Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2015; 21(21): 6736-6744
Published online Jun 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i21.6736
Figure 1
Figure 1 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy ROI area.
Figure 2
Figure 2 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy spectrum characteristics for different fatty liver pathological levels. MRS shows short a low fat peak in the no fatty liver group (A1, A2); In mild fatty liver pathological images (B1), lipid droplets increased slightly [hematoxylin-eosin (HE), magnification × 200]; 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) for mild fatty liver showed a slightly increased fat peak (B2); In moderate fatty liver pathological images (C1), lipid drops relatively increased compared with mild fatty liver (HE, magnification × 200); 1H MRS for moderate fatty liver showed a significantly higher fat peak (C2); In severe fatty liver pathological images (D1), the full field distribution of large bubble lipid droplets (HE, magnification × 200); 1H-MRS for severe fatty liver showed a significantly higher fat peak close to the water peak (D2).
Figure 3
Figure 3 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy of different groups of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. A: 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) of no vs mild fatty liver groups; B: 1H MRS of mild vs moderate fatty liver groups; C: 1H MRS of moderate vs severe fatty liver groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy fat water peak ratio and fat under water peak area ratio in different degrees of fatty liver (A, B).