophoresis on 2.0% agarose gel containing 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide for visualization under UV light[29]. A combination of 435- and 118-bp fragments represented c2/c2 genotype; a combination of 553-, 435- and 118-bp fragments represented c1/c2; only a 553-bp fragment represented c1/c1. To ensure quality control, genotyping was performed with blinding to case-control status.
χ2 were used to evaluate case-control differences in the distribution of genotypes. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios and 95%CI, and were adjusted for potential confounding factors.
The relevant characteristics of the study subjects are shown in Table 1. Eighty-one percent of cases and 72.9% of controls were male. The distribution of age and gender among cases and controls were not statistically different. GCC cases (59.7%) had a higher proportion of low educational level than controls (46.4%). Detailed results for GCC risk factors in this study have been published elsewhere.
Variable | Cases | Controls | P | ||
n | (%) | n | (%) | ||
Age (yr) | |||||
≤59 | 62 | 39.0 | 93 | 48.4 | |
60-69 | 61 | 38.4 | 60 | 31.3 | |
≥70 | 36 | 22.6 | 39 | 20.3 | 0.196 |
Sex | |||||
Female | 30 | 18.9 | 52 | 27.1 | |
Male | 129 | 81.1 | 140 | 72.9 | 0.07 |
Education (yr) | |||||
<12 | 95 | 59.7 | 89 | 46.4 | |
≥12 | 64 | 40.3 | 103 | 53.6 | 0.012 |
The overall genotype frequencies for c1/c2, c2/c2, and c1/c1 of CYP2E1 were 47.58% (157/351), 3.13% (11/351), and 49.29% (173/351), respectively. The frequency of the C1 and C2 alleles in the control group was 68% and 31%, respectively. As shown in Table 2, 60.4% (n = 96) of cases and 40.1% (n = 77) of controls had the c1/c1 genotype. The frequency of the CYP2E1 c1/c1 genotype was significantly different between the GCC cases and the controls (χ2 = 16.04, P<0.01), and the risk for the c1/c1 homozygous subjects to have GCC is three-fold times greater than it is for the c2/c2 homozygous and c1/c2 heterozygous subjects (OR = 2.37, 95%CI: 1.52-3.70).
CYP2E1 | Cases | Controls | OR (95%CI)1 | ||
N | % | N | % | ||
C1/c2 | 57 | 35.8 | 110 | 57.3 | 1 |
C2/c2 | 6 | 3.8 | 5 | 2.6 | |
C1/c1 | 96 | 60.4 | 77 | 40.1 | 2.37 (1.52-3.70) |
Of all subjects, 57.2% (91/159) of cases and 43.8% (84/192) of controls were smokers (OR = 1.58, 95%CI:0.96-2.61). To further explore the relationship of smoking, CYP2E1 polymorphisms and GCC, we performed an analysis of association between smoking and the CYP2E1 genotype, separately in cases and controls. Table 3 presents the joint effects on GCC. The proportion of smokers with the CYP2E1 c1/c1 genotype was significantly higher in patients with GCC (61/159, 38.36%) than in the controls (24/192, 12.50%). The greatly elevated risk associated with smoking was observed in the CYP2E1 c1/c1 genotype group (taking non-smokers with the c1/c2 or c2/c2 genotype as the reference group). Cigarette smoking in subjects with the c1/c1 genotype was associated with a four-fold higher risk (OR = 3.94, 95%CI: 1.60-9.67) compared to their non-smoking counterparts. There was an increasing trend in ORs with the number of cigarettes smoked per day (OR: 2.59 for <20 cigarettes a day; OR: 4.17 for ≥20 cigarettes a day). The strongest association with the GCC risk (OR = 8.44, 95%CI: 2.58-27.59) was observed among individuals carrying the CYP2E1 c1/c1 genotype and having a long history of smoking (≥30 years), even after adjustment for potential confounding factors.
