Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Meta-Anal. Jun 28, 2021; 9(3): 297-308
Published online Jun 28, 2021. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v9.i3.297
Table 1 Study characteristics
Ref.
Study design
Patient population
Intervention
Comparator
Efficacy endpoint
Efficacy outcome time-point
Lingvay et al[25]Multinational, multicentre, 26-wk, randomised, open-label, 2-group, treat-to-target trialAdults with type 2 diabetesInsulin degludec/liraglutideInsulin glargine U100Baseline HbA1c level was 8.4% for the degludec/liraglutide group and 8.2% for the glargine group. HbA1c level reduction was greater with degludec/liraglutide vs glargine [-1.81% for the degludec/liraglutide group vs -1.13% for the glargine group; estimated treatment difference, -0.59% (95%CI: -0.74 to -0.45)], meeting criteria for noninferiority (P < 0.001) and meeting criteria for statistical superiority (P < 0.001)26-wk
Rosenstock et al[26]Randomised, open-label, parallel group, multicentreAdults with type 2 diabetesiGlarLixiInsulin Glargine U100Mean HbA1c was reduced from 8.0% at baseline to 6.3% and 6.5% with LixiLan and Gla-100, respectively, establishing statistical noninferiority and superiority of LixiLan [least-squared mean (95%CI) difference: -0.17% (-0.31, -0.04) (-1.9 mmol/mol, -3.4, -0.4); P = 0.01]24-wk
Rosenstock et al[28]Randomised, parallel, open label, 3-arm-treatmentAdults with type 2 diabetesiGlarLixiInsulin glargine U100; LixisenatideGreater reductions in HbA1c from baseline (8.1%) were achieved with iGlarLixi compared with iGlar and Lixi (-1.6%, -1.3%, -0.9%, respectively), reaching mean final HbA1c levels of 6.5% for iGlarLixi vs 6.8% and 7.3% for iGlar and Lixi, respectively (both P < 0.0001)30-wk