Brief Reports Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. May 1, 2004; 10(9): 1375-1378
Published online May 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i9.1375
Protective effect of doxorubicin induced heat shock protein 72 on cold preservation injury of rat livers
Hao Chen, Xia-Xing Deng, Wei-Ping Yang, Cheng-Hong Peng, Hong-Wei Li, Department of Surgery and Center of Organ Transplantation, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai 200025, China
Ying-Yan Yu, Jun Ji, Center of Organ Transplantation, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai 200025, China
Ming-Jun Zhang, Animal Laboratory, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai 200025, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Hao Chen, Department of Surgery and Center of Organ Transplantation, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai 200025, China. chenhaodr@sohu.com
Telephone: +86-21-64370045 Fax: +86-21-64333548
Received: August 26, 2003
Revised: October 1, 2003
Accepted: October 22, 2003
Published online: May 1, 2004

Abstract

AIM: To observe the protective effect of heat shock protein 72 (HSP 72) induced by pretreatment of doxorubicin (DXR) on long-term cold preservation injury of rat livers.

METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were administered intravenously DXR at a dose of 1 mg/kg body mass in DXR group and saline in control group. After 48 h, the rat liver was perfused with cold Linger’s and University of Wisconsin (UW) solutions and then was preserved in UW solution at 4 °C for 24, 36 and 48 h. AST, ALT, LDH and hyaluronic acid in preservative solution were determined. Routine HE, immunohistochemical staining for HSP 72 and electron microscopic examination of hepatic tissues were performed.

RESULTS: After 24, 36 and 48 h, the levels of AST, ALT and hyaluronic acid in preservative solution were significantly higher in control group than in DXR group (P < 0.05), while LDH level was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Hepatic tissues in DXR group were morphologically normal and significantly injured in control group. HSP 72 was expressed in hepatocytes and sinusoidal endothelial cells in DXR group but not in control group.

CONCLUSION: Pretreatment of DXR may extend the time of rat liver cold preservation and keep liver alive. The expression of HSP 72 in liver can prevent hepatocytes and sinusoidal endothelial cells from long-term cold preservation injury.




INTRODUCTION

The term of organ preservation has been extended enormously since Belzer invented University of Wisconsin (UW) solution in 1988[1]. In liver transplantation, the use of UW solution doubles the time of liver cold preservation compared with the use of Euro-Collins solution. But hepatic cold preservation reperfusion injury remains the important reason for the failure of liver transplantation[2-5]. It was reported that cold preservation reperfusion injury in liver, kidney and lung could be prevented by the expression of heat shock protein, which was induced by heat shock reaction (HSR)[6-8]. Kume et al[9] reported that doxorubicin (DXR) could induce HSR, which attenuated hepatic warm ischemia reperfusion injury. DXR is a kind of cytotoxic agent and may induce HSR[10]. Being administered intravenously, DXR was accumulated and metabolized in liver. As a result, semiquinone free radicals were produced, which could induce stress oxidative reaction and expression of HSP 72[11]. Hela cells and cardiac cells could express HSP 72 by pretreatment of DXR in vitro in experiments[12,13]. The aim of this study was to observe the protective effect of HSR induced by DXR on long-term hepatic cold preservation injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Reagents

Doxorubicin was purchased from Shenzhen Main Luck Pharmaceuticals. Inc., China-Merian Corp., Japan. University of Wisconsin solution was purchased from Dupan Co., United States. HA RIA kit was purchased from Shanghai Ocean Research Biomedical Technology Center, China. Monoclonal antibody of HSP 72 was purchased from Oncogene Co. DAKO EnvisionTM kit was from Dako Co.

Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 200-300 g were purchased from Sino-British Sippr/BK Lab Animal Ltd. All rats were kept in animal quarters with controlled temperature (18 °C-25 °C) and light (light on from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.) and were fed with a standard laboratory chow and water in accordance with institutional animal care policies. Prior to the experimental procedure, the rats were fasted for 12 hours but allowed free access to water.

Experimental design

Thirty-six rats were randomly assigned into DXR group and control group. The rats in DXR group were injected intravenously DXR at a dose of 1 mg/kg body mass 48 h before the operation[9], while those in control group were treated with 1 mL normal saline (NS). After being cold perfused orthotopically, the livers were preserved in UW solution for 24, 36 and 48 h.

