Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Meta-Anal. Jun 28, 2021; 9(3): 297-308
Published online Jun 28, 2021. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v9.i3.297
Published online Jun 28, 2021. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v9.i3.297
Ref. | Study design | Patient population | Intervention | Comparator | Efficacy endpoint | Efficacy outcome time-point |
Lingvay et al[25] | Multinational, multicentre, 26-wk, randomised, open-label, 2-group, treat-to-target trial | Adults with type 2 diabetes | Insulin degludec/liraglutide | Insulin glargine U100 | Baseline HbA1c level was 8.4% for the degludec/liraglutide group and 8.2% for the glargine group. HbA1c level reduction was greater with degludec/liraglutide vs glargine [-1.81% for the degludec/liraglutide group vs -1.13% for the glargine group; estimated treatment difference, -0.59% (95%CI: -0.74 to -0.45)], meeting criteria for noninferiority (P < 0.001) and meeting criteria for statistical superiority (P < 0.001) | 26-wk |
Rosenstock et al[26] | Randomised, open-label, parallel group, multicentre | Adults with type 2 diabetes | iGlarLixi | Insulin Glargine U100 | Mean HbA1c was reduced from 8.0% at baseline to 6.3% and 6.5% with LixiLan and Gla-100, respectively, establishing statistical noninferiority and superiority of LixiLan [least-squared mean (95%CI) difference: -0.17% (-0.31, -0.04) (-1.9 mmol/mol, -3.4, -0.4); P = 0.01] | 24-wk |
Rosenstock et al[28] | Randomised, parallel, open label, 3-arm-treatment | Adults with type 2 diabetes | iGlarLixi | Insulin glargine U100; Lixisenatide | Greater reductions in HbA1c from baseline (8.1%) were achieved with iGlarLixi compared with iGlar and Lixi (-1.6%, -1.3%, -0.9%, respectively), reaching mean final HbA1c levels of 6.5% for iGlarLixi vs 6.8% and 7.3% for iGlar and Lixi, respectively (both P < 0.0001) | 30-wk |
- Citation: Naidoo P, Bouharati C, Rambiritch V, Karamchand S, Tafuto BA, Leisegang RF. Glycated haemoglobin reduction and fixed ratio combinations of analogue basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: A systematic review. World J Meta-Anal 2021; 9(3): 297-308
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v9/i3/297.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v9.i3.297