BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Marconi MA, Nicolakis D, Abbasi R, Penn DJ, Zala SM. Ultrasonic courtship vocalizations of male house mice contain distinct individual signatures. Animal Behaviour 2020;169:169-97. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.09.006] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Wölfl S, Zala SM, Penn DJ. Male scent but not courtship vocalizations induce estrus in wild female house mice. Physiol Behav 2023;259:114053. [PMID: 36502894 DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.114053] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Neophytou D, Arribas DM, Arora T, Levy RB, Park IM, Oviedo HV. Differences in temporal processing speeds between the right and left auditory cortex reflect the strength of recurrent synaptic connectivity. PLoS Biol 2022;20:e3001803. [PMID: 36269764 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001803] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Hoglen NEG, Manoli DS. Cupid’s quiver: Integrating sensory cues in rodent mating systems. Front Neural Circuits 2022;16:944895. [DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2022.944895] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Caruso A, Marconi MA, Scattoni ML, Ricceri L. Ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory mice: strain, age, and sex differences. Genes Brain Behav 2022;21:e12815. [PMID: 35689354 DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12815] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Ongstad S. Simple Utterances but Complex Understanding? Meta-studying the Fuzzy Mismatch between Animal Semantic Capacities in Varied Contexts. Biosemiotics. [DOI: 10.1007/s12304-022-09477-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Capas-peneda S, Saavedra Torres Y, Prins J, Olsson IAS. From Mating to Milk Access: A Review of Reproductive Vocal Communication in Mice. Front Behav Neurosci 2022;16:833168. [DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.833168] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Fernández-vargas M, Riede T, Pasch B. Mechanisms and constraints underlying acoustic variation in rodents. Animal Behaviour 2022;184:135-47. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.07.011] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Volodin IA, Yurlova DD, Ilchenko OG, Vasilieva NA, Volodina EV. Non-individualistic ultrasonic and audible isolation calls throughout ontogeny in a rodent, Eolagurus luteus. Behav Processes 2021;193:104540. [PMID: 34774667 DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104540] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Melotti L, Siestrup S, Peng M, Vitali V, Dowling D, von Kortzfleisch VT, Bračić M, Sachser N, Kaiser S, Richter SH. Individuality, as well as genetic background, affects syntactical features of courtship songs in male mice. Animal Behaviour 2021;180:179-96. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.08.003] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Abbasi R, Balazs P, Marconi MA, Nicolakis D, Zala SM, Penn DJ. Capturing the songs of mice with an improved detection and classification method for ultrasonic vocalizations (BootSnap).. [DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.20.444981] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Neophytou D, Arribas D, Levy RB, Park M, Oviedo HV. Recurrent connectivity underlies lateralized temporal processing differences in Auditory Cortex.. [DOI: 10.1101/2021.04.14.439872] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]