Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
Artif Intell Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2022; 3(5): 142-162
Published online Dec 28, 2022. doi: 10.35712/aig.v3.i5.142
Table 1 General features of machine learning methods in the development of artificial intelligence models in gastrointestinal pathology
AI models
Strengths
Weaknesses
ML, Traditional, SupervisedData output can be produced from the previously labeled training set Labeling big data takes a considerable amount of time and can be challenging
Allows users to reflect domain knowledge featuresFeature extraction quality significantly affects the accuracy
ML, Traditional, SupervisedUsers do not supervise the model or label any dataInput data is unknown and not labeled
Patterns are detected automatically Precise information related to data sorting is not provided
Save timeInterpretation is challenging
SVMSuitable for more efficient regression and classification analysis with high-dimensional dataNot suitable for large data sets. Requires more time for training; Low performance in overlapping classes
CNNNo labeling is required for important information and featuresLack of interpretability due to black boxes
The performance capacity in image recognition is high
FCNProvides computational speed A large amount of labeled data for training is required
The background noise is automatically eliminatedThe labeling cost is high
RNNAble to decide which information to remember from past experiencesThe model is hard to train
A suitable deep learning model for sequential dataThe computational cost is high
MILA detailed annotation is not requiredA large amount of training data is required
Suitable to be performed on large datasetsThe computational cost is high
GANThe potential to produce new realistic data that resembles the original dataThe model is hard to train