BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Carbon C, Held MJ, Schütz A. Reading Emotions in Faces With and Without Masks Is Relatively Independent of Extended Exposure and Individual Difference Variables. Front Psychol 2022;13:856971. [DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.856971] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Castelli L, Tumino M, Carraro L. Face mask use as a categorical dimension in social perception. Sci Rep 2022;12:17860. [PMID: 36284157 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22772-2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Verroca A, de Rienzo CM, Gambarota F, Sessa P. Mapping the perception-space of facial expressions in the era of face masks. Front Psychol 2022;13:956832. [DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956832] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Rinck M, Primbs MA, Verpaalen IAM, Bijlstra G. Face masks impair facial emotion recognition and induce specific emotion confusions. Cogn Research 2022;7:83. [DOI: 10.1186/s41235-022-00430-5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Proverbio AM, Cerri A. The Recognition of Facial Expressions Under Surgical Masks: The Primacy of Anger. Front Neurosci 2022;16:864490. [DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.864490] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Cannito L, Anzani S, Bortolotti A, Di Domenico A, Palumbo R. Face Mask Reduces the Effect of Proposer’s (Un)Trustworthiness on Intertemporal and Risky Choices. Front Psychol 2022;13:926520. [DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.926520] [Reference Citation Analysis]