Smoking status | CYP2E1 | Cases | Controls | OR (95%CI)1 | OR (95%CI)2 | ||
n | % | n | % | ||||
Smoking | |||||||
Never | c1/c2 or c2/c2 | 33 | 20.75 | 55 | 28.65 | 1 | 1 |
Ever | C1/c1 | 35 | 22.01 | 53 | 27.60 | 1.05 (0.561.99) | 1.03 (0.522.06) |
Ever | c1/c2 or c2/c2 | 30 | 18.87 | 60 | 31.25 | 0.85 (0.401.78) | 0.91 (0.392.14) |
Ever | C1/c1 | 61 | 38.36 | 24 | 12.50 | 4.68 (2.1910.04) | 3.94 (1.609.67) |
Daily consumed cigarettes | |||||||
1-19 | c1/c2 or c2/c2 | 8 | 5.03 | 15 | 7.81 | 0.81 (0.272.39) | 0.62 (0.182.16) |
1-19 | C1/c1 | 9 | 5.66 | 6 | 3.13 | 2.99 (0.8810.19) | 2.59 (0.5412.45) |
≥20 | c1/c2 or c2/c2 | 22 | 13.84 | 45 | 23.44 | 0.90 (0.411.98) | 1.04 (0.412.67) |
≥20 | C1/c1 | 52 | 32.70 | 18 | 9.38 | 5.34 (2.3811.95) | 4.17 (1.6310.63) |
Smoking duration (yr) | |||||||
1-29 | c1/c2 or c2/c2 | 10 | 6.29 | 25 | 13.02 | 0.71 (0.271.87) | 0.82 (0.272.49) |
1-29 | C1/c1 | 19 | 11.95 | 18 | 9.38 | 2.10 (0.855.21) | 1.99 (0.616.49) |
≥30 | c1/c2 or c2/c2 | 20 | 12.58 | 35 | 18.23 | 1.10 (0.472.57) | 1.00 (0.372.69) |
≥30 | C1/c1 | 42 | 26.42 | 6 | 3.13 | 13.32 (4.5039.45) | 8.44 (2.5827.59) |
Gastric cancer is a common cancer in China as well as the rest of the world. Epidemiological studies have shown an association between nitrosamine exposure and increased risk of gastric cancer[30]. Besides diet, exogenous exposure to nitrosamines can occur through use of tobacco products [31,32]. Recently, several studies have found a higher relative risk of smoking for GCC[33-35]. A new prospective study found that the relative risk of current smokers was 2.4 for cardia cancer and 1.7 for all sites[36,37]. In our previous report, we found an elevated risk of gastric cancer with smoking habit, more distinct with the GCC than non-GCC.
Gastric carcinogenesis is a multistep process in which genetic and environmental factors interact in the development of cancer. Interindividual genetic differences in susceptibility to chemical carcinogens are among the most important host factors in human cancer[38-40].
It has been proposed that various host factors affect susceptibility to cancer, even following the same exposure to environmental carcinogenic factors[41-43]. CYP2E1 is one of the main enzymes for bioactivation of tobacco-related substances, and its polymorphisms may be associated with or be risk factors for various forms of cancers[44-46].
Our present data demonstrate that individuals carrying the CYP2E1 c1/c1 genotype were at increased risk for GCC. Moreover, subjects who carry this genotype and have a history of heavy cigarette smoking were at markedly greater increased risk (more than four-fold) for GCC. These results suggested that the interaction of the CYP2E1 polymorphism with smoking has a great influence on susceptibility to GCC. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the association of CYP2E1 polymorphisms with GCC.
The development of GCC may be associated with N-nitroso compound exposures. Tobacco smoke contains hundreds of known and probable human carcinogens[47]. Specific chemicals in tobacco smoke include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), N-nitrosamines, aromatic amines and others[48,49]. A critical review summarizing data for tobacco constituents proposed that tobacco-specific nitrosamines and PAHs are classes of compounds that mostly affect human cancer risk[50,51]. Nitrosamines require metabolic activation by cytochrome P450 enzymes before they bind to DNA, initiating the carcinogenic process[52]. Evidence exists that carcinogen-DNA adduct levels are affected by genetic predispositions. Studies indicate that carcinogen-DNA adducts are related to cancer risk[53]. Smoking-related DNA adducts have been detected in human gastric cancer of smokers. CYP2E1 is a key-activating enzyme because it catalyzes the α-hydroxylation of many nitrosamines. Its activity shows significant interindividual variation, due in part to inherited alterations of the structural gene[54].
The frequency of the c1/c1 genotype among controls in this study is similar to previously published estimates in Chinese populations. Tan et al[55], studied 150 cases with esophageal cancer, 146 cases with esophageal dysplasia, and 150 normal controls in Linxian, China and found that the distribution of CYP2E1 c1/c1 allele frequency was significantly different between controls (44.0%) and cases with cancer (71.3%) or cases with dysplasia (70.6%).
