Effect of bowel rehabilitative therapy on structural adaptation of remnant small intestine: animal experiment

Figure 1 Body mass before and after surgery. ^aP < 0.05, vs TPNcon; ^bP < 0.05, vs ENcon; ^cP < 0.05, vs EN + GH; ^dP < 0.05, vs EN + Fib. Day 0, refers to the day operation was performed, from which the time was dated.

Figure 2 Plasma insulin-like growth factor level on day 12. ^aP < 0.05, vs Encon; ^bP < 0.05, vs EN + Fib; ^cP < 0.05, vs EN + GH.

Figure 3 Crypt depth, villus height and mucosal thickness of the remnant ileum. ^aP < 0.05, vs TPNcon; ^bP < 0.05, vs ENcon; ^cP < 0.05, vs EN + GH.

Figure 4 Crypt depth, villus height and mucosal thickness of the remnant jejunum. ^aP < 0.05, vs TPNcon; ^bP < 0.05, vs ENcon; ^cP < 0.05, vs EN + GH.