Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2011; 17(6): 796-803
Published online Feb 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i6.796
Figure 1
Figure 1 Four most significant expression profiles in liver samples from biliary atresia patients. 0: Normal control group; 1: Neonatal cholestasis group; 2: Group of biliary atresia (BA) patients > 90 d; 3: Group of BA patients at the age of 60-90 d; 4: Group of BA patients < 60 d. Y axis represents the expression change expressed as log2 [v(i)/v(0)].
Figure 2
Figure 2 Dynamic gene networks constructed showing the key regulators that may play a central role in the pathogenesis of biliary atresia. Circles indicate genes in the 4 expression profiles, solid lines indicate direct interactions, and size of circles indicates their interactions with other molecules. Coloring is classified according to the k core, and red indicates high k core.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction showing expression levels of RRAS, POMC, SLC26A6, and STX3 genes. BA: Biliary atresia; Control: Neonatal cholestasis.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction showing significantly higher relative expression levels of RRAS, POMC, SLC26A6 and STX3 genes in biliary atresia patients (n = 40) than in neonatal cholestasis patients (n = 14). aP < 0.05 vs liver tissue samples from neonatal cholestasis patients.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Correlation between expression of RRAS in liver tissue samples and prognosis of biliary atresia patients within 2 years.