Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2017; 23(48): 8562-8569
Published online Dec 28, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i48.8562
Figure 1
Figure 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria. CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Division of patients by the cut-off points produced by X-tile plot. X-tile plots for CEA. The produced log-rank χ2 value stratifies the pTxN0M0 GC patients into two groups by a cut-off value 30.02 ng/mL, showing a strong discriminatory capacity, with a χ2 value of 85.15 and a relative risk ratio of 1:2.15. CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Survival analysis of pN0 patients with gastric cancer undergoing curative intent surgery. The P values for the survival comparison was determined by the log-rank test. CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses for pN0 gastric cancer patients using the Cox regression model. A: HR was calculated in multivariate analyses; B: HR was calculated in CEA-low group; C: HR was calculated for CEA-high group. CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen; HR: Hazard ratio.