Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
Artif Intell Cancer. Oct 28, 2021; 2(5): 51-59
Published online Oct 28, 2021. doi: 10.35713/aic.v2.i5.51
Published online Oct 28, 2021. doi: 10.35713/aic.v2.i5.51
Ref. | Year | Model and endpoint |
Doyle et al[26] | 1992 | 10 feed forward back-propagation ANN model to predict LT survival |
Marsh et al[27] | 1997 | ANN for survival analysis and time to recurrence of HCC after LT |
Parmanto et al[28] | 2001 | Back-propagation through time ANN algorithm to predict outcomes after LT |
Cucchetti et al[29] | 2007 | ANN for survival prognosis of patients with cirrhosis |
Zhang et al[30] | 2012 | MLP model for predicting outcomes of patients with cirrhosis and compared the performance with MELD and SOFA scores |
Cruz et al[31] | 2013 | Radial basis function ANNs using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to match the donor-recipient pairs |
Lee et al[52] | 2018 | Compared the performance of ML approaches (decision tree, random forest, gradient boosting machine, support vector machine, naïve Bayes, MLP, and deep belief networks) with that of LR analysis to predict AKI after LT for cirrhosis and HCC (49%) |
He et al[53] | 2021 | LR analysis as a conventional model, and random forest, support vector machine, classical decision tree, and conditional inference tree algorithms to predict AKI after LT for cirrhosis and HCC (40.7%) |
- Citation: Bredt LC, Peres LAB. Artificial neural network for prediction of acute kidney injury after liver transplantation for cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Artif Intell Cancer 2021; 2(5): 51-59
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2644-3228/full/v2/i5/51.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.35713/aic.v2.i5.51