BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Tennessen JB, Parks SE, Langkilde T. Traffic noise causes physiological stress and impairs breeding migration behaviour in frogs. Conserv Physiol 2014;2:cou032. [PMID: 27293653 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/cou032] [Cited by in Crossref: 66] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 45] [Article Influence: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Varga JFA, Bui-Marinos MP, Katzenback BA. Frog Skin Innate Immune Defences: Sensing and Surviving Pathogens. Front Immunol 2018;9:3128. [PMID: 30692997 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03128] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22] [Article Influence: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Goossens S, Wybouw N, Van Leeuwen T, Bonte D. The physiology of movement. Mov Ecol 2020;8:5. [PMID: 32042434 DOI: 10.1186/s40462-020-0192-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Edwards KL, Edes AN, Brown JL. Stress, Well-Being and Reproductive Success. In: Comizzoli P, Brown JL, Holt WV, editors. Reproductive Sciences in Animal Conservation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 91-162. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23633-5_5] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Walthers AR, Barber CA. Traffic noise as a potential stressor to offspring of an urban bird, the European Starling. J Ornithol 2020;161:459-67. [DOI: 10.1007/s10336-019-01733-z] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Tennessen JB, Parks SE, Tennessen TP, Langkilde T. Raising a racket: invasive species compete acoustically with native treefrogs. Animal Behaviour 2016;114:53-61. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.01.021] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Watson H, Videvall E, Andersson MN, Isaksson C. Transcriptome analysis of a wild bird reveals physiological responses to the urban environment. Sci Rep 2017;7:44180. [PMID: 28290496 DOI: 10.1038/srep44180] [Cited by in Crossref: 52] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42] [Article Influence: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Ditmer MA, Rettler SJ, Fieberg JR, Iaizzo PA, Laske TG, Noyce KV, Garshelis DL. American black bears perceive the risks of crossing roads. Behavioral Ecology 2018;29:667-75. [DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ary020] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Jafari Z, Faraji J, Mirza Agha B, Metz GAS, Kolb BE, Mohajerani MH. The Adverse Effects of Auditory Stress on Mouse Uterus Receptivity and Behaviour. Sci Rep 2017;7:4720. [PMID: 28680154 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04943-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Kolenda K, Kaczmarski M, Najbar A, Rozenblut-kościsty B, Chmielewska M, Najbar B. Road-killed toads as a non-invasive source to study age structure of spring migrating population. Eur J Wildl Res 2019;65. [DOI: 10.1007/s10344-018-1240-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Flores R, Penna M, Wingfield JC, Cuevas E, Vásquez RA, Quirici V. Effects of traffic noise exposure on corticosterone, glutathione and tonic immobility in chicks of a precocial bird. Conserv Physiol 2019;7:coz061. [PMID: 31528349 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coz061] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Reid AJ, Carlson AK, Creed IF, Eliason EJ, Gell PA, Johnson PTJ, Kidd KA, MacCormack TJ, Olden JD, Ormerod SJ, Smol JP, Taylor WW, Tockner K, Vermaire JC, Dudgeon D, Cooke SJ. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2019;94:849-73. [PMID: 30467930 DOI: 10.1111/brv.12480] [Cited by in Crossref: 514] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 210] [Article Influence: 128.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Jafari Z, Kolb BE, Mohajerani MH. Noise exposure accelerates the risk of cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: Adulthood, gestational, and prenatal mechanistic evidence from animal studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2020;117:110-28. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.001] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Kaiser K, Devito J, Jones CG, Marentes A, Perez R, Umeh L, Weickum RM, McGovern KE, Wilson EH, Saltzman W. Reproductive and immune effects of chronic corticosterone treatment in male White's treefrogs, Litoria caerulea. Conserv Physiol 2015;3:cov022. [PMID: 27293707 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/cov022] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Schou CPE, Levengood AL, Potvin DA. Limited effects of traffic noise on behavioural responses to conspecific mating calls in the eastern sedge frog Litoria fallax. Acta Ethol 2021;:1-10. [PMID: 34366558 DOI: 10.1007/s10211-021-00378-7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Brady SP, Richardson JL. Road ecology: shifting gears toward evolutionary perspectives. Front Ecol Environ 2017;15:91-8. [DOI: 10.1002/fee.1458] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Hammond TT, Blackwood PE, Shablin SA, Richards-zawacki CL. Relationships between glucocorticoids and infection with Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in three amphibian species. General and Comparative Endocrinology 2020;285:113269. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2019.113269] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Potvin DA. Coping with a changing soundscape: avoidance, adjustments and adaptations. Anim Cogn 2017;20:9-18. [PMID: 27215574 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-016-0999-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Hammond TT, Vo M, Burton CT, Surber LL, Lacey EA, Smith JE, Hayes L. Physiological and behavioral responses to anthropogenic stressors in a human-tolerant mammal. Journal of Mammalogy 2019;100:1928-40. [DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyz134] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Pereyra LC, Akmentins MS, Salica MJ, Quiroga MF, Moreno CE, Vaira M. Tolerant and avoiders in an urban landscape: anuran species richness and functional groups responses in the Yungas’ forest of NW Argentina. Urban Ecosyst 2021;24:141-52. [DOI: 10.1007/s11252-020-01025-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Titon SCM, Assis VR, Titon Junior B, Cassettari BDO, Fernandes PACM, Gomes FR. Captivity effects on immune response and steroid plasma levels of a Brazilian toad ( Rhinella schneideri ): TITON ET AL. J Exp Zool 2017;327:127-38. [DOI: 10.1002/jez.2078] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Kaiser K, Devito J, Jones CG, Marentes A, Perez R, Umeh L, Weickum RM, McGovern KE, Wilson EH, Saltzman W. Effects of anthropogenic noise on endocrine and reproductive function in White's treefrog, Litoria caerulea. Conserv Physiol 2015;3:cou061. [PMID: 27293682 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/cou061] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Watson H, Powell D, Salmón P, Jacobs A, Isaksson C. Urbanization is associated with modifications in DNA methylation in a small passerine bird. Evol Appl 2021;14:85-98. [PMID: 33519958 DOI: 10.1111/eva.13160] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Medeiros CI, Both C, Grant T, Hartz SM. Invasion of the acoustic niche: variable responses by native species to invasive American bullfrog calls. Biol Invasions 2017;19:675-90. [DOI: 10.1007/s10530-016-1327-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Lennox RJ, Chapman JM, Souliere CM, Tudorache C, Wikelski M, Metcalfe JD, Cooke SJ. Conservation physiology of animal migration. Conserv Physiol 2016;4:cov072. [PMID: 27293751 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/cov072] [Cited by in Crossref: 46] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Farina A. The Ecological Effects of Noise on Species and Communities. In: Farina A, Gage SH, editors. Ecoacoustics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017. pp. 95-107. [DOI: 10.1002/9781119230724.ch6] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
26 Tennessen JB, Parks SE, Swierk L, Reinert LK, Holden WM, Rollins-Smith LA, Walsh KA, Langkilde T. Frogs adapt to physiologically costly anthropogenic noise. Proc Biol Sci 2018;285:20182194. [PMID: 30464067 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2194] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
27 Brady SP. Environmental exposure does not explain putative maladaptation in road-adjacent populations. Oecologia 2017;184:931-42. [PMID: 28717880 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3912-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
28 Langkilde T, Thawley CJ, Robbins TR. Behavioral Adaptations to Invasive Species. Elsevier; 2017. pp. 199-235. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.asb.2016.12.003] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
29 Lenis PR, Guillermo-ferreira R. Effect of noise on behavioural response to simulated territorial intrusion in the Great Kiskadee (Pitangus sulphuratus) (Aves: Tyrannidae). Urban Ecosyst 2020;23:93-6. [DOI: 10.1007/s11252-019-00906-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
30 Calsbeek R, Zamora-Camacho FJ, Symes LB. Individual contributions to group chorus dynamics influence access to mating opportunities in wood frogs. Ecol Lett 2022. [PMID: 35305074 DOI: 10.1111/ele.14002] [Reference Citation Analysis]
31 Blair HB, Merchant ND, Friedlaender AS, Wiley DN, Parks SE. Evidence for ship noise impacts on humpback whale foraging behaviour. Biol Lett 2016;12:20160005. [PMID: 27512131 DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0005] [Cited by in Crossref: 55] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32] [Article Influence: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