Liver procurement and cold storage

Rat orthotopic liver cold perfusion was used according to the method described by Kamada and Calne[14]. Under ether anesthesia, 2 mL of heparinized saline solution (250 units/mL) was injected intravenously. Laparotomy was performed via a midline incision. After the abdominal aorta was cannulated with a 14-gauge angiocatheter, the liver was flushed with 10 mL of Linger’s solution at 4 °C. Simultaneously, the supra and infrahepatic vena cava were cut to enhance flushing of the liver. Then, 5 mL of Linger’s solution, followed by 10 mL of UW solution at 4 °C was progressively injected into portal vein. Finally the liver was excised and preserved in 40 mL of UW solution at 4 °C.

Hepatic enzyme assays of preservative solution

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and lactic dehydrogenase level (LDH) in the preservative solutions, collected at 24, 36 and 48 h after cold preservation, were determined by a standard biochemistry autoanalyzer (Backman DU 640).

Assessment of hyaluronic acid of preservative solution

Hyaluronic acid (HA) in the preservative solutions collected at 24, 36 and 48 h after cold preservation was determined using a HA RIA kit according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

Histology and immunohistochemical analysis for HSP 72

The liver specimens collected at 24, 36 and 48 h after cold preservation were fixed in buffered 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections (4-μm thick) were stained with hematoxylin-eosin.

Immunohistochemical analysis was performed by using a mouse anti-HSP 72 monoclonal antibody at a dilution of 1:100, and rabbit anti-mouse IgG as a secondary antibody. Then the specimens were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin complex. Diaminobenzidine was used as the substrate. The specimens were counterstained with hematoxylin. All specimens were examined under an optical microscope (Olympus BX51).

Transmission electron microscopical analysis

Liver fragments of approximately 1 mm×1 mm×2 mm were fixed in 20 g/L glutaraldehyde at 4. After washed in phosphate buffer solution, fragments were postfixed with 10 g/L osmium tetroxide, dehydrated in graded alcohols, replaced in epoxy ethane and stained with uranyl acetate. All specimens were examined under an electron microscope (Hitachi 500).

Statistical analysis

Values are expressed as mean ± SE. Intragroup analysis was performed by paired Student’s t test. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS
ALT, AST and LDH level

ALT and AST levels were significantly higher in control group after preservation for 24, 36 and 48 h than in DXR group (P < 0.05), but LDH level was not different between the 2 groups (P > 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of ALT, AST and LDH levels between two groups.
GroupnTerm of storageALT (IU/L)AST (IU/L)LDH (IU/L)
Control624 h337.3 ± 163.4b417.2 ± 247.5a3369.1 ± 851.9c
636 h589.8 ± 237.3a744.5 ± 317.6 a3623.2 ± 907.1c
648 h713.3 ± 191.8a1160.2 ± 321.3 a3771.7 ± 733.5c
DXR624 h140.5 ± 58.5148.8 ± 110.63162.5 ± 1442
636 h347.3 ± 89340.5 ± 139.43468.7 ± 815.7
648 h406.0 ± 79733.3 ± 394.43549.8 ± 894.1
HA level

HA level was significantly higher in control group after preservation for 24, 36 and 48 h than in DXR group (P < 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of hyaluronic acid levels between two groups.
GroupnTerm of storageHA (ng/mL)
Control624 h43.1±17.0a
636 h91.2±19.8b
648 h143.7±23.2a
DXR624 h26.2±6.0
636 h44.2±7.8
648 h90.2±13.5
Histology and immunohistochemistry for HSP 72

After cold storage for 24 to 48 h, hepatocytes in control group were swelling, ballooning, vacuolizing and partly autolyzing while the majority of sinusoidal endothelial cells (SECs) also became swollen, rounded and detached from basement membrane and hepatic sinusoids were narrowed. In DXR group, hepatocytes remained normal and few SECs appeared swollen, rounded or detached.

After cold storage for 24 to 48 h, some hepatocytes and SECs expressed HSP 72 in DXR group but not in control group.

Transmission electron microscopical analysis

After cold storage for 24 to 48 h, hepatocytes in control group showed swollen mitochondria, fatty dots, and while cellular swelling, rounding, detachment from the matrix and nuclear condensation were seen in part of SECs. In DXR group, hepatocytes remained normal and few SECs appeared swollen, rounded or detached.

