Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2012; 18(45): 6657-6668
Published online Dec 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6657
Published online Dec 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6657
Figure 1 Flow diagram depicting the process of identification and inclusion of selected studies.
Figure 2 Forest plots demonstrating operative, postoperative and oncologic outcomes.
A: Forest plots illustrating results of operative outcomes in the form of meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic vs open resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (high-quality studies only); B: Forest plots illustrating results of postoperative outcomes in the form of meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic vs open resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (high-quality studies only); C: Forest plots illustrating results of oncologic outcomes in the form of meta-analysis comparing laparoscopic vs open resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (high quality studies only). Pooled weighted mean difference or odds ratio with 95%CI was calculated using the fixed-effects or random effects model. IV: Iverse variance; M-H: Mantel-Haenszel.
Figure 3 Funnel plot to investigate publication bias.
The laparoscopic vs the open group: A funnel plot showing the operation time, hospital stay and tumor recurrence. OR: Odds ratio; MD: Mean difference.
-
Citation: Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Javed MA, Huang W, Mukherjee R, Mai G, Sutton R, Liu XB, Hu WM. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic
vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(45): 6657-6668 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i45/6657.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6657