32 Swierk L, Langkilde T. Fitness costs of mating with preferred females in a scramble mating system. Behavioral Ecology 2019;30:658-65. [DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arz001] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
33 Zaffaroni-caorsi V, Both C, Márquez R, Llusia D, Narins P, Debon M, Borges-martins M. Effects of anthropogenic noise on anuran amphibians. Bioacoustics. [DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2022.2070543] [Reference Citation Analysis]
34 Muñoz MI, Quispe M, Maliqueo M, Penna M. Biotic and abiotic sounds affect calling activity but not plasma testosterone levels in male frogs (Batrachyla taeniata) in the field and in captivity. Horm Behav 2020;118:104605. [PMID: 31644890 DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2019.104605] [Reference Citation Analysis]
35 Senzaki M, Kadoya T, Francis CD, Ishiyama N, Nakamura F, Angelier F. Suffering in receivers: Negative effects of noise persist regardless of experience in female anurans. Funct Ecol 2018;32:2054-64. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13130] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
36 Balasubramaniam KN, Bliss-moreau E, Beisner BA, Marty PR, Kaburu SS, Mccowan B. Addressing the challenges of research on human-wildlife interactions using the concept of Coupled Natural & Human Systems. Biological Conservation 2021;257:109095. [DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109095] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
37 Bennett VJ. Effects of Road Density and Pattern on the Conservation of Species and Biodiversity. Curr Landscape Ecol Rep 2017;2:1-11. [DOI: 10.1007/s40823-017-0020-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 50] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
38 Legett HD, Madden RP, Aihara I, Bernal XE, Goymann W. Traffic noise differentially impacts call types in a Japanese treefrog ( Buergeria japonica ). Ethology 2020;126:576-83. [DOI: 10.1111/eth.13009] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
39 Laforge A, Archaux F, Bas Y, Gouix N, Calatayud F, Latge T, Barbaro L. Landscape context matters for attractiveness and effective use of road underpasses by bats. Biological Conservation 2019;237:409-22. [DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.023] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
40 Grace MK, Smith DJ, Noss RF. Roadside Abundance of Anurans within a Community Correlates with Reproductive Investment. Front Ecol Evol 2017;5:65. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00065] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
41 Grace MK, Noss RF. Evidence for selective avoidance of traffic noise by anuran amphibians. Anim Conserv 2018;21:343-51. [DOI: 10.1111/acv.12400] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
42 Hall EM, Brady SP, Mattheus NM, Earley RL, Diamond M, Crespi EJ. Physiological consequences of exposure to salinized roadside ponds on wood frog larvae and adults. Biological Conservation 2017;209:98-106. [DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.013] [Cited by in Crossref: 26] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
43 Dutta H. Insights into the impacts of four current environmental problems on flying birds. Energ Ecol Environ 2017;2:329-49. [DOI: 10.1007/s40974-017-0075-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
44 Simmons AM, Narins PM. Effects of Anthropogenic Noise on Amphibians and Reptiles. In: Slabbekoorn H, Dooling RJ, Popper AN, Fay RR, editors. Effects of Anthropogenic Noise on Animals. New York: Springer; 2018. pp. 179-208. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8574-6_7] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
45 Nakano Y, Senzaki M, Ishiyama N, Yamanaka S, Miura K, Nakamura F. Noise pollution alters matrix permeability for dispersing anurans: Differential effects among land covers. Global Ecology and Conservation 2018;16:e00484. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00484] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
46 Kleist NJ, Guralnick RP, Cruz A, Lowry CA, Francis CD. Chronic anthropogenic noise disrupts glucocorticoid signaling and has multiple effects on fitness in an avian community. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115:E648-57. [PMID: 29311304 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1709200115] [Cited by in Crossref: 98] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63] [Article Influence: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
47 Hernani Lineros LM, Chimènes A, Maille A, Dingess K, Rumiz DI, Adret P. Response of Bolivian gray titi monkeys (Plecturocebus donacophilus) to an anthropogenic noise gradient: behavioral and hormonal correlates. PeerJ 2020;8:e10417. [PMID: 33240684 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10417] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