DISCUSSION

The use of University of Wisconsin solution extended the time of organ cold preservation to 24 h in theory[15]. UW solution was designed to attenuate cell swelling, inhibit reactive oxygen intermediates (ROIs), offer substrates for synthesizing adenosine triphosphates (ATP) and prevent cells from absorbing ions of sodium and calcium[16,17]. But in the course of cold storage, cells remained to be injured in different degrees with the extension of preservation time. In the period of liver cold storage, hepatocytes and SECs were all injured, especially the latter[18,19].

During warm ischemia hepatocytes were the most vulnerable cells whereas SECs were less sensitive[20]. But hepatocytes were less damaged during cold preservation[21]. However, along with the extension of the time of cold storage, hepatocytes were also injured in different degrees. The mechanisms underlying hepatocyte injury during hypothermia storage were intracellular acidosis due to anaerobic glycolysis and lactate accumulation, drawback of protein synthesis and exhaustion of hepatin and ATP which lessen the ability to resist rewarm ischemia and reperfusion damage[21]. In morphology, changes of hepatocytes included swelling, ballooning and vacuolization. Although little loss of cell viability occurred after 24 h of storage in UW solution, the cellular functions were already injured[22]. In this study, histological results showed that hepatocytes were apparently damaged in control group after cold storage for 36 to 48 h. In contrast, the shapes of hepatocytes were normal in DXR group. In preservation solution, ALT and AST levels in DXR group were significantly lower than in control group (P < 0.05). These data indicated that pretreatment with DXR could evidently protect hepatocytes.

During hepatic cold ischemia, SECs were most susceptible to hypothermia injury. Injuries of SECs were due to angiogenic factors and proteases, resulting in digestion of fibronectin, a key molecule linking collagen to the sinusoidal lining cell membrane integrin[23]. In morphology, SECs became rounded, detached, and sloughed into the sinusoidal lumen[24-26]. These changes were more distinct along with the prolongation of cold storage[27]. But little loss of viability of SECs occurred after 24 h of storage in UW solution[28]. This study indicated that SECs in both groups were injured after 24 to 48 h of cold storage in UW solution, but the degree of injury was significantly attenuated in DXR group than in control group. The shape of SECs was normal after 24 h and a small quantity of SECs became rounded, and detached after 36 to 48 h in DXR group. But in control group, SECs were obviously rounded and detached after 24 h, and the morphological changes became more significant after 36 to 48 h. On the other hand, hyaluronic acid level was significantly higher in control group than in DXR group (P < 0.05). Hyaluronic acid is a high-molecular-weight polysaccharide that could be rapidly and specifically degraded by SEC[29]. Hyaluronic acid level was a sensitive index of SECs’ injury[30]. These results showed that pretreatment with DXR could protect SECs.

Cold storage of livers for more than 12 to 18 h carried the risk for graft failure[31-34] and post-transplantation infection[35]. In recent years, preconditioning has been used to prolong hepatic cold ischemia[6,36-38]. The liver graft was subjected to an acute sublethal stress and this preconditioning could offer resistance to subsequent lethal injury by inducing the expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs). One of the important functions of HSPs was to protect cells and organs from a wide variety of damages such as hypothermia, ischemia, and ROIs[39-41]. Cheng et al[42] reported that pretreated by Zinc and heat shock, the expression of HSP 72 was markedly elevated after rat livers were stored in UW solution for 24 h. It was also reported that rat kidneys were preserved well successively for 45 h in cold UW solution[43]. In our study, the protective effect of pretreatment of DXR on hepatic long-term cold storage injury might be attributed to induction of HSR and expression of HSP 72 in rat livers. HSR induced by DXR extended the time of hepatic cold storage to 48 h while morphological shape and functions of both hepatocytes and SECs remained commendable. The expressions of HSP 72 in hepatocytes and SECs were confirmed by immunohistochemical staining. It was clear that induction of HSP 72 in advance could make rat livers enter into stress state ahead of schedule and endure long-term cold ischemia injury afterwards.

In conclusion, these results demonstrate that pretreatment with doxorubicin could induce the expression of HSP 72 in rat livers. Thus pharmacological induction of HSR may be a successful method to prevent liver from long-term hypothermia preservation injury.

