BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Desmedt O, Heeren A, Corneille O, Luminet O. What Do Measures of Self-Report Interoception Measure? Insights from A Systematic Review, Latent Factor Analysis, and Network Approach. Biol Psychol 2022;:108289. [PMID: 35150768 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108289] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Todd J, Swami V, Aspell JE, Furnham A, Horne G, Stieger S. Are some interoceptive sensibility components more central than others? Using item pool visualisation to understand the psychometric representation of interoception. PLoS One 2022;17:e0277894. [PMID: 36455037 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277894] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Canino S, Raimo S, Boccia M, Di Vita A, Palermo L. On the Embodiment of Social Cognition Skills: The Inner and Outer Body Processing Differently Contributes to the Affective and Cognitive Theory of Mind. Brain Sciences 2022;12:1423. [DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12111423] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Vig L, Köteles F, Ferentzi E. Questionnaires of interoception do not assess the same construct. PLoS ONE 2022;17:e0273299. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273299] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Dunn W, Brown C, Breitmeyer A, Salwei A. Construct Validity of the Sensory Profile Interoception Scale: Measuring Sensory Processing in Everyday Life. Front Psychol 2022;13:872619. [DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872619] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Garfinkel SN, Schulz A, Tsakiris M. Addressing the need for new interoceptive methods. Biological Psychology 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108322] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]