Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2015; 21(48): 13490-13499
Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13490
Figure 1
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier local recurrence curve. Comparison of the 1-year local recurrence control rates between the radiofrequency ablation (RFA) group and the CyberKnife® group (P = 0.71).
Figure 2
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier intrahepatic distant recurrence curve. Comparison of the 1-year intrahepatic distant control rates between the radiofrequency ablation (RFA) group and the CyberKnife® group (P = 0.91).
Figure 3
Figure 3 Clinical example of good responder patient by CyberKnife®. A 72-year old male with hepatitis C virus cirrhosis received CyberKnife® therapy at a dose of 50 Gy in 5 fractions for hepatocellular carcinoma sized 28 mm in diameter in S6/7. A: Dynamic computed tomography (CT) scan in arterial phase before the treatment showed a hypervascular lesion in S6/7 (arrow); B: Axial view of radiation dose distribution; C: The lesion did not be distinguished on dynamic CT scan in arterial phase 12 mo after the treatment (arrow). This therapeutic response was described as a complete response.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Clinical example of patient had late adverse events by CyberKnife®. A 66-year old male with hepatitis B virus cirrhosis received CyberKnife® therapy at a dose of 42 Gy in 3 fractions for hepatocellular carcinoma sized 40 mm in diameter in S4. The Child-Pugh score before the treatment was 7 and the score rose with 13 when 12 mo after the treatment. After he died of liver failure. A: Dynamic computed tomography (CT) scan in arterial phase before the treatment showed a hypervascular lesion in S4 (arrow); B: The lesion was showed as a hypovasclular lesion on dynamic CT scan in arterial phase 12 mo after the treatment (arrow), but dynamic CT scan showed liver atrophy and massive ascites.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Changes in the Child-Pugh score from before treatment to 12 mo after treatment. In the CyberKnife® group, the Child-Pugh score at 12 mo after treatment was significantly higher than that in the radiofrequency ablation (RFA) group (aP = 0.003) and significantly higher than the score before treatment (cP = 0.034).