Footnotes

Edited by Zhu LH, Wang XL Proofread by Xu FM

References
1.  Belzer FO, Kalayoglu M, D'Alessandro AM, Pirsch JD, Sollinger HW, Hoffmann R, Boudjema K, Southard JH. Organ preservation: experience with University of Wisconsin solution and plans for the future. Clin Transplant. 1990;4:73-77.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Bilzer M, Gerbes AL. Preservation injury of the liver: mechanisms and novel therapeutic strategies. J Hepatol. 2000;32:508-515.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Jaeschke H. Molecular mechanisms of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury and preconditioning. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003;284:G15-G26.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Serracino-Inglott F, Habib NA, Mathie RT. Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Surg. 2001;181:160-166.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Kang KJ. Mechanism of hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury and protection against reperfusion injury. Transplant Proc. 2002;34:2659-2661.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Redaelli CA, Tian YH, Schaffner T, Ledermann M, Baer HU, Dufour JF. Extended preservation of rat liver graft by induction of heme oxygenase-1. Hepatology. 2002;35:1082-1092.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Wagner M, Cadetg P, Ruf R, Mazzucchelli L, Ferrari P, Redaelli CA. Heme oxygenase-1 attenuates ischemia/reperfusion-induced apoptosis and improves survival in rat renal allografts. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1564-1573.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Hiratsuka M, Yano M, Mora BN, Nagahiro I, Cooper JD, Patterson GA. Heat shock pretreatment protects pulmonary isografts from subsequent ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1998;17:1238-1246.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Kume M, Yamamoto Y, Yamagami K, Ishikawa Y, Uchinami H, Yamaoka Y. Pharmacological hepatic preconditioning: involvement of 70-kDa heat shock proteins (HSP72 and HSP73) in ischaemic tolerance after intravenous administration of doxorubicin. Br J Surg. 2000;87:1168-1175.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Yee SB, Pritsos CA. Comparison of oxygen radical generation from the reductive activation of doxorubicin, streptonigrin, and menadione by xanthine oxidase and xanthine dehydrogenase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1997;347:235-241.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Trost LC, Wallace KB. Stimulation of myoglobin-dependent lipid peroxidation by adriamycin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;204:23-29.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Lee EK, Regenold WT, Shapiro P. Inhibition of aldose reductase enhances HeLa cell sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs and involves activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases. Anticancer Drugs. 2002;13:859-868.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Huber SA. Heat-shock protein induction in adriamycin and picornavirus-infected cardiocytes. Lab Invest. 1992;67:218-224.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Kamada N, Calne RY, Wight DG, Lines JG. Orthotopic rat liver transplantation after long-term preservation by continuous perfusion with fluorocarbon emulsion. Transplantation. 1980;30:43-48.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Belzer FO, Southard JH. Principles of solid-organ preservation by cold storage. Transplantation. 1988;45:673-676.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Lemasters JJ, Thurman RG. Reperfusion injury after liver preservation for transplantation. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1997;37:327-338.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Southard JH, van Gulik TM, Ametani MS, Vreugdenhil PK, Lindell SL, Pienaar BL, Belzer FO. Important components of the UW solution. Transplantation. 1990;49:251-257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Urata K, Nguyen B, Brault A, Lavoie J, Rocheleau B, Huet PM. Decreased survival in rat liver transplantation with extended cold preservation: role of portal vein clamping time. Hepatology. 1998;28:366-373.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Otto G, Wolff H, David H. Preservation damage in liver transplantation: electron-microscopic findings. Transplant Proc. 1984;16:1247-1248.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Noack K, Bronk SF, Kato A, Gores GJ. The greater vulnerability of bile duct cells to reoxygenation injury than to anoxia. Implications for the pathogenesis of biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Transplantation. 1993;56:495-500.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Clavien PA, Harvey PR, Strasberg SM. Preservation and reperfusion injuries in liver allografts. An overview and synthesis of current studies. Transplantation. 1992;53:957-978.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Lichtman SN, Lemasters JJ. Role of cytokines and cytokine-producing cells in reperfusion injury to the liver. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19:171-187.