Colorectal Cancer
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. May 1, 2004; 10(9): 1301-1305
Published online May 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i9.1301
Figure 1
Figure 1 Quality identification of mRNA extracted from two cell lines. Lane 1: SW480 cell line, Lane 2: SW620 cell line.
Figure 2
Figure 2 RsaI digestion analysis of synthesized cDNA. Lane 1: Synthesized cDNA digested with RsaI, Lane 2: Synthesized cDNA, Lane M: Marker DGL2000.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Ligation efficiency analysis of ds cDNA. Lane 1: PCR products using tester1-1 (adaptor1-ligated-cDNA fragment) as the template and the G3PDH3’, 5’ primer; Lane 2: PCR prod-ucts using tester1-1 as the template and the G3PDH3’ primer, PCR primer1; Lane 3: PCR products using tester1-2 (adaptor2R-ligated-cDNA fragments) as the template and the G3PDH3’, 5’ primer; Lane 4: PCR products using tester1-2 as the template and the G3PDH3’ primer, PCR primer1; Lane M: Marker DGL2000.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Electrophoresis of secondary PCR products. Lane C: Positive control cDNA supplied with the kit, Lane 1: Unsubtracted cDNA, Lane 2: Subtracted cDNA.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Reduction of G3PDH by PCR subtraction. Lanes 1-4: Unsubtracted secondary PCR products, Lanes 5-8: Subtracted secondary PCR products, Lanes 1, 5: 18 cycles Lane 2, 6: 23 cycles, Lanes 3, 7: 28 cycles, Lane 4, 8: 33 cycles, Lane M: Marker DGL2000.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Blue/white screening for target clones. Two hundred and thirty-five white clones (86%) and 37 blue clones were seen on the agar plates in group A, and 232 white clones (91%) and 21 blue clones were seen in group R.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Different lengths of cDNA fragments from white clones amplified by PCR. Lanes 1-8: Randomly-selected white clones, Lane M: Marker DGL2000.