BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Oliveras I, Losilla J, Vives J. Methodological quality is underrated in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in health psychology. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2017;86:59-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.002] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Leclercq V, Beaudart C, Ajamieh S, Tirelli E, Bruyère O. Methodological quality of meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO: leads for enhancements: a meta-epidemiological study. BMJ Open 2020;10:e036349. [PMID: 32747348 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036349] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 De Santis KK, Lorenz RC, Lakeberg M, Matthias K. The application of AMSTAR2 in 32 overviews of systematic reviews of interventions for mental and behavioural disorders: A cross-sectional study. Res Synth Methods 2021. [PMID: 34664766 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1532] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Leclercq V, Beaudart C, Ajamieh S, Tirelli E, Bruyère O. Methodological quality of meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO: leads for enhancements: a meta-epidemiological study. BMJ Open 2020;10:e036349. [PMID: 32747348 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036349] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Losilla J, Oliveras I, Marin-garcia JA, Vives J. Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2018;101:61-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.021] [Cited by in Crossref: 45] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34] [Article Influence: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Leclercq V, Beaudart C, Ajamieh S, Rabenda V, Tirelli E, Bruyère O. Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA. J Clin Epidemiol 2019;115:46-54. [PMID: 31254618 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.014] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Gómez-García F, Ruano J, Gay-Mimbrera J, Aguilar-Luque M, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Alcalde-Mellado P, Maestre-López B, Carmona-Fernández PJ, González-Padilla M, García-Nieto AV, Isla-Tejera B. Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool. J Clin Epidemiol 2017;92:79-88. [PMID: 28893571 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.015] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Article Influence: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Gucciardi DF. Commentary: Mental Toughness and Individual Differences in Learning, Educational and Work Performance, Psychological Well-being, and Personality: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol 2017;8:2329. [PMID: 29375443 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02329] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Bo A, Hai AH, Chen DG, Hammock K. Risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of behavioral interventions for substance use outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2021;139:20-7. [PMID: 34166755 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.012] [Reference Citation Analysis]