Clinical Research
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 15, 2004; 10(16): 2379-2382
Published online Aug 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i16.2379
Figure 1
Figure 1 Estimated cure rates of erosive gastritis by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis among patients treated with DA-9601 (180 mg or 360 mg, t. i.d.) or cetraxate (600 mg, t.i.d.) for 2 wk. aP < 0.05 vs 600 mg of cetraxate.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Estimated cure rates of erosive gastritis by per proto-col (PP) analysis among patients treated with DA-9601 (180 mg or 360 mg, t. i.d.) or cetraxate (600 mg, t.i.d.) for 2 wk. aP < 0.05 vs 600 mg of cetraxate.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Estimated improvement rates of erosive gastritis by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis among patients treated with DA-9601 (180 mg or 360 mg, t. i.d.) or cetraxate (600 mg, t.i.d.) for 2 wk. aP < 0.05 vs 600 mg of cetraxate.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Estimated improvement rates of erosive gastritis by per protocol (PP) analysis among patients treated with DA-9601 (180 mg or 360 mg, t. i.d.) or cetraxate (600 mg, t.i.d.) for 2 wk. aP < 0.05 vs. 600 mg of cetraxate.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Overall reduction rates of symptoms among patients treated with cetraxate (600 mg, t. i.d.) or DA-9601 (180 mg and 360 mg, t.i.d.) for 2 wk.