Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2014; 20(25): 8282-8287
Published online Jul 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8282
Published online Jul 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8282
Figure 1 Flow diagram of trial selection.
Figure 2 Comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection.
A: En bloc resection rate; B: Histological resection rate; C: Local recurrence rate; D: Procedural time; E: Procedure-related complications. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection.
- Citation: Wang J, Zhang XH, Ge J, Yang CM, Liu JY, Zhao SL. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(25): 8282-8287
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i25/8282.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8282