Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2013; 19(41): 7197-7204
Published online Nov 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7197
Published online Nov 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7197
Figure 1 Meta-analysis.
A: Cecal intubation rate comparison for the magnetic endoscopic imaging (MEI) colonoscopy and standard colonoscopy (SC); OR with 95%CI; B: Cecal intubation time comparison for the MEI colonoscopy and SC; MDs with 95%CI; C: Cecal intubation rate: subgroup analysis of trials comparing the MEI colonoscopy and SC with experienced endoscopists; OR with 95%CI; D: Cecal intubation rate: subgroup analysis of trials comparing the MEI colonoscopy and SC with inexperienced endoscopists; OR with 95%CI.
-
Citation: Chen Y, Duan YT, Xie Q, Qin XP, Chen B, Xia L, Zhou Y, Li NN, Wu XT. Magnetic endoscopic imaging
vs standard colonoscopy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(41): 7197-7204 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i41/7197.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7197