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Upadhya AG, Harvey RP, Howard TK, Lowell JA, Shenoy S, Strasberg SM. Evidence of a role for matrix metalloproteinases in cold preservation injury of the liver in humans and in the rat. Hepatology. 1997;26:922-928.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  McKeown CM, Edwards V, Phillips MJ, Harvey PR, Petrunka CN, Strasberg SM. Sinusoidal lining cell damage: the critical injury in cold preservation of liver allografts in the rat. Transplantation. 1988;46:178-191.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Hansen TN, Dawson PE, Brockbank KG. Effects of hypothermia upon endothelial cells: mechanisms and clinical importance. Cryobiology. 1994;31:101-106.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Marsh DC, Lindell SL, Fox LE, Belzer FO, Southard JH. Hypothermic preservation of hepatocytes. I. Role of cell swelling. Cryobiology. 1989;26:524-534.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Fratte S, Gendrault JL, Steffan AM, Kirn A. Comparative ultra-structural study of rat livers preserved in Euro-Collins or University of Wisconsin solution. Hepatology. 1991;13:1173-1180.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Clavien PA. Sinusoidal endothelial cell injury during hepatic preservation and reperfusion. Hepatology. 1998;28:281-285.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Laurent TC, Fraser JR, Pertoft H, Smedsrød B. Binding of hyaluronate and chondroitin sulphate to liver endothelial cells. Biochem J. 1986;234:653-658.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Reinders ME, van Wagensveld BA, van Gulik TM, Frederiks WM, Chamuleau RA, Endert E, Klopper PJ. Hyaluronic acid uptake in the assessment of sinusoidal endothelial cell damage after cold storage and normothermic reperfusion of rat livers. Transpl Int. 1996;9:446-453.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
31.  Figueras J, Busquets J, Grande L, Jaurrieta E, Perez-Ferreiroa J, Mir J, Margarit C, Lopez P, Vazquez J, Casanova D. The deleterious effect of donor high plasma sodium and extended preservation in liver transplantation. A multivariate analysis. Transplantation. 1996;61:410-413.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  Ploeg RJ, D'Alessandro AM, Knechtle SJ, Stegall MD, Pirsch JD, Hoffmann RM, Sasaki T, Sollinger HW, Belzer FO, Kalayoglu M. Risk factors for primary dysfunction after liver transplantation--a multivariate analysis. Transplantation. 1993;55:807-813.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Furukawa H, Todo S, Imventarza O, Casavilla A, Wu YM, Scotti-Foglieni C, Broznick B, Bryant J, Day R, Starzl TE. Effect of cold ischemia time on the early outcome of human hepatic allografts preserved with UW solution. Transplantation. 1991;51:1000-1004.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Adam R, Bismuth H, Diamond T, Ducot B, Morino M, Astarcioglu I, Johann M, Azoulay D, Chiche L, Bao YM. Effect of extended cold ischaemia with UW solution on graft function after liver transplantation. Lancet. 1992;340:1373-1376.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Nuño J, Cuervas-Mons V, Vicente E, Turrión V, Pereira F, Mora NP, Barrios C, Millán I, Ardaiz J. Prolonged graft cold ischemia: a risk factor for early bacterial and fungal infection in liver transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 1995;27:2323-2325.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Takahashi Y, Tamaki T, Tanaka M, Konoeda Y, Kawamura A, Katori M, Kakita A. Efficacy of heat-shock proteins induced by severe fasting to protect rat livers preserved for 72 hours from cold ischemia/reperfusion injury. Transplant Proc. 1998;30:3700-3702.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Kiemer AK, Gerbes AL, Bilzer M, Vollmar AM. The atrial natriuretic peptide and cGMP: novel activators of the heat shock response in rat livers. Hepatology. 2002;35:88-94.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
38.  Kiemer AK, Kulhanek-Heinze S, Gerwig T, Gerbes AL, Vollmar AM. Stimulation of p38 MAPK by hormonal preconditioning with atrial natriuretic peptide. World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:707-711.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Leppä S, Sistonen L. Heat shock response--pathophysiological implications. Ann Med. 1997;29:73-78.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
40.  Morimoto RI, Santoro MG. Stress-inducible responses and heat shock proteins: new pharmacologic targets for cytoprotection. Nat Biotechnol. 1998;16:833-838.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
41.  Santoro MG. Heat shock factors and the control of the stress response. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000;59:55-63.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Cheng Y, Liu Y, Liang J. Zinc is a potent heat shock protein inducer during liver cold preservation in rats. Chin Med J (Engl). 2002;115:1777-1779.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
43.  Redaelli CA, Tien YH, Kubulus D, Mazzucchelli L, Schilling MK, Wagner AC. Hyperthermia preconditioning induces renal heat shock protein expression, improves cold ischemia tolerance, kidney graft function and survival in rats. Nephron. 2002;90:489-497.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]