BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Rosburg T, Mager R. The reduced auditory evoked potential component N1 after repeated stimulation: Refractoriness hypothesis vs. habituation account. Hear Res 2021;400:108140. [PMID: 33316574 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108140] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 López‐caballero F, Coffman B, Seebold D, Teichert T, Salisbury DF. Intensity and inter‐stimulus‐interval effects on human middle‐ and long‐latency auditory evoked potentials in an unpredictable auditory context. Psychophysiology 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14217] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Wang Y, Tang Z, Zhang X, Yang L. Auditory and cross-modal attentional bias toward positive natural sounds: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Front Hum Neurosci 2022;16:949655. [DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.949655] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Postal O, Bakay W, Dupont T, Buck A, Élodiedaoud, Petit C, Michalski N, Gourévitch B. Characterising Subcutaneous Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Mice. Hearing Research 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108566] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Takeuchi N, Fujita K, Taniguchi T, Kinukawa T, Sugiyama S, Kanemoto K, Nishihara M, Inui K. Mechanisms of Long-Latency Paired Pulse Suppression: MEG Study. Brain Topogr 2021. [PMID: 34748108 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-021-00878-6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Kamal F, Morrison C, Campbell K, Taler V. Event-related potential evidence that very slowly presented auditory stimuli are passively processed differently in younger and older adults. Neurobiol Aging 2021;103:12-21. [PMID: 33774574 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.02.014] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]