Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2019; 25(9): 1158-1170
Published online Mar 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1158
Figure 1
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 1 The first generation Endocuff (A) and Endocuff Vision (B).
Figure 2
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 2 Flow diagram of assessment of eligible studies identified.
Figure 3
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 3 Risk of bias of included trials.
Figure 4
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 4 Forest plot for studies assessing the effect of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rate. EAC: Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy; CC: Conventional colonoscopy; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 5
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 5 Forest plot for studies assessing the effect of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on advanced adenoma detection rate. EAC: Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy; CC: Conventional colonoscopy; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 6
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 6 Forest plot for studies assessing the effect of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy on mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy. EAC: Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy; CC: Conventional colonoscopy; CI: Confidence interval; SD: Standard deviation.
Figure 7
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 7 Forest plot for studies assessing the rate of device removal in the Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy arms of the included studies. SE: Standard error; CI: Confidence interval.