Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2016; 22(12): 3441-3450
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i12.3441
Figure 1
Figure 1 Plasma osteopontin in patients with cirrhosis and controls (A) and in patients with cirrhosis in Child-Pugh A, B, and C classes (B). Box-plot graphs, boxes correspond to the median value and interquartile range.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Relationship between hepatic venous pressure gradient and plasma osteopontin concentrations in patients with cirrhosis. HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Cumulative proportion of surviving patients with hepatic venous pressure gradient values below and above 10 mmHg (A) and plasma osteopontin levels below and above 80 ng/mL (B) in the whole group of patients using the Kaplan-Meier method. HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient; OPN: Osteopontin.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Cumulative proportion of surviving patients with hepatic venous pressure gradient values below and above 10 mmHg (A) and plasma osteopontin levels below and above 80 ng/mL (B) in compensated patients without ascites using the Kaplan-Meier method. HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient; OPN: Osteopontin.