BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in CrossRef
For: Čečka F, Loveček M, Jon B, Skalický P, Šubrt Z, Neoral Č, Ferko A. Intra-abdominal drainage following pancreatic resection: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(40): 11458-11468 [PMID: 26523110 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11458]
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i40/11458.htm
Number Citing Articles
1
H. Jiang, N. Liu, M. Zhang, L. Lu, R. Dou, L. Qu. A Randomized Trial on the Efficacy of Prophylactic Active Drainage in Prevention of Complications after PancreaticoduodenectomyScandinavian Journal of Surgery 2016; 105(4): 215 doi: 10.1177/1457496916665543
2
Madeline Lemke, Lily Park, Fady K. Balaa, Guillaume Martel, Jad Abou Khalil, Kimberly A. Bertens. Passive Versus Active Intra‐Abdominal Drainage Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Retrospective Study Using The American College of Surgeons NSQIP DatabaseWorld Journal of Surgery 2021; 45(2): 554 doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05823-5
3
Waqas Farooqui, Karina Adler Riemenschneider, Luit Penninga, Christian Dacesin Vyrdal, Carsten Palnaes Hansen, Jan Henrik Storkholm. The diagnostic value of C-reactive protein for predicting pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomyScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2021; 56(3): 329 doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1867895
4
Kai-Wei Li, Kai Wang, Yue-Peng Hu, Chao Yang, Yun-Xuan Deng, Xin-Yu Wang, Yu-Xiu Liu, Wei-Qin Li, Wei-Wei Ding. Initial suction drainage decreases severe postoperative complications after pancreatic trauma: A cohort studyWorld Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023; 15(8): 1652-1662 doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1652
5
Feng Cao, Xiaogang Tong, Ang Li, Jia Li, Fei Li. Meta-analysis of modified Blumgart anastomosis and interrupted transpancreatic suture in pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomyAsian Journal of Surgery 2020; 43(11): 1056 doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.01.011
6
Jack O'Grady, Thomas L. Sutton, Kristin C. Potter, Erin Gilbert, Rodney Pommier, Skye C. Mayo, Brett C. Sheppard. The power of suction: Theory and practice in closed suction vs gravity drains and postoperative pancreatic fistulasThe American Journal of Surgery 2022; 224(2): 737 doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.02.063
7
J. Dembinski, C. Mariette, J.J. Tuech, F. Mauvais, G. Piessen, D. Fuks, L. Schwarz, S. Truant, C. Cosse, F.R. Pruvot, J.M. Regimbeau. Early removal of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatoduodenectomy in patients without postoperative fistula at POD3: Results of a randomized clinical trialJournal of Visceral Surgery 2019; 156(2): 103 doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2018.06.006
8
Yanchun Han, Zuowei Wu, Jiafan Song, Qiang Zhang, Lijuan Wei, Huimin Lu. RETRACTED: Effect of passive versus active abdominal drainage on wound infection after pancreatectomy: A meta‐analysisInternational Wound Journal 2024; 21(3) doi: 10.1111/iwj.14755
9
Kjetil Søreide, Knut Jørgen Labori. Risk factors and preventive strategies for post-operative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery: a comprehensive reviewScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2016; 51(10): 1147 doi: 10.3109/00365521.2016.1169317
10
Jishu Wei, Qiang Xu, Yuhua Zhang, Jiabin Jin, Xiaodong Tian, Qiaofei Liu, Zipeng Lu, Zheng Wang, Shanmiao Gou, Song Gao, Xianlin Han, Yefei Rong, Liandong Ji, Ye Lin, Guolin Li, Shi Chen, Feng Cao, Hua Chen, Wenming Wu, Yupei Zhao. Digestive tract reconstruction in pancreaticoduodenectomy in University Hospitals of China: a national questionnaire surveyJournal of Pancreatology 2022; 5(4): 151 doi: 10.1097/JP9.0000000000000106
11
Mahir Gachabayov, Shekhar Gogna, Rifat Latifi, Xiang D. Dong. Passive drainage to gravity and closed-suction drainage following pancreatoduodenectomy lead to similar grade B and C postoperative pancreatic fistula rates. A meta-analysisInternational Journal of Surgery 2019; 67: 24 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.05.001
12
Filip Čečka, Bohumil Jon, Pavel Skalický, Eva Čermáková, Čestmír Neoral, Martin Loveček. Results of a randomized controlled trial comparing closed-suction drains versus passive gravity drains after pancreatic resectionSurgery 2018; 164(5): 1057 doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.030
13
Akif BULUT, Tuğba AFŞAR, Nursel VATANSEVER. Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Cerrahi Dren Takibi ve Bakımına Yönelik Bilgi DüzeyleriAdıyaman Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2019; 5(1): 1278 doi: 10.30569/adiyamansaglik.493880
14
Hiromichi Kawaida, Hiroshi Kono, Naohiro Hosomura, Hidetake Amemiya, Jun Itakura, Hideki Fujii, Daisuke Ichikawa. Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgeryWorld Journal of Gastroenterology 2019; 25(28): 3722-3737 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i28.3722
15
Takashi Maeda, Hiroto Kayashima, Daisuke Imai, Kazuki Takeishi, Noboru Harada, Eiji Tsujita, Shinichi Tsutsui, Hiroyuki Matsuda. Evaluation of Drain Amylase Level after Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Special Reference to Delayed Pancreatic FistulaThe American Surgeon™ 2018; 84(3): 403 doi: 10.1177/000313481808400325
16
Yun Sun Lee, Hyung Sun Kim, Yeona Cho, Ik Jae Lee, Hyo Jung Kim, Da Eun Lee, Hyeon Woong Kang, Joon Seong Park. Intraoperative radiation therapy induces immune response activity after pancreatic surgeryBMC Cancer 2021; 21(1) doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08807-3
17
Giovanni Marchegiani, Giampaolo Perri, Alessandra Pulvirenti, Elisabetta Sereni, Anna Maria Azzini, Giuseppe Malleo, Roberto Salvia, Claudio Bassi. Non-inferiority of open passive drains compared with closed suction drains in pancreatic surgery outcomes: A prospective observational studySurgery 2018; 164(3): 443 doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.025
18
Linn S. Nymo, Kristoffer Lassen. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery2020; : 563 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33443-7_57