BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Koornneef A, Dotlačil J, van den Broek P, Sanders T. The influence of linguistic and cognitive factors on the time course of verb-based implicit causality. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2016;69:455-81. [DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1055282] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Kim H, Chun E. Effects of topicality in the interpretation of implicit consequentiality: evidence from offline and online referential processing in Korean. Linguistics 2022;0. [DOI: 10.1515/ling-2020-0197] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Solstad T, Bott O. On the nature of implicit causality and consequentiality: the case of psychological verbs. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2022.2069277] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Guan S, Arnold JE. The predictability of implicit causes: testing frequency and topicality explanations. Discourse Processes 2021;58:943-69. [DOI: 10.1080/0163853x.2021.1974690] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Bott O, Solstad T. Discourse expectations: explaining the implicit causality biases of verbs. Linguistics 2021;59:361-416. [DOI: 10.1515/ling-2021-0007] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Grüter T, Rohde H. Limits on expectation-based processing: Use of grammatical aspect for co-reference in L2. Applied Psycholinguistics 2021;42:51-75. [DOI: 10.1017/s0142716420000582] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Kim H, Grüter T. PREDICTIVE PROCESSING OF IMPLICIT CAUSALITY IN A SECOND LANGUAGE: A VISUAL-WORLD EYE-TRACKING STUDY. Stud Second Lang Acquis 2021;43:133-54. [DOI: 10.1017/s0272263120000443] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 van Renswoude DR, Raijmakers MEJ, Koornneef A, Johnson SP, Hunnius S, Visser I. Gazepath: An eye-tracking analysis tool that accounts for individual differences and data quality. Behav Res Methods 2018;50:834-52. [PMID: 28593606 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0909-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 40] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43] [Article Influence: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 van den Hoven E, Ferstl EC. The Roles of Implicit Causality and Discourse Context in Pronoun Resolution. Front Commun 2018;3. [DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2018.00053] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Grüter T, Takeda A, Rohde H, Schafer AJ. Intersentential coreference expectations reflect mental models of events. Cognition 2018;177:172-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.015] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Koornneef A, Mulders I. Can We 'Read' the Eye-Movement Patterns of Readers? Unraveling the Relationship Between Reading Profiles and Processing Strategies. J Psycholinguist Res 2017;46:39-56. [PMID: 26996449 DOI: 10.1007/s10936-016-9418-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]