Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2022; 28(45): 6397-6409
Published online Dec 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397
Published online Dec 7, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397
Figure 1 Following resection of the lesion.
A: A sessile lesion (15 mm × 13 mm) located in the sigmoid colon; B: Submucosal injection of glycerol fructose was applied; C: A circumferential incision was made using a snare tip; D: The snare could grasp the submucosal tissues below the mucosal lesions; E: En bloc resection was achieved with no complications; F: Histological diagnosis was tubular adenoma with low-grade dysplasia (20×).
Figure 2 Flow diagram of the study.
ITT: Intention-to-treat; PP: Per-protocol; EMR-P: Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting; CEMR: Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection.
Figure 3 Subset analysis for en bloc resection.
EMR-P: Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting; CEMR: Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection.
- Citation: Zhang XQ, Sang JZ, Xu L, Mao XL, Li B, Zhu WL, Yang XY, Yu CH. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(45): 6397-6409
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i45/6397.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397