Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2022; 28(23): 2625-2632
Published online Jun 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i23.2625
Figure 1
Figure 1 Endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound images. A: Endoscopic image showing a 15-mm-sized, submucosal tumor-like, protruding lesion with focal mucosal erythema and depression of overlying mucosa; B: Endoscopic ultrasound image showing a well-circumscribed, slightly heterogeneous, 17 mm × 10 mm sized, isoechoic mass originating from the third sonographic layer.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Abdominal computed tomography images. A and B: Axial and coronal computed tomography images showing a well-enhanced and protruding intraluminal mass in the gastric body.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Process of the endoscopic resection. A: Marking outside the lesion; B: Injection of saline–epinephrine for submucosal lifting; C: Circumferential mucosal incision and partial submucosal dissection; D and E: Resection using a snare; F: Resected tumor.
Figure 4
Figure 4 The histopathological diagnosis of the endoscopically resected lesion. A and B: The tumor had a smooth margin, an internal heterogeneous morphology, and was located in submucosa (H & E, original magnification × 10, × 40); the deep resection margin was positive for tumor; C: The neoplasm consists of infiltrated, atypical spindle-shaped tumor cells with nuclear hyperchromasia (H & E, original magnification × 100); D: Photomicrograph showing highly pleomorphic spindle cells with some rare lipoblasts (H&E, original magnification × 100); E and F: Immunohistochemical staining for tumor cells show diffuse positivity for MDM2 (E) and CDK4 (F).