48 Teixeira FZ, Rytwinski T, Fahrig L. Inference in road ecology research: what we know versus what we think we know. Biol Lett 2020;16:20200140. [PMID: 32692946 DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0140] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
49 Swaddle JP, Francis CD, Barber JR, Cooper CB, Kyba CC, Dominoni DM, Shannon G, Aschehoug E, Goodwin SE, Kawahara AY, Luther D, Spoelstra K, Voss M, Longcore T. A framework to assess evolutionary responses to anthropogenic light and sound. Trends Ecol Evol 2015;30:550-60. [PMID: 26169593 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.009] [Cited by in Crossref: 163] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 112] [Article Influence: 23.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
50 Lara RA, Vasconcelos RO. Impact of noise on development, physiological stress and behavioural patterns in larval zebrafish. Sci Rep 2021;11:6615. [PMID: 33758247 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85296-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
51 Kolenda K, Kuśmierek N, Kadej M, Smolis A, Ogielska M. Road-killed toads as a non-invasive source to study feeding ecology of migrating population. Eur J Wildl Res 2019;65. [DOI: 10.1007/s10344-019-1292-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
52 Iglesias-carrasco M, Martín J, Cabido C. Urban habitats can affect body size and body condition but not immune response in amphibians. Urban Ecosyst 2017;20:1331-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s11252-017-0685-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
53 Caorsi V, Guerra V, Furtado R, Llusia D, Miron LR, Borges-Martins M, Both C, Narins PM, Meenderink SWF, Márquez R. Anthropogenic substrate-borne vibrations impact anuran calling. Sci Rep 2019;9:19456. [PMID: 31857629 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55639-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
54 Mills SC, Beldade R, Henry L, Laverty D, Nedelec SL, Simpson SD, Radford AN. Hormonal and behavioural effects of motorboat noise on wild coral reef fish. Environmental Pollution 2020;262:114250. [DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114250] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
55 Narayan EJ, Forsburg ZR, Davis DR, Gabor CR. Non-invasive Methods for Measuring and Monitoring Stress Physiology in Imperiled Amphibians. Front Ecol Evol 2019;7:431. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00431] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
56 Angelier F, Meillère A, Grace JK, Trouvé C, Brischoux F. No evidence for an effect of traffic noise on the development of the corticosterone stress response in an urban exploiter. General and Comparative Endocrinology 2016;232:43-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.12.007] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
57 Baugh AT, Bastien B, Still MB, Stowell N. Validation of water-borne steroid hormones in a tropical frog (Physalaemus pustulosus). General and Comparative Endocrinology 2018;261:67-80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2018.01.025] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
58 Blumstein DT, Berger-tal O. Understanding sensory mechanisms to develop effective conservation and management tools. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 2015;6:13-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.06.008] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
59 Troïanowski M, Mondy N, Dumet A, Arcanjo C, Lengagne T. Effects of traffic noise on tree frog stress levels, immunity, and color signaling: Noise Consequences on Tree Frogs. Conservation Biology 2017;31:1132-40. [DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12893] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
60 Herr MW, Graham SP, Langkilde T. Stressed snakes strike first: Hormone levels and defensive behavior in free ranging cottonmouths (Agkistrodon piscivorus). General and Comparative Endocrinology 2017;243:89-95. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2016.11.003] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
61 Nelson DV, Klinck H, Carbaugh-Rutland A, Mathis CL, Morzillo AT, Garcia TS. Calling at the highway: The spatiotemporal constraint of road noise on Pacific chorus frog communication. Ecol Evol 2017;7:429-40. [PMID: 28070305 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2622] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
62 Leon E, Peltzer PM, Lorenzon R, Lajmanovich RC, Beltzer AH. Effect of traffic noise on Scinax nasicus advertisement call (Amphibia, Anura). Iheringia, Sér Zool 2019;109:e2019007. [DOI: 10.1590/1678-4766e2019007] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]