Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
Artif Intell Cancer. Dec 8, 2023; 4(2): 11-22
Published online Dec 8, 2023. doi: 10.35713/aic.v4.i2.11
Published online Dec 8, 2023. doi: 10.35713/aic.v4.i2.11
S.No. | Ref. | No. of patients in AI-based study | Methods | Result | Conclusion |
1 | Pham et al[29], 2023 | N = 53, rectal cancer biopsy | CNN based extraction of IHC images | SVMs extraction; total accuracy = 85%, Prediction of survival rate of more than 5 yr = 90%, and less than 5 yr = 75% | Use of AI can be informative for clinical decision making- whether required preoperative therapy or not |
2 | Kim et al[67], 2023 | N = 39, mid to lower rectal cancer patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy | Deep learning-based imaging reconstruction (DLR) effect on MRI quality | Compared to conventional MRI DLR-MRI showed significantly higher specificity values (P < 0.036) | Compared to conventional MRI, DLR significantly increased the specificity of MRI for identifying pathological complete response (pCR) |
3 | Wang et al[68], 2023 | N = 1651, machine learning model used for predicting major LARS following laparoscopic surgery of rectal cancer and their quality of life | The trained random forest (RF) model performed, and clinical utility of the model was tested by decision curve analysis | Compared to the conventional preoperative LARS score model, current machine learning model exhibited superior predictive performance in predicting major LARS | This model could potentially be used in the clinic to identify patients with a high risk of developing major LARS and then improve the quality of life |
4 | Qiu et al[69], 2023 | N = 27180, used eight machine learning Model for predicting chances lung metastasis in rectal cancer patients | They used DCA and calibration analysis to test all the models to predict risk of lung metastasis in patients with rectal cancer | XGB model had better clinical decision making and prediction ability than other models | XGB model based on clinicopathological information to predict the risk of lung metastasis in patients with rectal cancer, which may help physicians make clinical decisions |
5 | Shao et al[39], 2023 | N = 2469, consecutive patients with stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma who received anterior resection and did not receive neoadjuvant therapy | Five AI algorithms, (SVM), logistic regression (LR), Naive Bayes (NB), stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and random forest (RF), were employed to generate five models | In summary, the present study developed a high-performance AI model based on clinical preoperative and intraoperative les, which may be supportive for the guidance of the intraoperative decision-making by calculating the risk of AL | The application of this app can predict the risk of AL in patients with rectal cancer who have undergone anterior resection |
6 | Xia et al[70], 2023 | 172 rectal cancer patients were used for model training, and 18 patients were used for model validation. Another 40 rectal cancer patients were used for an end-to-end evaluation for both auto-segmentation and treatment planning | The PTV and OAR segmentation was compared with manual segmentation | The PTV DICE similarity coefficient was greater than 0.85 for all 40 patients in the evaluation dataset while the DICE indices of the OARs also indicated good performance | Deep learning-based automatic solution for rectal cancer treatment that can improve the efficiency of treatment planning |
- Citation: Yadav A, Kumar A. Artificial intelligence in rectal cancer: What is the future? Artif Intell Cancer 2023; 4(2): 11-22
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2644-3228/full/v4/i2/11.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.35713/aic.v4.i2.11