Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2019; 25(26): 3450-3467
Published online Jul 14, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3450
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flowchart with identification of eligible studies. A: Molecular analysis; B: Microforceps biopsy.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Quality assessment of the studies using QUADAS-2. A: Tabular presentation of risk bias for each study; B: Graphical display of bias.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Forest plots of the studies included for molecular analysis. In parentheses are the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the sensitivity and specificity. The figure shows the estimated sensitivity and specificity of the study (red circle) and its 95% CI (blue horizontal line). The area of the circle reflects the weight that the study contributes to the meta-analysis.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Summary receiver operating characteristics plots. ROC: Receiver operating characteristic curve; AUC: Area under the curve; SE: Standard error.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Forest plots of molecular analysis and microforceps biopsies on the secondary outcomes of this meta-analysis.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Forest plots of the included studies for microforceps biopsies. In parentheses are the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the sensitivity and specificity. The figure shows the estimated sensitivity and specificity of the study (red circle) and its 95%CI (blue horizontal line). The area of the circle reflects the weight that the study contributes to the meta-analysis.