BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Hertz S, Weiner B, Perets N, London M. Temporal structure of mouse courtship vocalizations facilitates syllable labeling. Commun Biol 2020;3:333. [PMID: 32591576 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-1053-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Neophytou D, Arribas DM, Arora T, Levy RB, Park IM, Oviedo HV. Differences in temporal processing speeds between the right and left auditory cortex reflect the strength of recurrent synaptic connectivity. PLoS Biol 2022;20:e3001803. [PMID: 36269764 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001803] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Stoumpou V, Vargas CDM, Schade PF, Boyd JL, Giannakopoulos T, Jarvis ED. Analysis of Mouse Vocal Communication (AMVOC): a deep, unsupervised method for rapid detection, analysis and classification of ultrasonic vocalisations. Bioacoustics. [DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2022.2099973] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Netser S, Nahardiya G, Weiss-Dicker G, Dadush R, Goussha Y, John SR, Taub M, Werber Y, Sapir N, Yovel Y, Harony-Nicolas H, Buxbaum JD, Cohen L, Crammer K, Wagner S. TrackUSF, a novel tool for automated ultrasonic vocalization analysis, reveals modified calls in a rat model of autism. BMC Biol 2022;20:159. [PMID: 35820848 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-022-01299-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Fernández-vargas M, Riede T, Pasch B. Mechanisms and constraints underlying acoustic variation in rodents. Animal Behaviour 2022;184:135-47. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.07.011] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Lee J, Rothschild G. Encoding of acquired sound-sequence salience by auditory cortical offset responses. Cell Rep 2021;37:109927. [PMID: 34731615 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109927] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 de Chaumont F, Lemière N, Coqueran S, Bourgeron T, Ey E. LMT USV Toolbox, a Novel Methodological Approach to Place Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Their Behavioral Contexts-A Study in Female and Male C57BL/6J Mice and in Shank3 Mutant Females. Front Behav Neurosci 2021;15:735920. [PMID: 34720899 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.735920] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Scott KJ, Tashakori-Sabzevar F, Bilkey DK. Maternal immune activation alters the sequential structure of ultrasonic communications in male rats. Brain Behav Immun Health 2021;16:100304. [PMID: 34589796 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100304] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Goffinet J, Brudner S, Mooney R, Pearson J. Low-dimensional learned feature spaces quantify individual and group differences in vocal repertoires. Elife 2021;10:e67855. [PMID: 33988503 DOI: 10.7554/eLife.67855] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Neophytou D, Arribas D, Levy RB, Park M, Oviedo HV. Recurrent connectivity underlies lateralized temporal processing differences in Auditory Cortex.. [DOI: 10.1101/2021.04.14.439872] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Perrodin C, Verzat C, Bendor D. Courtship behaviour reveals temporal regularity is a critical social cue in mouse communication.. [DOI: 10.1101/2020.01.28.922773] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]