In conclusion, the present case-control study suggested that the individuals carrying the CYP2E1 c1/c1 genotype have a higher risk for GCC. The CYP2E1 c1/c1 genotype is considered as one of the possible susceptibility genes, and the risk increases significantly in smokers. Because of the limited number of subjects, this study does not have appropriate power to detect the interaction between smoking and other factors. Further studies are required to clarify the relationship between CYP2E1 and GCC susceptibility.
We are grateful to all patients who kindly agreed to participate in this study and the physicians and clinical staff for their collaboration.
Science Editor Li WZ Language Editor Elsevier HK
1. | Nguyen AM, Luke CG, Roder D. Comparative epidemiological characteristics of oesophageal adenocarcinoma and other cancers of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2003;4:225-231. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
2. | Bareiss D, Stabenow R, Müller R, Eisinger B, Stegmaier C, Däubler P, Zeitz M, Scherübl H. Current epidemiology of carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia in Germany. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2002;127:1367-1374. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
3. | Blaser MJ, Saito D. Trends in reported adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in Japan. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14:107-113. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 64] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69] [Article Influence: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Kocher HM, Linklater K, Patel S, Ellul JP. Epidemiological study of oesophageal and gastric cancer in south-east England. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1249-1257. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 37] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Botterweck AA, Schouten LJ, Volovics A, Dorant E, van Den Brandt PA. Trends in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in ten European countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29:645-654. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 389] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 412] [Article Influence: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Roder DM. The epidemiology of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2002;5 Suppl 1:5-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 240] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 261] [Article Influence: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Torrado J, Santisteban A, Ruiz-Ederra J. Genetic susceptibility to gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48:1544-1547. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
8. | Correa P, Piazuelo MB, Camargo MC. The future of gastric cancer prevention. Gastric Cancer. 2004;7:9-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 111] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 106] [Article Influence: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Yamashita S, Nomoto T, Abe M, Tatematsu M, Sugimura T, Ushijima T. Persistence of gene expression changes in stomach mucosae induced by short-term N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine treatment and their presence in stomach cancers. Mutat Res. 2004;549:185-193. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Abe M, Yamashita S, Kuramoto T, Hirayama Y, Tsukamoto T, Ohta T, Tatematsu M, Ohki M, Takato T, Sugimura T. Global expression analysis of N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine-induced rat stomach carcinomas using oligonucleotide microarrays. Carcinogenesis. 2003;24:861-867. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Viani F, Siegrist HH, Pignatelli B, Cederberg C, Idström JP, Verdu EF, Fried M, Blum AL, Armstrong D. The effect of intra-gastric acidity and flora on the concentration of N-nitroso compounds in the stomach. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12:165-173. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Sasaki M, Tanaka Y, Okino ST, Nomoto M, Yonezawa S, Nakagawa M, Fujimoto S, Sakuragi N, Dahiya R. Polymorphisms of the CYP1B1 gene as risk factors for human renal cell cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:2015-2019. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 35] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Thier R, Brüning T, Roos PH, Rihs HP, Golka K, Ko Y, Bolt HM. Markers of genetic susceptibility in human environmental hygiene and toxicology: the role of selected CYP, NAT and GST genes. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2003;206:149-171. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 129] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 137] [Article Influence: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Schoket B, Papp G, Lévay K, Mracková G, Kadlubar FF, Vincze I. Impact of metabolic genotypes on levels of biomarkers of genotoxic exposure. Mutat Res. 2001;482:57-69. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 52] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Williams JA. Single nucleotide polymorphisms, metabolic activation and environmental carcinogenesis: why molecular epidemiologists should think about enzyme expression. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22:209-214. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 46] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Bolt HM, Roos PH, Thier R. The cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme CYP2E1 in the biological processing of industrial chemicals: consequences for occupational and environmental medicine. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2003;76:174-185. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
