Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Meta-Anal. Oct 28, 2021; 9(5): 411-437
Published online Oct 28, 2021. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v9.i5.411
Published online Oct 28, 2021. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v9.i5.411
Table 3 Features of the conventional technique and all-inside technique
| Conventional technique | All-inside technique | |
| Invasiveness in the tibial tunnel | ||
| Bone damage | Moderate | Minor |
| Bleeding | Moderate | Minor |
| Invasiveness during autograft harvesting | Minor or moderate | Minor |
| Postoperative pain | Moderate | Minor |
| Complexity of surgery | Minor | Moderate |
- Citation: Takahashi T, Watanabe S, Ito T. Current and future of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. World J Meta-Anal 2021; 9(5): 411-437
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v9/i5/411.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v9.i5.411