BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Falker-Gieske C, Iffland H, Preuß S, Bessei W, Drögemüller C, Bennewitz J, Tetens J. Meta-analyses of genome wide association studies in lines of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking using imputed sequence level genotypes. BMC Genet 2020;21:114. [PMID: 33004014 DOI: 10.1186/s12863-020-00920-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Falker-Gieske C, Paul NF, Spourita M, Gilthorpe JD, Gustmann K, Tetens J. Resistance to chicken amyloid arthropathy is associated with a dysfunctional mutation in serum amyloid A. FASEB J 2023;37:e22700. [PMID: 36515677 DOI: 10.1096/fj.202200359RR] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Falker-Gieske C, Bennewitz J, Tetens J. Structural variation and eQTL analysis in two experimental populations of chickens divergently selected for feather-pecking behavior. Neurogenetics 2023;24:29-41. [PMID: 36449109 DOI: 10.1007/s10048-022-00705-5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Falker-gieske C, Bennewitz J, Tetens J. Structural variation and eQTL analysis in two experimental populations of chickens divergently selected for feather pecking behavior.. [DOI: 10.1101/2022.09.16.508210] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Mott AC, Mott A, Preuß S, Bennewitz J, Tetens J, Falker-gieske C. eQTL analysis of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking identifies KLF14 as a potential key regulator for this behavioral disorder. Front Genet 2022;13:969752. [DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.969752] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Ding J, Ying F, Li Q, Zhang G, Zhang J, Liu R, Zheng M, Wen J, Zhao G. A significant quantitative trait locus on chromosome Z and its impact on egg production traits in seven maternal lines of meat-type chicken. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2022;13:96. [PMID: 35941697 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-022-00744-w] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Michel V, Berk J, Bozakova N, van der Eijk J, Estevez I, Mircheva T, Relic R, Rodenburg TB, Sossidou EN, Guinebretière M. The Relationships between Damaging Behaviours and Health in Laying Hens. Animals 2022;12:986. [DOI: 10.3390/ani12080986] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Jiang S, Hu J, Cheng H. The Impact of Probiotic Bacillus subtilis on Injurious Behavior in Laying Hens. Animals 2022;12:870. [DOI: 10.3390/ani12070870] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Leishman EM, van Staaveren N, Osborne VR, Wood BJ, Baes CF, Harlander-Matauschek A. The Prevalence of Integument Injuries and Associated Risk Factors Among Canadian Turkeys. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:757776. [PMID: 35071378 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.757776] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Grandin T, Deesing MJ. Genetics and animal welfare. Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-85752-9.00013-5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Falker-Gieske C, Bennewitz J, Tetens J. The light response in chickens divergently selected for feather pecking behavior reveals mechanistic insights towards psychiatric disorders. Mol Biol Rep 2021. [PMID: 34954808 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-021-07111-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]