Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
Artif Intell Med Imaging. Apr 28, 2022; 3(2): 21-32
Published online Apr 28, 2022. doi: 10.35711/aimi.v3.i2.21
Published online Apr 28, 2022. doi: 10.35711/aimi.v3.i2.21
Ref. | Clinical question | Training set (number of subjects) | Validation set (number of subjects) | AI instrument | AUROC | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity |
Watson et al[66], 2021 | Detection of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (including PDAC) vs benign cysts | 18 | 9 | CNN | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Si et al[65], 2021 | Detection of pancreatic cancer (including PDAC, IPMN, PNET) | 319 | 347 | DL | 0.871 | 87.6% for PDAC | 86.8% for pancreatic cancer | 69.5% for pancreatic cancer |
Park et al[64], 2020 | Distinguishing pancreatic cancer tissue from autoimmune pancreatitis | 120 | 62 | Random forest machine learning | 0.975 | 95.2% | 89.7% | 100% |
Ma et al[63], 2020 | Differentiate pancreatic cancer from benign tissue | 330 | 41 | CNN | 0.9653 (plain scan) | 95.47% (plain scan),95.76% (arterial scan), 95.15% (venous phase) | 91.58% (plain scan), 94.08% (arterial scan), 92.28% (venous phase) | 98.3% (plain scan), 97.6% (arterial scan), 97.9% (venous phase) |
Zhang et al[67], 2020 | Detection of pancreatic cancer | 2650 images | 240 images | CNN | 0.9455 | 90.2% | 83.8% | 91.8% |
Liu et al[69], 2020 | Differentiating pancreatic cancer tissue from non-cancerous pancreatic tissue | 412 | 139 | CNN | 0.92 | 83.2% | 79.0% | 97.6% |
Gao et al[71], 2020 | To differentiate pancreatic diseases in pancreatic lesions | 398 | 106 | CNN | 0.9035 (includes PDAC, adenosquamous carcinoma, acinar cell carcinoma, colloid carcinoma, myoepithelial carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells, mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, pancreatoblastoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma and metastatic carcinoma) | NA | NA | NA |
Chu et al[70], 2019 | Differentiating PDAC from normal pancreas | 255 | 125 | Random forest | NA | 93.6% | 95% | 92.3% |
Zhu et al[72], 2019 | Detecting PDAC from normal pancreas | 205 | 234 | CNN | NA | 57.3% | 94.1% | 98.5% |
Liu et al[73], 2019 | Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer | 238 | 100 | CNN | 0.9632 | NA | NA | NA |
Corral et al[21], 2019 | Identify and stratify IPMN lesions | 139 | DL | 0.783 | NA | 75% (for PDAC or high grade dysplasia) | 78% (for PDAC or high grade dysplasia) | |
Chu et al[74], 2019 | Differentiating PDAC from normal pancreas | 456 | DL | NA | NA | 94.1% | 98.5% | |
Fu et al[75], 2018 | Pancreas segmentation (including PDAC, IPMN, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, Serous Cyst Adenoma, and Solid Pseudopapillary Tumour of the pancreas) | 59 | CNN | NA | NA | 82.5% | 76.22 (PPV) |
- Citation: Lin KW, Ang TL, Li JW. Role of artificial intelligence in early detection and screening for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Artif Intell Med Imaging 2022; 3(2): 21-32
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2644-3260/full/v3/i2/21.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.35711/aimi.v3.i2.21