Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2014; 20(18): 5540-5547
Published online May 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5540
Figure 1
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 1 Process of article screening.
Figure 2
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 2 Comparison of en bloc resection (A) and curative rates (B) between endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection.
Figure 3
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 3 Forest plot showing the procedural time for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection.
Figure 4
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 4 Incidence of perforation (A), stricture (B) and bleeding (C) between endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection.
Figure 5
Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 5 Comparison of recurrence rate between endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection.