BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Goekoop FM, van El CG, Widdershoven GAM, Dzinalija N, Cornel MC, Evans N. Systematic scoping review of the concept of 'genetic identity' and its relevance for germline modification. PLoS One 2020;15:e0228263. [PMID: 31978192 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228263] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Gregg B. The Person-Affecting/Identity-Affecting Distinction between Forms of Human Germline Genome Editing Is Useless in Practical Ethics. Am J Bioeth 2022;22:49-51. [PMID: 36040897 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2105423] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Ishii T, de Miguel Beriain I. Shifting to a model of donor conception that entails a communication agreement among the parents, donor, and offspring. BMC Med Ethics 2022;23:18. [PMID: 35246130 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00756-1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Liaw Y, Turkmendag I, Hollingsworth K. Reinterpreting “genetic identity” in the regulatory and ethical context of heritable genome editing. New Genetics and Society 2021;40:406-24. [DOI: 10.1080/14636778.2021.1941829] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Shumbusha D, Shimelis H, Laing M, Mashilo J. Genetic analysis of dual-purpose sweetpotato genotypes using simple sequence repeat markers and phenotypic traits. Journal of Crop Improvement 2022;36:108-27. [DOI: 10.1080/15427528.2021.1910093] [Reference Citation Analysis]