Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2017; 23(9): 1657-1665
Published online Mar 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1657
Published online Mar 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1657
Figure 1 Ball-tipped FlushKnife and a novel slim type ball-tipped FlushKnife.
FlushKnife-BT: Ball-tipped FlushKnife; FlushKnife-BTS: A novel slim type FlushKnife-BT.
Figure 2 Water aspiration speed.
A total of 200 mL water in a graduated cylinder was aspirated by scopes with 2.8-mm and 3.2-mm channels with FlushKnife-BT or FlushKnife-BTS inserted, and the amount of aspirated water in 10 s was measured. The column denotes mean data and the bar shows the range of experiments performed 9 times. Water aspiration speed was markedly faster with FlushKnife-BTS than with FlushKnife-BT. aP < 0.05, BT vs BTS. FlushKnife-BT: Ball-tipped FlushKnife; FlushKnife-BTS: A novel slim type FlushKnife-BT.
Figure 3 Resistance to knife insertion inside the scope.
Resistance to the insertion of Flushknife-BT or Flushknife-BTS inside the scope at various endoscopic angles was measured using a measuring instrument by NIDEC-SHIMPO CORPORATION. The column denotes mean data and the bar shows the range of experiments performed in triplicate. Resistance was lower at all endoscopic angles with Flushknife-BTS than with Flushknife-BT. aP < 0.05, BT vs BTS. FlushKnife-BT: Ball-tipped FlushKnife; FlushKnife-BTS: A novel slim type FlushKnife-BT.
Figure 4 Waterjet flushing speed.
Waterjet flushing speed was faster with FlushKnife-BT than with FlushKnife-BTS at all pump settings tested. aP < 0.05, BT vs BTS. FlushKnife-BT: Ball-tipped FlushKnife; FlushKnife-BTS: A novel slim type FlushKnife-BT.
Figure 5 Flow diagram of cases that underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection included in the analysis.
FlushKnife-BT: Ball-tipped FlushKnife; FlushKnife-BTS: A novel slim type FlushKnife-BT; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Figure 6 Treatment speed was faster with a novel slim type ball-tipped FlushKnife when the resected size was large, but was similar to that with the conventional knife when the resected size was small.
FlushKnife-BT: Ball-tipped FlushKnife; FlushKnife-BTS: A novel slim type FlushKnife-BT.
Figure 7 Frequency of knife replacement was reduced with a novel slim type ball-tipped FlushKnife regardless of the resected size, while a slightly reduced frequency was observed as the resected size became larger.
FlushKnife-BT: Ball-tipped FlushKnife; FlushKnife-BTS: A novel slim type FlushKnife-BT.
- Citation: Ohara Y, Toyonaga T, Hoshi N, Tanaka S, Baba S, Takihara H, Kawara F, Ishida T, Morita Y, Umegaki E, Azuma T. Usefulness of a novel slim type FlushKnife-BT over conventional FlushKnife-BT in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(9): 1657-1665
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i9/1657.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1657