Discrepancies in the histologic type between biopsy and resected specimens: A cautionary note for mixed-type gastric carcinoma

doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4673

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 21, Issue 15

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (5953)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

320

WORD

215

HTML

2451

Figures (1-3)

131

Tables (1-1)

Sum=3216

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1061

Download

1676

Sum=2737

Apr 21, 2015 (publication date) through Apr 29, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (10)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2015; 21(15): 4673-4679
Published online Apr 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4673

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Comparison of each discrepancy in the histologic type between biopsy and resected specimens with the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. Pure D group: A pure differentiated component with no undifferentiated component; D > U group: A differentiated-predominant mixed type a < 50% undifferentiated component; U > D group: An undifferentiated-predominant mixed type with a > 50% undifferentiated component; and pure U group: A pure undifferentiated component with no differentiated component.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Comparison of each discrepancy in the histologic type between biopsy and resected specimens in the tumor-node-metastasis classification. Pure D group: A pure differentiated component with no undifferentiated component; D > U group: A differentiated-predominant mixed type with a < 50% undifferentiated component; U > D group: An undifferentiated-predominant mixed type with a > 50% undifferentiated component; and pure U group: A pure undifferentiated component with no differentiated component.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Comparison of detected histologic mixed-type gastric cancer rates between biopsy and resected specimens in the Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma and tumor-node-metastasis classification. Pure D group: A pure differentiated component with no undifferentiated component; D > U group: A differentiated-predominant mixed type with a < 50% undifferentiated component; U > D group: An undifferentiated-predominant mixed type with a > 50% undifferentiated component; and pure U group: A pure undifferentiated component with no differentiated component.

Citation: Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Miyamae M, Kosuga T, Konishi H, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, Okamoto K, Kishimoto M, Otsuji E. Discrepancies in the histologic type between biopsy and resected specimens: A cautionary note for mixed-type gastric carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(15): 4673-4679
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i15/4673.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4673