Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
Artif Intell Gastroenterol. Dec 8, 2023; 4(3): 48-63
Published online Dec 8, 2023. doi: 10.35712/aig.v4.i3.48
Published online Dec 8, 2023. doi: 10.35712/aig.v4.i3.48
No. | Ref. | Number of patients | Primary objective | Sub-type of AI used | Outcome |
1 | Qureshi et al[36], 2022 | 108 | Identification of PDAC | ML | Accuracy: 86% |
2 | Ebrahimian et al[121], 2022 | 103 | Differentiation of benign vs malignant pancreatic lesions | RF | AUC: 0.94 |
3 | Chakraborty et al[59], 2018 | 103 | High risk vs low risk IPMN | RF, SVM | AUC: 0.81 |
4 | Polk et al[60], 2020 | 29 | High risk vs low risk IPMN | LR | AUC: 0.90 |
5 | Ikeda et al[122], 1997 | 71 | PDAC vs pancreatitis | NN | AUC: 0.916 |
6 | Chen et al[58], 2021 | 100 | SCN vs MCN | LASSO and RFE_Linear SVC | AUC: 0.932 |
7 | Yang et al[57], 2019 | 53 | SCN vs MCN | LASSO | AUC: 0.66 |
8 | Yang et al[123], 2022 | 63 | SCN vs MCN | MMRF-ResNet | AUC: 0.98 |
9 | Ren et al[124], 2020 | 112 | PDAC vs pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma | RF | AUC: 0.98 |
10 | Xie et al[125], 2021 | 226 | MCN vs ASCN | RF | AUC: 0.734 |
11 | Ziegelmayer et al[126], 2020 | 86 | AIP vs PDAC | CNN, ML | AUC: 0.90 |
12 | Li et al[62], 2022 | 97 | Focal-type AIP vs PDAC | LASSO regression | AUC: 0.97 |
13 | Gao et al[127], 2021 | 170 | MCN vs SCN | mRMR + LASSO | AUC: 0.91 |
14 | Dmitriev et al[53], 2017 | 134 | Classification of pancreatic cyst | RF, CNN | Accuracy: 83.6% |
15 | Li et al[54], 2019 | 206 | Classification of pancreatic cysts | DNN (Dense-Net) | Accuracy: 72.8% |
16 | Wei et al[56], 2019 | 260 | SCN vs other cystic neoplasms | ML | AUC: 0.767 |
- Citation: Rawlani P, Ghosh NK, Kumar A. Role of artificial intelligence in the characterization of indeterminate pancreatic head mass and its usefulness in preoperative diagnosis. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2023; 4(3): 48-63
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2644-3236/full/v4/i3/48.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.35712/aig.v4.i3.48