Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2021; 27(35): 5978-5988
Published online Sep 21, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i35.5978
Published online Sep 21, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i35.5978
Figure 1 Steps of input data preparation for the three-dimensional densely connected convolutional neural network.
A: Three-dimensionally rendered whole volumes at the level of the lesion (indicated by the white frame); B: Cropped cubic volumes containing the lesion; C: The four cubic volumes are concatenated into one four-dimensional file; each volume is represented by a different color. T2w: T2-weighted; HAP: Hepatic arterial phase; PVP: Portal venous phase; HBP: Hepatobiliary phase.
Figure 2 Steps of input data preparation for the two-dimensional densely connected convolutional neural network.
A: Cubic magnetic resonance image volumes containing the lesion; B: Axial slices acquired from the cropped volumes; C: The four axial slices are concatenated into one three-dimensional image; each slice is represented by a different color. T2w: T2-weighted; HAP: Hepatic arterial phase; PVP: Portal venous phase; HBP: Hepatobiliary phase.
Figure 3 Comparison of the training evaluation metric curves and loss curves.
The upper figure shows the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values after each training epoch of the two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) densely connected convolutional neural networks (DenseNets). The best average AUC was obtained after the 46th (2D network) and 62nd (3D network) epochs. The lower figure indicates the loss values for each training epoch of the two networks. 2D: Two-dimensional; 3D: Three-dimensional; AUROC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Figure 4 Receiver operating characteristic curves of the two-dimensional and three-dimensional densely connected convolutional neural network 264 models’ performance on the test set.
A: Two-dimensional; B: Three-dimensional. 2D: Two-dimensional; 3D: Three-dimensional; FNH: Focal nodular hyperplasia; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; MET: Metastasis.
Figure 5 Visualization of the attention maps extracted from the two-dimensional and three-dimensional densely connected convolutional neural networks compared to the hepatobiliary phase input images.
Two-dimensional (lower row) and three-dimensional (upper row) attention maps (column A-C) and hepatobiliary phase (column D) images were extracted from the 3rd dense block of the trained network. A-C: Two-dimensional (lower row) and three-dimensional (upper row) attention maps; D: Hepatobiliary phase images. Column A contains the attention maps for focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), column B for hepatocellular carcinoma, and column C for metastasis diagnosis. The correct diagnosis is FNH in this case. Probabilities for different lesion classes are annotated below each attention map. The red areas are more important for the classification than other image regions. FNH: Focal nodular hyperplasia; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; MET: Metastasis; HBP: Hepatobiliary phase.
- Citation: Stollmayer R, Budai BK, Tóth A, Kalina I, Hartmann E, Szoldán P, Bérczi V, Maurovich-Horvat P, Kaposi PN. Diagnosis of focal liver lesions with deep learning-based multi-channel analysis of hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(35): 5978-5988
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v27/i35/5978.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i35.5978