17. | Lucas D, Ferrara R, Gonzales E, Albores A, Manno M, Berthou F. Cytochrome CYP2E1 phenotyping and genotyping in the evaluation of health risks from exposure to polluted environments. Toxicol Lett. 2001;124:71-81. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Chen SY, Liu TY, Shun CT, Wu MS, Lu TH, Lin JT, Sheu JC, Santella RM, Chen CJ. Modification effects of GSTM1, GSTT1 and CYP2E1 polymorphisms on associations between raw salted food and incomplete intestinal metaplasia in a high-risk area of stomach cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;108:606-612. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Xing D, Tan W, Lin D. Genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to esophageal cancer among Chinese population (review). Oncol Rep. 2003;10:1615-1623. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
20. | Li Z, Tan W, Shao K. Susceptibility to lung cancer in Chinese is associated with genetic polymorphism in cytochrome P4502E1. Zhonghua ZhongLiu ZaZhi. 2000;22:5-7. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
21. | Hildesheim A, Anderson LM, Chen CJ, Cheng YJ, Brinton LA, Daly AK, Reed CD, Chen IH, Caporaso NE, Hsu MM. CYP2E1 genetic polymorphisms and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:1207-1212. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 140] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 128] [Article Influence: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
22. | Kiss I, Sándor J, Pajkos G, Bogner B, Hegedüs G, Ember I. Colorectal cancer risk in relation to genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P450 1A1, 2E1, and glutathione-S-transferase M1 enzymes. Anticancer Res. 2000;20:519-522. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
23. | Le Marchand L, Donlon T, Seifried A, Wilkens LR. Red meat intake, CYP2E1 genetic polymorphisms, and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:1019-1024. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
24. | Itoga S, Nomura F, Makino Y, Tomonaga T, Shimada H, Ochiai T, Iizasa T, Baba M, Fujisawa T, Harada S. Tandem repeat polymorphism of the CYP2E1 gene: an association study with esophageal cancer and lung cancer. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002;26:15S-19S. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
25. | Wong NA, Rae F, Simpson KJ, Murray GD, Harrison DJ. Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome p4502E1 and susceptibility to alcoholic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma in a white population: a study and literature review, including meta-analysis. Mol Pathol. 2000;53:88-93. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 64] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
26. | Murata M, Watanabe M, Yamanaka M, Kubota Y, Ito H, Nagao M, Katoh T, Kamataki T, Kawamura J, Yatani R. Genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2E1, glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1 and GSTT1 and susceptibility to prostate cancer in the Japanese population. Cancer Lett. 2001;165:171-177. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 105] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 111] [Article Influence: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
27. | Kim JW, Lee CG, Park YG, Kim KS, Kim IK, Sohn YW, Min HK, Lee JM, Namkoong SE. Combined analysis of germline polymorphisms of p53, GSTM1, GSTT1, CYP1A1, and CYP2E1: relation to the incidence rate of cervical carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:2082-2091. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
28. | El-Serag HB, Mason AC, Petersen N, Key CR. Epidemiological differences between adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia in the USA. Gut. 2002;50:368-372. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 189] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 194] [Article Influence: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
29. | Kato S, Shields PG, Caporaso NE, Hoover RN, Trump BF, Sugimura H, Weston A, Harris CC. Cytochrome P450IIE1 genetic polymorphisms, racial variation, and lung cancer risk. Cancer Res. 1992;52:6712-6715. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
30. | Kelley JR, Duggan JM. Gastric cancer epidemiology and risk factors. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1-9. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 496] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 502] [Article Influence: 23.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
31. | Kubo A, Corley DA. Marked regional variation in adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and the gastric cardia in the United States. Cancer. 2002;95:2096-2102. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 83] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 83] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
32. | Engel LS, Vaughan TL, Gammon MD, Chow WH, Risch HA, Dubrow R, Mayne ST, Rotterdam H, Schoenberg JB, Stanford JL. Occupation and risk of esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Am J Ind Med. 2002;42:11-22. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
33. | Engel LS, Chow WH, Vaughan TL, Gammon MD, Risch HA, Stanford JL, Schoenberg JB, Mayne ST, Dubrow R, Rotterdam H. Population attributable risks of esophageal and gastric cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1404-1413. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 541] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 502] [Article Influence: 23.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
34. | Terry MB, Gaudet MM, Gammon MD. The epidemiology of gastric cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2002;12:111-127. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 124] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 123] [Article Influence: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
35. | Chao A, Thun MJ, Henley SJ, Jacobs EJ, McCullough ML, Calle EE. Cigarette smoking, use of other tobacco products and stomach cancer mortality in US adults: The Cancer Prevention Study II. Int J Cancer. 2002;101:380-389. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 105] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 107] [Article Influence: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
