Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2025; 31(14): 104588
Published online Apr 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i14.104588
Figure 1
Figure 1 Feature selection based on least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. A: LASSO coefficient profile; B: The optimal penalty parameter (λ) in the LASSO model determined by 10-fold cross-validation and the minimum criteria in the training set.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Risk score analysis. A: Receiver operating characteristic curve of the risk score; B: Survival analysis of the risk score.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Survival nomogram for predicting the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates of colorectal cancer patients.
Figure 4
Figure 4 The area under the curves for 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival. A: Training cohort; B: Validation cohort. AUC: Area under the curves.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Calibration curves of the nomogram model for survival prediction in the training and validation cohorts. A-C: Calibration curves for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) in the training cohort; D-F: Calibration curves for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS in the validation cohort.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Decision curve analysis of the survival nomogram for predicting overall survival. A-C: Decision curve analysis for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) in the training cohort; D-F: Decision curve analysis for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS in the validation cohort.