Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2011; 17(38): 4321-4333
Published online Oct 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i38.4321
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow chart of study recruitment. RCTs: Randomized controlled clinical trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Effect of lamivudine treatment vs control (placebo or no intervention) on interruption of hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission as indicated by newborn serum hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B virus DNA. Vertical line indicates no difference between compared treatment. Horizontal lines show 95% CIs. Squares indicate point estimates, and the size of the squares indicates the weight of each study in the meta-analysis. HBeAg: Hepatitis B e antigen; HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen; M-H random: Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model; CI: Confidence interval; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; RR: Risk ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Lamivudine treatment vs hepatitis B immunoglobulin in interruption of hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission as indicated by newborn serum hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B virus DNA. CI: Confidence interval; HBIG: Hepatitis B immunoglobulin; HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen; HBeAg: Hepatitis B e antigen; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; M-H random: Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model; RR: Risk ratio.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Effects of lamivudine vs control (placebo or no intervention) on interruption of hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission as indicated by serum hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B virus DNA of infants 6-12 mo after birth. Vertical line indicates no difference between compared treatment. Horizontal lines show 95% CIs. Squares indicate point estimates, and the size of the squares indicates the weight of each study in the meta-analysis. HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen; M-H random: Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model; CI: Confidence interval; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; RR: Risk ratio.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Influence of maternal viral load before or after lamivudine treatment on hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission as indicated by serum hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B virus DNA of newborns within 24 h after birth. Vertical line indicates no difference between compared treatments. Horizontal lines show 95% CIs. Squares indicate point estimates, and the size of the squares indicates the weight of each study in the meta-analysis. CI: Confidence interval; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; M-H random: Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model; RR: Risk ratio; HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Effect of lamivudine treatment starting time on interruption of mother-to-child transmission indicated by newborn hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B virus DNA. Vertical line indicates no difference between compared treatments. Horizontal lines show 95% CIs. Squares indicate point estimates, and the size of the squares indicates the weight of each study in the meta-analysis. CI: Confidence interval; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; M-H random: Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model; RR: Risk ratio; HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Efficacy of lamivudine treatment in “high-quality” studies or “low-quality” studies in interruption of mother-to-child transmission indicated by serum hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis B virus DNA of newborns. Vertical line indicates no difference between compared treatments. Horizontal lines show 95% CIs. Squares indicate point estimates, and the size of the squares indicates the weight of each study in the meta-analysis. CI: Confidence interval; HBV: Hepatitis B virus; M-H random: Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model; RR: Risk ratio; HBsAg: Hepatitis B surface antigen.