36. | González CA, Pera G, Agudo A, Palli D, Krogh V, Vineis P, Tumino R, Panico S, Berglund G, Simán H. Smoking and the risk of gastric cancer in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Int J Cancer. 2003;107:629-634. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 158] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 159] [Article Influence: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
37. | Sasazuki S, Sasaki S, Tsugane S. Cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and subsequent gastric cancer risk by subsite and histologic type. Int J Cancer. 2002;101:560-566. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 115] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 114] [Article Influence: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
38. | Glatt HR. An overview of bioactivation of chemical carcinogens. Biochem Soc Trans. 2000;28:1-6. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
39. | Indulski JA, Lutz W. Metabolic genotype in relation to individual susceptibility to environmental carcinogens. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2000;73:71-85. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 36] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
40. | Cai L, Yu SZ, Zhang ZF. Glutathione S-transferases M1, T1 genotypes and the risk of gastric cancer: a case-control study. World J Gastroenterol. 2001;7:506-509. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
41. | Augenlicht LH, Heerdt BG, Mariadason JM, Yang W, Wilson AJ, Fragale A, Velcich A. Environment-gene interactions in intestinal cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2002;11 Suppl 2:S12-S17. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
42. | Malats N. Gene-environment interactions in pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2001;1:472-476. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
43. | Kiyohara C. Genetic polymorphism of enzymes involved in xenobiotic metabolism and the risk of colorectal cancer. J Epidemiol. 2000;10:349-360. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 54] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 55] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
44. | Agundez JA. Cytochrome P450 gene polymorphism and cancer. Curr Drug Metab. 2004;5:211-224. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 208] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 213] [Article Influence: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
45. | Neuhaus T, Ko YD, Lorenzen K, Fronhoffs S, Harth V, Bröde P, Vetter H, Bolt HM, Pesch B, Brüning T. Association of cytochrome P450 2E1 polymorphisms and head and neck squamous cell cancer. Toxicol Lett. 2004;151:273-282. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
46. | Munaka M, Kohshi K, Kawamoto T, Takasawa S, Nagata N, Itoh H, Oda S, Katoh T. Genetic polymorphisms of tobacco- and alcohol-related metabolizing enzymes and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2003;129:355-360. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 94] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 103] [Article Influence: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
47. | Mizoue T, Tokui N, Nishisaka K, Nishisaka S, Ogimoto I, Ikeda M, Yoshimura T. Prospective study on the relation of cigarette smoking with cancer of the liver and stomach in an endemic region. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29:232-237. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 61] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 66] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
48. | Kikuchi S, Kurosawa M, Sakiyama T, Tenjin H. Long-term effect of smoking on serum pepsinogen values. J Epidemiol. 2002;12:351-356. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
49. | Hecht SS, Carmella SG, Chen M, Dor Koch JF, Miller AT, Murphy SE, Jensen JA, Zimmerman CL, Hatsukami DK. Quantitation of urinary metabolites of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen after smoking cessation. Cancer Res. 1999;59:590-596. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
50. | Hecht SS. Tobacco smoke carcinogens and lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1194-1210. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1338] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1277] [Article Influence: 51.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
51. | Hecht SS. DNA adduct formation from tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines. Mutat Res. 1999;424:127-142. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 275] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 251] [Article Influence: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
52. | Mori Y, Koide A, Kobayashi Y, Morimura K, Kaneko M, Fukushima S. Effect of ethanol treatment on metabolic activation and detoxification of esophagus carcinogenic N-nitrosamines in rat liver. Mutagenesis. 2002;17:251-256. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
53. | Godschalk R, Nair J, van Schooten FJ, Risch A, Drings P, Kayser K, Dienemann H, Bartsch H. Comparison of multiple DNA adduct types in tumor adjacent human lung tissue: effect of cigarette smoking. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:2081-2086. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 78] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 79] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
54. | Yoshimura K, Hanaoka T, Ohnami S, Ohnami S, Kohno T, Liu Y, Yoshida T, Sakamoto H, Tsugane S. Allele frequencies of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 40 candidate genes for gene-environment studies on cancer: data from population-based Japanese random samples. J Hum Genet. 2003;48:654-658. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 65] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 71] [Article Influence: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
55. | Tan W, Song N, Wang GQ, Liu Q, Tang HJ, Kadlubar FF, Lin DX. Impact of genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 2E1 and glutathione S-transferases M1, T1, and P1 on susceptibility to esophageal cancer among high-risk individuals in China. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:551-556. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |