Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2019; 25(32): 4696-4714
Published online Aug 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i32.4696
Figure 1
Figure 1 Diagram of moxibustion in rats. Rats were immobilized on a fixing frame. A: A moxa stick of 5 mm in diameter was ignited and placed 2-3 cm above the bilateral Zusanli (ST26) and Tianshu (ST25) for 10 min per day with 7 d of continuous treatment in the mild moxibustion group; B: The sham moxibustion group was given the same treatment as the mild moxibustion group except that moxibustion was treated with an unlit moxa stick.
Figure 2
Figure 2 A rat post-infectious/post-inflammatory irritable bowel syndrome model established by 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid induction. A: Gross structure; B: Pathology of the normal control group and model control group on days 7, 14, 21, and 28; C: Abdominal withdrawal reflex scores of the normal and model control groups under different pressure stimulations on day 28 after model generation. bP < 0.01 vs normal control group. AWR: Abdominal withdrawal reflex.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Effects of mild moxibustion on abdominal withdrawal reflex scores and low-grade inflammation of the colon in each group. A: Abdominal withdrawal reflex score; B: Observed gross structure; C: Histological score; D: Observed histopathology; E: Pathological score. bP < 0.01 vs normal control group; dP < 0.01 vs model control group. AWR: Abdominal withdrawal reflex.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Effects of mild moxibustion on colonic ultrastructure of rats with post-infectious/post-inflammatory irritable bowel syndrome.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Effects of mild moxibustion on serum C-reactive protein levels and colonic myeloperoxidase activities in post-infectious/post-inflammatory irritable bowel syndrome rats in each group. A: Serum C-reactive protein levels; B: Myeloperoxidase activities. bP < 0.01 vs normal control group; dP < 0.01 vs model control group; fP < 0.01 vs sham moxibustion group. CRP: C-reactive protein; MPO: Myeloperoxidase.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Effects of mild moxibustion on the relative DNA abundances of targeted bacteria in feces of post-infectious/post-inflammatory irritable bowel syndrome rats in each group. A: Relative DNA abundance of Lactobacillus; B: Relative DNA abundance of Bifidobacterium; C: Relative DNA abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii; D: Relative DNA abundance of Escherichia coli. bP < 0.01 vs normal control group; cP < 0.05 and dP < 0.01 vs model control group; fP < 0.01 vs sham moxibustion group.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Effects of mild moxibustion on the mRNA and protein expression of NLRP6, ASC, and Caspase-1 in the colon of post-infectious/post-inflammatory irritable bowel syndrome rats in each group. A: The mRNA expression levels of NLRP6, ASC, and Caspase-1; B: The protein expression of NLRP6, ASC, and Caspase-1. aP < 0.05 and bP < 0.01 vs normal control group; dP < 0.01 vs model control group; eP < 0.05 and fP < 0.01 vs sham moxibustion group.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Effects of mild moxibustion on the protein expression of NLRP6, ASC, and Caspase-1 in the colon of post-infectious/post-inflammatory irritable bowel syndrome rats. NLRP6, ASC, and Caspase-1 are localized in the cytoplasm of mucosal cells in the mucosal layer of rats in each group.
Figure 9
Figure 9 Effects of mild moxibustion on the mRNA and protein expression of IL-1β and IL-18 in the colon of post-infectious/post-inflammatory irritable bowel syndrome rats in each group. A: The mRNA expression levels of IL-1β and IL-18; B: Protein expression levels of IL-1β and IL-18. aP < 0.05 and bP < 0.01 vs normal control group; dP < 0.01 vs model control group; fP < 0.01 vs sham moxibustion group.
Figure 10
Figure 10 Effects of mild moxibustion on the mRNA and protein expression of ITLN1 and RELMβ in the colon of post-infectious/post-inflammatory irritable bowel syndrome rats in each group. A: The mRNA expression levels of ITLN1 and RELMβ; B: Protein expression levels of ITLN1 and RELMβ. aP < 0.05 and bP < 0.01 vs normal control group; dP < 0.01 vs model control group; eP < 0.05 and fP < 0.01 vs sham moxibustion group.